So I hear Xanga is shutting down.  I probably will not open up another blog because I don’t feel like being charged with a felony.  First they outlaw criticism of the Religion of Peace, next they will only go down from there.  I’m thinking I will leave this country since it’s on the way to becoming an unfree Nazi hellhole.  maybe the Republicans will restore the first Amendment if they come into power, if they come into power, and if they have any decency.  But, if anyone would like to maintain contact with me then note me your contact info.  I’m not sending out a mass message because I always ignore those things myself.  Note me your email, facebook, or whatever, and I will stay in contact with you.  

Well, aside from the fact that I am seeing rumors about xanga closing down, I may also stop blogging, for good.

I have to say something about smokers, specifically women who smoke.  Today I saw this woman behind me, and she was smoking.  I couldn’t see much of her because the sun was so bright, but she had a good shaped hand (holding the cigarette) and she was playing with her hair with the other hand.  She was making a double colossal mistake by smoking in her car.  First of all, she was ruining the market value of her car, which is stupid enough, but she was also ruining the market value of herself.

Of course I’m not single anymore, but back when I was, whenever I saw a woman smoking it was an instant deal breaker.  I may have been on the approach, but as soon as the girl pulled out a cigarette I turned away, and I also wouldn’t even look at her again.  It’s just so thoroughly repellant.  That’s right, for some guys, a woman smoking is as much of a shield as from the opposite gender as a burka.

If you are a woman who smokes, or who is considering taking it up, then keep in mind it doesn’t matter how much effort you put into making your nails and hair look good, because the smoking is going to decimate the rest of your body.  A 78 year old woman can have good hair and nails with the proper treatments, but there isn’t much that can be done to restore the skin or body tissues to optimal condition.  Same goes for smoking, which is clinically proven to accelerate the aging process.  I mean, if the potential for lung cancer, mouth cancer, and throat cancer isn’t enough of a deterrant, then the decimated looks should be.

For the life of me I do not and cannot understand it.  Use some brains.

“Oh, but drinking soda’s and eating fast food is also real bad for you, and I don’t do that.”

Really?  That’s like saying that a gunshot to the face isn’t so bad because a knife wound to the arm also does damage.  Use some brains.

“But people in my family live long, and my grandmother lived to be 92 and she smoked.”

OK, but that does no exempt you from accelerated aging and the possibility of cancer.  Maybe your grandmother would have lived to be 120 without smoking, and looked like she was 30 at 50.  The fact is, when you smoke you inhale a burning toxic cloud.  Stop being stupid.

I for one am glad that smoking is banned in most buildings and public places.  It’s a hazard to everyone else that’s around.  I have allergies, so when I’m around that crap I start coughing an sneezing, and if I’m stuck in a contained space with it over a long time then my nose goes into overtime on snot production, and it runs out both ends.  If I have to pass close to a smoker I cough and choke, and don’t bother to hide it.  That stuff is toxic.

Also, I wouldn’t let my kids date smokers.  I don’t want to hear any liberal bullcrap about self actualization and freedom for kids.  Freedom is for people who can take care of themselves and pay their own way.  If you’re a kid you don’t have the same kind of freedom that an adult does.  You live under my roof, you obey my rules.  Don’t like it?  Then you better get your own roof, then you can make your own rules.

I don’t now how people get started smoking.  My guess is that they start in their teens, and they do it because they think it looks “cool.”  Well news flash, no it doesn’t.  When I see a teenage kid smoking I think “look at that idiot kid destroying his (or her) body because he thinks it’s cool.”  No you don’t look cool, and no you don’t look grown up to a grown up.  I didn’t think those idiots looked cool when I was in my teens either.  I still thought they just looked like idiots.

So here is what I want to know.  Why is it that that clown in the White House, that anti-American statist bastard Barack Osama is getting all involved in Myanmar on the grounds of “human rights violations,” while we don’t hear a word from him on the atrocities in Egypt?  Where is the indignation from the left?  This just goes to show how two of my major premises on the left have been absolutely correct:

1. They don’t question their leaders.  If Obama does it, it’s OK.  Does Obama approve of something?  Then it’s good.  Does Obama think something is a non-issue?  Then it’s irrelevant.  Does Obama think something is bad?  Then it’s bad.

2. The left hates Christians and is OK with them being killed for no reason.

SO Obama loves the Muslim people.  He’s so concerned about the Muslims in Myanmar.  He wants to end the oppression of Muslims, and the killing, and the persecution (directed at Muslims).  But if Muslims are doing those things to anyone else (especially Christians), then it’s OK. 

During the first visit to the White House in 47 years by a leader of the Southeast Asian nation, Obama called for an end to the killings of Rohingya Muslims in western Myanmar‘s Rakhine state.

Reformist Myanmar President Thein Sein vowed to resolve ethnic conflicts and bring perpetrators to justice.

“I also shared with President Sein our deep concern about communal violence that has been directed at Muslim communities inside Myanmar. The displacement of people, the violence directed towards them needs to stop,” Obama said.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-urges-myanmar-stop-violence-against-muslims-002528038.html;_ylt=AvmSfmpMCOpsZE8qJfMXvcnNt.d_;_ylu=X3oDMTVxYWU1bmszBGNjb2RlA2dtcHRvcDEwMDBwb29sd2lraXVwcmVzdARtaXQDQXJ0aWNsZSBNaXhlZCBMaXN0IE5ld3MgZm9yIFlvdSB3aXRoIE1vcmUgTGluawRwa2cDOTgxMGM2NjgtODY3Ni0zN2JlLWIzZWMtYTYzYzA0ZTI1MWQwBHBvcwMyBHNlYwNuZXdzX2Zvcl95b3UEdmVyAzY3NGEyZmUxLWMxYjYtMTFlMi1hZGZiLTkxOWY5YWRlZjcwNA–;_ylg=X3oDMTBhYWM1a2sxBGxhbmcDZW4tVVM-;_ylv=3

The Christians in Egypt have it much worse, and that is partly thanks to Obama for sponsoring that filthy terrorist regime, the Muslim Brotherhood.  I am now 100% certain that Obama would have sponsored Hitler if he were around during WWII.

So where is the outrage, or even the empty lip service from Obama regarding the Christians in Egypt?  Oh that’s right, there is none, because Obama doesn’t care about human rights violations, he just cares about helping Muslms and being anti-American.

Blasphemy cases occurred under former president Hosni Mubarak too, but they have increased since the uprising that toppled him. Egypt’s new constitution, drafted last year by an Islamist-led committee, criminalizes blasphemy, bolstering a pre-existing law against insulting religions. Rights groups say blasphemy laws restrict freedom of expression and are often used against minorities, but most Egyptians support such laws.

From 2011 to 2012, the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) tallied 36 accusations of blasphemy that were dealt with extra-legally, sometimes with village residents forcing the accused Christians to leave their village. In Cairo, several cases against prominent figures ended in acquittals. But in southern Egypt, where Luxor is located, all recent cases that have gone to trial have ended in convictions, according to EIPR. Throughout Egypt, most cases are brought against Christians.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/brotherhoods-egypt-blasphemy-charges-against-christians-surge-ahead-142935710.html

I will blog on the Egypt situation in more detail later.  But for now I’m going to just lay it out there and say that I am the opposite of Obama.  I don’t care if Muslims are being killed.  I don’t have an ounce of sympathy for Islam.  This sort of thing just enrages me, and anyways how are the internal affairs of Myanmar the business of American tax payers?  Do your freaking job Obama, and get your snotty nose out of the 3rd world. 

The first think I thought when I saw a news article mentioning that Congress is debating how to go to Mars was, “Could we get anyone less qualified to offer a valid opinion on such an important issue?”

It looks like the Democrats want to lasso a small asteroid, pull it into lunar orbit, and explore it.  Somehow they think this will be a useful stopping point on the way towards a manned mission to Mars.  The other option being discussed is to estblish a moon colony.  Under the Bush administration a moon colony had been planned, but one of the first things Obeyme did when he came to power was to cancel it. Apparently we didn’t have the money for superfluis things like science and progress, but we did have the money to support various terrorist organizations around the world and overthrow secular governments in North Africa. 

Now, while I do find the idea of the moon having it’s own moon compelling, it’s not really going to help with a Mars mission, whereas establishing a moon colony will offer an opportunity to construct and test a sealed and self contained environment in hostile conditions.  The technology can later be applied to establishing a permanent base on Mars.  In addition, the moon can be used as a jumping off point.  A low g environment means that a larger ship can be constructed.  IF they are serious about traveling longer distances through space they need to start constructing the ships in space, or at the very least in low g environments.  That way they can build larger ships, which will not necessarily land, but which will be able to carry more supplies, people, and equipment (landers included). 

It’s worth noting that Spain colonized th Canaries before they moved off to the New World.  When you are in the business of colonization it helps to conduct a test run at closer locations before moving off to more distant turf.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/moon-asteroid-congress-debates-best-pit-stop-mars-140916998.html;_ylt=An64Py4yYb6V.p9Jmr3w0j6tFWFH;_ylu=X3oDMTVxcjFyMjJ0BGNjb2RlA2dtcHRvcDEwMDBwb29sd2lraXVwcmVzdARtaXQDQXJ0aWNsZSBNaXhlZCBMaXN0IE5ld3MgZm9yIFlvdSB3aXRoIE1vcmUgTGluawRwa2cDZWRkZjlkYjctZWMxNC0zNmZmLTg5ZjMtNjUxYjViNmY0MGJhBHBvcwM0BHNlYwNuZXdzX2Zvcl95b3UEdmVyAzk5YWFlYWUxLWMyZTktMTFlMi1iYWZiLTk0MjA0MjdhYTViNg–;_ylg=X3oDMTBhYWM1a2sxBGxhbmcDZW4tVVM-;_ylv=3

So a Muslim mosque in West Bank has decided to openly fly a Nazi flag.  I am not surprised at all, but it strikes me as odd that some people are.

Obviously the Arab Muslims are not going to identify with the white supremacist aspects of Nazism, or the ehnic German/”volkish” aspects (misguided as they were).  What they do identify with however, is the killing of Jews.  In fact that has always been the case.  During WWII Hitler worked closely with those people, because they both agreed on one very central aspect to both ideologies: the Jews must die.

If anyone is surprised by this I would seriously like to know why.  It should be obvious what kind of an ideology Islam is.  How many times do they have to run around with their beards and hijabs yelling “death to the infidels” and “death to the Jews” before people get the message?  They couldn’t be any more apparant, and they are trying their best to be apparent, open, and obvious with their intent.

I don’t want to hear any talk about how the Fakestinians are some kind of unique people group that needs to be preserved (while white people need to die off).  We’re talking about a part of the world that is racially and ethnically homogenous.  Whatever unique semitic cultures were there before Islam, they are gone now.  This is all about killing and hating the Jews.  That’s it.  There is no unique people group struggling for homeland, they already have a huge homeland.  The whole Fakestinian “struggle” is nothing more than a rallying cry to kill Jews.  A bullcrap contrived excuse to perform a second Holocaust.

It’s also worth keeping in mind that these are Obama’s friends.  I really think that if Obama were alive during WWII he would have either stayed neutral or sided with Hitler.  At the very least he probably would have given Hitler money and weapons, as he now does for Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and those violent terrorists in Syria (who I sincerely hope Asad will kill and don’t care how he does it). 

If the allies had known what the future had in store for the civilized world, they wouldn’t have stopped the war with Germany and Japan, but would have pushed on and leveled Mecca, thus relieving the world of a great evil and menace. 

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/israeli-motorists-shocked-nazi-flag-seen-flying-near-143209208.html

I want to make something very clear.  I will say whatever I want, and I don’t care how much anyone hates me, especially liberals.

I never expected my entry on white decline to get all the attention that it got, but that’s cool. The more people that read it and see it, the better, even people who disagree and are inclined to disagree.

I must say that I was not at all surprised by the uninspired and highly predictable comments posted by leftists. Many of us have known for a long time that the left is inherently biased towards white people, which is why the majority of us, in the US at least, do not vote for the Dems (which is the left wing party here). If you are white you have to be absolutely insane or delusional to support any sort of left wing party. We have been targeted for destruction by the left. We have been targeted by economic and legal policies which are enabling and facilitating our decline. The goal is to economically and politically disenfranchise us.

Here is how the left is doing it:

1. Their most deadly achievement was to sour the relations between the genders. This is the main reason why I decided to throw in the towel and marry out. The well is poisoned.

2. Weaken the family so that marriages do not last, or form in the first place.

3. Make reproduction costly. Not only are we burdened with taxes, but the cost of medical care is already high to begin with. While we struggle to get by, our government takes our money and gives it to other people in exchange for them not working. In addition, illegal immigrants drive up the cost of medical care because we end up having to pay for our bills and theirs. Having children is expensive, and paying more taxes and more for medical care does not help. I don’t see why my money should be forcefully taken away and given to support someone else’s kids/indiscretion. I should be able to keep my money and put it towards my own kids.

4. Reduce the amount of money that men bring home in terms of real wages. This was accomplished by teaching women that having a career and earning money was more important than staying home and having kids. Now not only are men seldom able to fulfill the traditional role of provider, but they also have to compete with women for jobs just to get by on their own.

5. Put laws in place which are discriminatory and politically marginalizing. Of course I am talking about affirmative action and quotas, none of which work in our favor, especially not for white males. Being a white male is more of a liability than an asset when one goes to look for work.

6. Quell any attempts at discussing the matter or bringing the problem to light. This ensures that the issue will not be addressed, and the malefactors will therefore be able to continue with their agenda as popular support and social pressures will prevent people from holding them accountable. It is every despot’s dream.

Many of the responses I received illustrated how successfully the left has programmed people, and not just the hordes of liberal bots/followers, but also other people as well who are normally unsympathetic to the left wing agenda (in other areas). The left has done a good job ensuring that the issue cannot even be discussed, and without legal action they have managed to get average people to do their police work for them. This is truly sinister. Any attempt to discuss the matter elicits a Pavlovian type response of crying racism, which prevents the accuser from assessing the data critically, and may also similarly deter any bystanders.

It is also worth noting that most of the responses I got failed to address any of my actual points, and were instead targeted at addressing things that I was allegedly implying. For example, I never said anything against race mixing, and in fact I mentioned in the entry that I was doing it myself. I spite of that I had accusations of being opposed to race mixing, which indicates that the Pavlovian response was able to completely interfere with reading comprehension, so that many people never made it to the stage of assimilating or addressing what was actually said.

One commenter made a point which I found particularly insightful. Being attracted to other races is fine, but it is not a moral duty to marry with other races, nor does doing so convey any sort of superior status to the participants. I would also add that it is not a moral duty to allow the 3rd world to pour into our country and to pay their expenses, or to send out hard earned money to their countries. No such obligation exists. Anyone who insists it does is trying to elicit some sort of socio-demographic change. That is their agenda, because it is impossible to advocate such a position without anticipating the results unless one is incredibly retarded.

Not only is being concerned about white decline “racist” but acknowledging it is similarly considered racist. Any sort of white advocacy or enlightened self interest is considered “racist” as well. The refusal to acknowledge and discuss the issue is highly similar to how Muslims and actual white supremacists will frequently deny the Holocaust, or dogmatically insist that it wasn’t so bad.

A lot of white people have been programmed to view their history negatively, and to believe that they deserve to be punished or marginalized. Any white person who thinks that white decline is either not a problem or is a good thing has a certain degree of self hatred/loathing. The term is oikophobia (fear of self), and it is akin to Stockholm Syndrome. If people want to hate/loath themselves then that is fine with me, but keep it personal and don’t project it onto others. Oikophobia is a mental disorder, regardless of whether mainstream psychologists choose to acknowledge it as such or not. It stems from the same impetus which causes other self destructive behaviors like anorexia, binge eating, and cutting.

Being ashamed of yourself for being white, is shameful. So if you didn’t have something to be ashamed of before, you do now. You don’t owe anyone anything just because you are white.

If I had mentioned that some obscure tribe in Africa was going extinct, there would not have been a single accusation of racism. People would have looked at what I said, assessed it, and decided whether or not it mattered after having reviewed the data and arguments involved, or they would have simply ignored it entirely. If anyone stopped by and left a comment about how it didn’t matter that the tribe was going extinct, or that it was a good thing, then others would have chimed in with accusations of racism, bigotry, heartlessness, etc. Again, people have been conditioned to be anti-white, and equate white self advocacy with racism.

I find it especially interesting how people who are not white sometimes insist dogmatically that it white decline is not a problem and that we should not be concerned over it. I am not going to call attention to any particular individuals, because I am civil, but I am going to put out a hypothetical scenario. Imagine if the tables were reversed? What if black people were going extinct (actually their numbers are growing, but play along), and there was a black man trying to call attention to it? What if I went to his page and told him that it was a good thing his people were going extinct, that it doesn’t matter, or that he should be happy over it, then would that be racist? How would any bystanders react? Think carefully. Of course he would be upset with me, and would probably take that comment as racist and personal on some level. Such a reaction would be understandable.

It’s normal for most people to not want their group to be obliterated. It has to do with the human survival instinct, which is one of the few instincts that human beings have. It takes some extra effort to obliterate a people group and get members of that group to cheer as it’s done. That sort of behavior is not natural, it has to be conditioned. So the question is why was that conditioning set in place and who is responsible?

What I’m about to talk about is the opposite of WPWW (White Pride World Wide).  You might call this white shame world wide.  No I’m not going to talk about the things that the cultural Marxists say we should be ashamed of, because that all is bullcrap.  I am going to talk about why we are going extinct and why.

It is safe to say that in the majority of white countries our birth rates are dismally abysmal.  For the most part we are not even putting out enough kids to maintain equilibrium.  In some parts of the world the birthrate is half of what it needs to be for replineshment.  That means that with each generation the population gets cut in half.  No I don’t want to hear about overpopulation.  Overpopulation is a 3rd world problem, and our declining birth rates are not going to do anything to reduce the birth rates in the 3rd world. 

Some time ago I read an article on yahoo written about this woman who said that having kids was the greatest mistake she ever made in her life.  People were leaving lots of negative comments (naturally), and someone posted a comment saying that if one parent cannot stay home with the kids at all times then no oe should have kids.  The comment indicated a severe lack of awareness, but somehow it got high approval ratings.  The fact is, most coulples cannot afford to live off of only one income.  A lot of women have to work whether they want to or not, if the family intends on being able to support kids.  We have the feminist movement to thank for that.  I am a poor man myself.  If I want I could probably have my wife stay home and just support her, but if we want kids then she needs to also work, otherwise the money isn’t there.  Many people are in that situation these days.  So  left a comment saying that it is the civic duty of all PRODUCING/viable law abiding citizens to have children.  Having children is how people keep their culture and civilization alive. 

My commet received so many negative ratings that it may even have been hidden, which is what happens on yahoo when a comment receives a good deal of negative ratings.  Normally my comments there get good ratings.  Of course I was upset over this, not at the fact that I got negative ratings (people have the right to hate, despise, and otherwise disagree with me), but at he abysmal state of our culture and the level that it has sunk to which would cause people to have such a negative view of family and reproduction.  It’s like they want to go extinct.  No culture or people group can continue to exist without a next generation.  This sort of thing ought to be obvious to anyone.  Yes having kids requires one to make sacrifices, but so do many of the things people choose to acquire in place of having kids.  It’s up to the individual to make the right sacrifices. 

Having kids is more important than you owning a fancier car, or a more expensive (yet not necessarily larger) house.  Let me explain what happens to your stuff when you die.  You can spend your whole life working, getting more stuff, getting promoted at work, getting a fat bank account, and then your dead.  After you die you lose every single thing you worked for.  No children means that big daddy government will get all of your stuff.  People have different beliefs about what happens to the consciousness that defines you as an individual.  Let’s say you just cease to exist.  No kids means no legacy, so in a thousand years it will be as though you never existed, and for all intents and purposes you never did, unless you are a genius inventor (which most people are not).  The gross majority of humanity does not make it into the history books, even in the most advanced of civilizations.  Now lets say that there is an after life (which is my position).  You were a materialistic and shallow, and you spent your entire life chasing after things which you cannot keep and which you may not have even had the time to enjoy.  You weren’t investing in the right kind of treasure, so now you have an eternity of nothing. 

It’s ironic how so many people can work so hard, and in the long run achieve nothing.  Not saying that I have achieved a lot, but I’m trying to keep things in perspective.  I am not promoting sloth, or having children that you cannot take care of.  If you cannot support children then do not have them, period.  If you go the route of living off the government’s tit then your children will be a burden to society, and will probably not amount to anything more than what you are.  But that being said, there as to be balance. 

If a man is making enough money to take care of his wife and kids then there is no reason for the woman to work.  In fact it is better for society as a whole if she does not, because she might be taking up a job for fun, which someone else desperately needs.  All of the world’s most successful civilizations operated on the principle of gender specific social roles, with a strong family unit. Why?  Because a civilization with a weak family is going to die out, as the majority of white cultures are dying out today.  In succesful long lived civlizations the man works and supports the family, while the woman stays home and manages the house.  The way things are now for the majority of white cultures is that it is impossible for both partners to stay home.  Conditions have been established that make it difficult to create families. 

The institution of family has been undermined in other ways as well.  Our divorce rate is lamentably ridiculous when compared with that of other races and cultures.  Divorce does severe damage to the financial and emotional integrity of the family.  Not only does it disrupt the family unit, but it sets a bad precedent for the next generation.  Divorce damages the strengh of the family on all levels.  It used to be that marriage was treated as marriage, not a casual dating relationship or a sexual cohabitation.  Most people today see marriage as a sexual cohabitation rather than what it was meant to be, which is the foundational bedrock upon which families are built.  We can see the lack of understanding and appreciation for marriage evidenced by the flippant attitude by which it is treated, as well as the ludicrous notion that homosexual relationships are somehow in the same category as marriage.  No a homosexual relationship is not at all the same as true marriage, and it can never be regardless of what the law makers and courts have to say.

Another obstacle to proper family formation is that our women have been programmed to have contempt for us, or hate us.  Of course I realize that not all white women are this way, but many if not most are.  They have been taught by the cultural Marxists to view us as oppressive colonizers who are inherently abusive.  This view is a blatant denial of reality, but it is one which has pervaded all white cultures across the board.  White men are on average the most considerate and benevolent type of man a woman can get.  One of the severely damaging by-products of this myth is that there is a “rape culture” in white countries.  There is no rape culture in white countries.    In fact our laws are disproportionatly skewed in favor of women.  Our educational system caters to women.  The job market and entertainment industry cater to women.  Education and entertainment have teamed up to portray men negatively, and present women as the natural leaders both in the home and in the workplace.  Men are portrayed in TV shows and commercials as being stupid and/or incompetant, with their wives and children having to correct them or tell them off.  Those types of shows are both an attack on men and on the role of the father.  This is not the natural order of things, and civilizations who have those views and which buck the natural authority structure of the family unit CANNOT and will not survive over the long term.  I daresay the only entertainment industry which has not been cowed by the feminist movement is the video game industry.  WHICH is why the majority of gamers are men, while the majorty of people who watch TV and shop at the bookstores are women.  Of course feminists are trying to sink their claws into that as well, so we’ll see what happens.

It’s difficult for any culture to survive when the majority of women have contempt for the men.  It cannot work over the long term.  The most important emotional needs for a man are respect and a feeling of accomplishment.  When women constantly denegrate men and their achievements it creates emotional distance, which means more one night stands and divorces.  More broken families, and more bastards.  If white women want marital stability and emotional gratification from us then they need to treat us with unconditional respect rather than maintaining a constant undertone of contempt with spurts of passive aggression.  More white men are going to turn to other kinds of women for marriage when it comes to marriage, as growing numbers of us will cease to view white women as viable marriage material.  Even white women who are good and have their act together will get passed over for marriage due to negative stereotypes.  I got so sick of it that I lost all motivation to pursue white women, even with all my concern about white decline (which is a valid concern).  I still find them physically attractive, but I no longer have the emotional energy to be in that kind of relationship.  I feel a physical drop in energy just thinking about it.  It is the same feeling one has when you recognize that you have put in your best effort, and it has proven to be insufficient.  No matter how hard you try the outcome will be failure.  That sort of feeling.

There is no way a race or culture can survive if such conditions exist between men and women, and if our people are going to survive then we need to recognize the mental diseases that are afflicting us and actively work to remedy them.  We need to make proper demands from our government and our educational industries.  We need to recognize wrong thinking (such as the idea that there are no essential differences between men and women) and eliminate it.  We have survived for thousands of years, which proves that we have what it take to survive.  So we can survive, but whether or not we will is another matter.  Honestly, I don’t think we will survive except as small minorities barely clinging to life, but who knows?  We have to decide we want to survive, and take the necessary steps.

Imagine what the world would be like if white people had gone extinct 1000 years ago, 2000 years ago, or 3000 years ago.  Imagine a world without Socrates, Pythagoras, Julius Caesar, John Locke, Nicola Tesla, Sir Isaac Newton, Gregor Mendel, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Edison, Steve Jobs, or Bill Gates (just to name a few).  Imagine a world without great composers such as Handel, Bach, or Mozart.  Imagine a world without the Roman Empire or the US.  Imagine a world without great authors such as Shakespear, Milton, or Tolkien.  I could go on and on, but my point is that humanity will be diminished in the future by our loss, and that is not boasting, it’s just the logical extrapolation based on what has occured so far.

Watch these videos:

This is the latest outrage from Egypt:

LUXOR, Egypt (AP) — An Egyptian Christian teacher detained over charges of insulting Islam has been released on bail on Tuesday, her lawyer said.

A history and geography teacher in the southern city of Luxor, 24-year-old Dimiana Abdul-Nour paid L.E. 20,000 (almost $3,000 dollars) to be freed pending further investigation, the lawyer, Badawi Abu-Shanab said. The decision comes four days after a judge ordered her detained for 14 days during the investigation.

Parents of a student had accused the teacher of showing contempt to Islam while talking to fourth-graders about religion. Three pupils allegedly complained the teacher showed disgust when she talked about Islam, something the family and lawyer of Abdul-Nour denied.

Egypt is witnessing a surge of blasphemy-related allegations leveled by ultraconservative Islamists against their critics, including the country’s Christians who make up 10 percent of the population.

Christians have long complained of discrimination. Emboldened by Islamist electoral gains since the ouster of president Hosni Mubarak in the 2011 uprising, members of the fundamentalist Salafi movement have recently been linked to a spike of violence against Christians.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/egypt-detained-christian-teacher-released-bail-134536402.html;_ylt=AtvS1iQthuWitAwKi9urdbeZCMZ_;_ylu=X3oDMTVxYzU3aXEwBGNjb2RlA2dtcHRvcDEwMDBwb29sd2lraXVwcmVzdARtaXQDQXJ0aWNsZSBNaXhlZCBMaXN0IE5ld3MgZm9yIFlvdSB3aXRoIE1vcmUgTGluawRwa2cDOWM1Y2U0MmMtMDY0YS0zMmFlLTg1ZjgtNTQxMjA5ZjMxNWUxBHBvcwMxBHNlYwNuZXdzX2Zvcl95b3UEdmVyAzU2Y2NlNjYwLWJjYTktMTFlMi1iMzdmLTc4YjJkZTMxMWVmOA–;_ylg=X3oDMTMzc2lwaGtnBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDYTY2NjVlY2ItMmIxNy0zYTNhLWFmMGMtMzM2MmIxZTk1ODhhBHBzdGNhdANibG9nc3x0aGVsb29rb3V0BHB0A3N0b3J5cGFnZQ–;_ylv=3

This is the kind of society that Islam creates.  This is what happens when Muslims become the majority.  This is why we should put a dead stop on all Islamic immigration to the US.  I’m tired of hearing people demand that we tolerate this religion.  I don’t understand why we should tolerate this religion in the US when they don’t tolerate any other religions in their countries.  Muslims do not belong in the US.  I don’t want to hear any bullcrap about “tolerance”.  Talk to them about tolerance.

Also why aren’t all these “activists” boycotting Egypt?  I want to know why all these left wingers are all indignant about Israel for supposed human rights violations, yet they turn a blind eye to Egypt?  I don’t want to hear any crap about Israel being worse because that is not bone out by reality.  This kind of crap doesn’t happen in Israel.  I want to know where is the boycott on Egypt?  Where is it?  What groups are rallying for better treatment of religious minorities, ethnic minorities, and freedom of speech in Egpyt? 

Even if she talked about Islam in a negative tone, so what?  What reason is there for Christians, or any other religion, to have a positive view of Islam?  Islam has decimated the Egyptian civilization, the Christians in Egypt are all that is let of that, and the persecution against them is NON-STOP.  Why should Egyptian Christians feel warm fuzzies over Islam?  Why should anyone for that matter?  Why should we want to live in the kind of societies that Muslims build?

Well, I’m not in Egypt so I will talk about that savage death cult openly.  Islam is false savage death cult, which is more genocidal and toxic than Nazism.  Muhammad wasn’t a prophet, and he was not any sort of role model or ideal man.  He was an ignorant child molesting desert bandit, who seriously thought that the sun set in puddle of muddy water.  If anything he belongs in the same category with Ariel Castro and his brothers.