This entry was inspired by a few different people I have seen online who self identified, sometimes in bragging ways, as being an Alpha male.  In some cases they may have been correct, but in most cases it strikes me as a hallow and meaningless boast.  Especially when the boast comes from either liberals or ghetto-ites.

First let us discuss exactly what an alpha male is.  In biology, and zoology, the term “alpha male” typically refers to the leader of the pack among pack animals, such as canids.  The alpha male is either the most powerful male in the pack, or is perceived by the others as being so.  The alpha male is free to have intercourse with any of the females in the pack, and if another male wants the same female he has to yield or fight about it.  The same is true if another male is chewing on a piece of meat and the alpha male decides he wants it.  If he chooses to fight about it then he runs a severe risk of getting ripped to shreds.  If he fights and wins then he becomes the new alpha male by default.  Alpha = power, and in the world of nature it is synonymous with the male who has the most power.

When dealing with humans the term alpha male carries a very similar meaning (men with the most power and influence), but with one key difference: Power is not directly related to physical strength in most cases. 

There are two components which are absolutely indespensable for being a human alpha male:

1) Having power

2) Using it effectively, which results in dominance

I believe that the majority of alpha males do not typically go around stating that they are alpha males, because they know what they have and what they can get, so any such statement would be gratuitous.  Typically the “men” who go around boasting about being an alpha male are actually beta men who want to be alphas.  When it comes to liberal men I don’t really need to state why they are not alpha men, so I am going to skip over them and talk specifically about the ghetto-ites, gang bangers, thugs, pimps, and general whoremongers. 

“Bangin lot’s a hoes” does not make one an alpha male, neither does beating on a woman.  Let us look at it this way.  Suppose that we divide up the supply of women into a heirarchy based on the primary factors that most men care about: physical attractiveness, youth, and physical fitness.  For the sake of argument let us also add in education, which is not necessarily a deal maker or breaker but it is something that many men also care about.

Here are some graphs to represent the supply of women (Warning: Before anyone fusses at me about “objectifying” women please keep in mind that women also apply ratings to men based on their own criteria.  If it’s not wrong for women to do it then it’s not wrong for men.  In any case, objectivity is necessary in order to understand reality):

So if one were to group women based on the quantity of the desired characteristics they have plus the abundance level (or quantity) at which they possess each characteristic, then you are going to end up with diminishing numbers as qualities and quantities go up. 

The very bottom rung would consist of women who are either undesireable or less desirable for a variety of reasons.  The bottom rung may includes women who are physically unattractive, women who have had sex with so many different partners that they are considered irreversably contaminated or low, women who have children outside of wedlock, women who are single but who have aged past their prime, etc. etc.  The gang bangers, hoodsters, pimps, whoremongers, etc., may have intercourse with a variety of women, may dominate and use those women, and they may even physically abuse them, but they always draw their women from the bottom rung, or at best the bottom two rungs. 

I had one of these sorts brag to me that he has banged more women than there are hairs on my head (which of course includes facial hair), and while that may be true, it is nothing to boast about.  It is like a man boasting that he is good at playing darts because he hits the wall each time.  Any beta male with low or no standards can easily copulate with women from the bottom rung, and he can do so without any strings attached.  But if those same thugs want to move up to the third rung it is going to be extremely difficult for them because the women in the 3rd rung will have higher expectations, and the odds are that the bottom feeding whoremonger does not know how to effectively socialize with women from that level.  Also, women from that level have more options when it comes to choosing mates, so money, career, and intelligence are going to be used as filters on any male candidates that approach them.  If they want to move up to the 4th level (green) then they will not stand a chance, because women also sort men based on their own heirarchy.

The average beta male probably has access to the bottom three levels of the pyramid.  If he plays his cards right maybe he can move up but that is extremely difficult.  A true alpha male has access to every level of the pyramid.  The alpha male can pair with women from the bottom rung, but the thugs and gangbangers who typically run with those women do not have access to any women on the top rung.

When I think of alpha men I think of the sorts of men who live in my parents neighborhood, which is an upper middle class to upper class neighborhood.  I can bench press more than most of them, I can also run further and faster than many of them.  BUT, in terms of real power what I have is just a small fraction of what they have.  “Well I can beat up most of those guys,” the thug might say.  Yes, maybe you can, and then you can go to jail and get sodomized until you have to wear a diaper to keep your fudge from falling out.  At that point you are not an alpha by any standard, in fact you aren’t even a beta, you’re just a bottom.  The fact is that intelligence + marketability = wealth, and wealth = power. 

The man with more funds at his disposal has the ability to make more things happen, and to buy greater security for himself.  He can also offer a woman more security, as well as a much more lavish lifestyle.  IF you have any sort of conflict with such a man and it goes to court then he is going to have the better lawyer.  The end result of all this is that the alpha male gets what he wants.  If he decides he wants a boat he gets a boat.  If he wants to live in a different neighborhood he gets up and moves.  If he wants lots of space around him he gets an estate.  If he wants to live in a crowded place like NYC and STILL have lots of space around him then he gets that.  If he wants a woman with any particular set of characteristics he gets her.  He is not limited by looks and physical strength in the same way that the beta male is.

One day I was driving into my parents neighborhood and I saw a bunch of families out.  The men had different physiques, ages, hair colors, amounts  of hair, etc., but the women were all fairly uniform.  All of the women were blond, all of them were thin or athletic, and they were all about the same height.  They also all had good facial structures, although I personally did not care for the way their skin looked as they were all tanned and had apparently been doing so for some time.  When I saw this I could not help wondering that if, over time, and assuming that the government does not interfere too much, the upper class people will begin to have a uniform look.  But upon further reflection I concluded that this was not the case.  The fact is those men represent an older generation, I would say they were mostly in their 40′s and 50′s, and many of the white males belonging to generations older than myself have a preference for tanned blondes, while the younger generations of men have their own preferences.  That being said, the fact is that those sorts of women were in short supply when those men were looking for wives, and they still are, but because of their wealth and power they were able to overcome the supply issues (which beta men typically cannot) and get what they want. 

That is what it means to be an alpha man.  A punk with something to prove is not an alpha man.

In case anyone is interested, no I do not consider myself to be an alpha male (I do consider myself to be a lone wolf).  I did finally manage to get the sort of woman I wanted but I had to go to great lengths and personal risk to do so.  I also had to look overseas to population pools where different sets of factors were at play.  I highly reccomend India.  I have heard good things about China, but I would stay away from the Phillippines.

I don’t understand why so many people are getting all bent out of shape over the Mayan Calender ending.  It disturbs me that so many people are superstitious these days.  I have always considered superstition to be the religion of fools.  So many people are scared stupid, or stupidly scared, over this that the government has released a blog to try to make these idiots calm down.  

I have a question for ALL Obamanites, and I have yet to receive a straight answer on this, or any kind of answer.  I have asked quite a few of you guys this question, and either my inbox on both Yahoo and Xanga is malfunctioning or this question is an automatic conversation stopper.  But I want to put it to you all right now and in plain sight.

The question is, how do you feel about tax money being sent to sponsor Islam and the spread of Islam?  As you know, or should know, Obama is giving money to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  He is also giving money to Pakistan, and Hamas.  Yes Hamas.  The money these people receive will help fund the building of mosques, Islamic education and indoctrination in public schools for both Muslims and non-Muslims, and the killing of Christians and Jews.  I know that most of you guys probably don’t pay taxes, but for the sake of argument (and for those who do), how do you feel about this?  Do you think it is fair for Obama to demand tax hikes when this is how he spends our money?  Every time I ask these questions I get no answers from you guys.  I can almost hear the crickets.

The thing is, I have a sneaking suspicion that the gross majority of you guys are OK with this, and that even if you don’t entirely agree with it you consider it to be a small blip rather than a real serious and deadly problem.  I have a theory that if Obama were somehow able to run for a third term 99.999% of you who came out for him the second time would come out for him again.

I know there are a lot of die hard atheists and Godless liberals on the left who supposedly get enraged over public endorsement and funding of any “religion.”  I know you guys get all bent up over things like the ten commandments being in courthouses, “In God we Trust” beng on money, and you claim to be adamantly opposed to your tax money going to fund any kind of theocracy.  Well here’s the thing, your money is going to fund a theocracy.  You worked hard to get God out of the public education in the US, and any time there is talk about putting disclaimers about evolution in public schools then you cry theocracy again (even though it’s not).  But now you have your tax money going to support a religion, teaching of a religion in public schools, and you are directly funding theocratic systems which hate you just as much as they hate us.  All of those countries are theocracies, every last one.  Make no mistake on that.  Oh yes, the Muslims hate all non-believers, whether they be atheists or Christians.  There is no separation of “church and state” (or Mosque and state if you will) in the Middle East and North Africa The life expectency of an overt atheist in the Middle East is at least as short as that of an open Christian.  Obama is using your money to sponsor theocracies that hate us.  Where is your indignation? 

This is why I think that all you self proclaimed anti-religious leftists and Godless liberals don’t really hate all religions, just Christianity.  Because I have not seen one ounce of outcry over this.  Instead I still see all kinds of talk about how you want to raise taxes on “the rich,” which BTW is not a fixed category (more on that later).

But I do want a serious answer from you guys.  If this has caused you to break with Obama, or even the DNC as a whole then I want to know so I can shake your hand.  If this has not caused you to break with Obama then I want to hear your reason/excuse.  Explain to me how you are not a hypocrite in that case. 

In Ohio a man was sentenced to prison for making fun of a girl with cerebral palzy.  The man was convicted of two charges:

1) Menacing Behavior, for swinging around a chain on his front porch and allegedly threatening to strangle the mother.

2) Disorderly Conduct, for making fun of the kid herself. 

As a result of the convictions the man was sentenced to 29 days in jail.  Apparently Ohio also has laws about making comments against race and religion:

Jennifer Fitzsimmons, the chief assistant city prosecutor for this case, says in the three years she’s been in this role, she’s never seen anything like this.

“I think when we look at cases, there’s case law out there regarding people commenting and gesturing against race and religion. But when there’s nothing out there regarding disabilities, it took me a little bit longer to come to a decision.”

Source: http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/man-sentenced-jail-teasing-disabled-girl-015101432–abc-news-topstories.html

Of course the odds are that these “protections” do not extend to white people or Christians. 

Anyways, I got into it with some liberals in the comment section on the article, but before I discuss how it went down let me say this.  I do not approve of this guy’s actions for making fun of a disabled kid, or for threatening the mother.  But here is the thing, while threatening the mother may justify some sort of legal action (such as a restraining order), making fun of a person, thing, or idea for any reason, no matter how irrational, unwarrented, or mean, is not a crime.  Freedom of speech is a Constitutionally protected behavior, without any qualifiers. 

I was amazed to see how so many commenters were saying that his prison sentence was not long enough or hard enough.  I left a comment saying what I said in the previous paragraph, albeit with fewer words, and I received an ample amount of hatred for it.  Of course anyone is welcome to hate me if they want to, and I won’t lose any sleep over it.  But what does bother me is how there is a growing disdain and disregard for freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech is one of the most important freedoms a society can have.  It was one of the guiding principles the US was founded upon.  There is nothing in the Constitution about freedom of speech ending where someone’s feelings begin.  Anyone who wants to have conditions and laws like that is opposed to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  The main reason why we have guaranteed freedom of speech is so that people in government can be held accountable, which requires a free and umitigated exchange of information. 

“Oh but it’s mean, and you can’t hurt someone’e feelings.”  Too bad, and yes I can. 

“But freedom of speech does not extend to using speech irresponsibly.”  Freedom of speech is unconditional, and it’s not up to you to determine what is or is not responsible.  That is a subjective value judgment, and I don’t want anyone’s subjective value judgements controlling my speech.

One of these guys said that making fun of someone is torture.  No, making fun of someone is making fun of someone.  Driving reeds under your fingernails is torture (China).  Pushing someone back into a burning building is torture (Sudan).  Getting your feelings hurt is not torture.  If your feelings are really that delicate then you are probably not cut out for the adult world.

Another guy said that I just wanted to make fun of people.  Not really, but if I ever decide to then that is a Constitutionally protected right, and I should be able to criticize anyone or anything without worrying about getting arrested or going to jail. 

The most humorous comment I received was some guy saying that I must have never been made fun of before.  The story of my childhood is one of pretty much non-stop ridicule from other children, marked by the occasional escalation to physical violence.  It maxed out in 8th and 9th grade.  I got made fun of for thing that I could help as well as things that I could not.  I had terrible allergies at the time, so much so that I had to carry around a box or two of tissues in my backpack, and usually by the end of class my desk would be full of used tissues.  I had to deal with ridicule for that every day.  One time one of the other boys called me a “slobbering faggot,” and everyone else laughed, and the teacher didn’t do anything.  It could be argued that my allergies were a disability, and unlike a retarded person I had the intellectual capacity to understand exactly what was going on and how I was being ridiculed. 

I also faced physical violence.  Most of the time it was due to random attacks from other students and children, but probably about 25% of the time I struck the first blow in retaliation to continued insults.  Of course when that happened I got in trouble, which is also what happens in the adult world when you react to a situation with inappropriate force.

I’m not saying this because I want anyone’s sympathy, I’m saying this because there is a lesson to be learned here.  Although I hated it at the time and wanted it to stop, I am grateful for those experiences in retrospect.  They made me into more of a man, and in some areas motivated me to correct deficiences.  For example, the comments about my being scrawny and/or physically underpowered caused me to enroll in a Kung Fu class, which not only taught me valuable self defense tactics but also self control and restraint.  Later on I began lifting weights in order to correct a deficiency. 

In addition to self discipline, I learned valuable truths about humanity and human behavior during those times of nearly unbroken ridicule.  I became more of a man, with better discipline, self control, and composure as a result. 

If someone is making fun of you there are options you have in a free society.  You can insult the person back.  The oldest rule of law legal systems in the world have always permitted equal retaliation, because justice is about balancing the scales.  If someone insults you then you are free to insult them back, but not free to use force against them.  Another option you have is to ignore their behavior.  That is what my dad always told me to do when I was young and reactionary.  It is sound and logical advice.  Avoiding the people who irritate you is another option.  Finally, you have the option of correcting a deficiency which may be the source of their ridicule.  While I recognize that not all things which are ridiculed are deficiencies, and not all deficiencies are correctable, there are many things which can and should be corrected.  For example, if someone is fat and getting made fun of for being fat, rather than crying about it, lashing out violently, or demanding that someone else’s speech be muzzled they should take steps to correct being fat.  You can change your diet and work out.  If you are not willing to do those things then you should not be angry when people point out the obvious.

In an unfree society you can only do and say as much as the state allows.  Maybe no one can make fun of certain aspects that pertain to you, but you must also be careful what you say.  Even something said on accident could trigger an arrest.

Once you start limiting freedom of speech it is a slippery slope.  It’s only a matter of time before criticism of politicians and government policies is a crime, and then there will be thought police, and neighbors reporting you for something you may have said.  It will be the Salem Witch Trials all over again. 

So no, I do not under any condition support laws against freedom of speech.  I don’t care if anyone’s feelings get hurt.  Grow up.  If you are that sensitive you are probably not viable.  I do not want people to be arrested for making fun of me.  Of course as a white Christian male there is never going to be any speech laws to protect me from ridicule anyways, but criticism is healthy and good for a society.  There is no one and nothing that should be above criticism and ridicule.  There are no words that should be banned.  Physical harassment is one thing.  Invasion of privacy is also unacceptable.  But freedom of speech and expression is more important than anyone’s feelings.  There are no qualifiers on freedom of speech in the Constitution for a good reason. 

Stop the insanity.  If you are a sensitive milksop there are trained professionals who can help you.  Being sensitive is a personal problem, not a legal one.  Go and get help if you failed to grow up on your own, and keep your hands off my freedom.

Also, if you come from a religion that says people have to die for mocking your religion, then the US is probably not the country for you.  In the US we can mock any religion, belief system, or idea without facing a death penalty.  Chances are, your religion is probably not compatable with our values, legal system, and way of life. You have the freedom to believe and say whatever you want, but you don’t have the freedom to carry out violence against others for disagreeing with you.  If you can’t handle that then please go back to your sand box or whatever other backward hellhole you came from.

Once again I am purturbed but not surprised.  The government of Egypt has sentenced Florida Pastor Terry Jones (famous for burning Korans) to death, as well as seven Coptic Egyptians living in diaspora, mostly in the US and Canada.  They were convicted of “harming national unity,” attacking/insulting Islam, and spreading false information due to their involvement and alleged involvement with the home job movie “Innocense of Muslims”.  Under the new Muslim Brotherhood regime those charges carry the death penalty, which just goes to show what a crock their justice system is.  Out of all the charges the only one that is correct is that they attacked Pisslam, that Satanic child molesting death cult.  But I want to be very clear on something, Islam is not above scrutiny or attack.  Islam is only sacred to Muslims, if you can’t handle criticism without resorting to violence then you are a public menace which probably needs to be put down.

None of the information in that video was false.  If Muslims cannot face the fact that their founder is a child molesting murdering, and sometimes gay, rapist, then there are plenty of other belief systems out there which are infintely more humane and palatable than Pisslam.  If Muhammad is not a good role model then don’t follow him.  All this death sentence crap over a movie or talking bad about Islam only proves that the movie was spot on in it’s depiction of Islam.

Because of this death sentence, none of these people will be able to travel freely.  At any time they could be snatched and taken to Egypt for execution. 

I have nothing but disdain for Egypt, and I am enraged with Obama for giving my tax money to an organization which I believe should be hunted down and killed off to the last man.  I’m talking about the Muslim Brotherhood of course.  As soon as that craziness started in Egypt I knew that we were looking at another Islamic revolution, similar to what happened in Iran.  Anyone who seriously thought it was about democracy and freedom is either incredibly and fatally data-blind, or unbelievably stupid.  So now our tax money goes to persecuting Christians in Egypt, building mosques, and funding Islamic terror.  How many Christians and Jews are now being killed with money provided by American tax payers? 

I doubt any of this will phase Obama.  He will certainly continue to give money to those barbaric animals.  Obama is a Muslim, and he has put us under the Jizya tax.  For him it’s alms, but for us it’s Jizya.

I don’t care how many protestors Mubarrak might have killed.  More likely than not they had it coming.  1) It’s none of the US tax payers business what those barbarians do to each other.  2) When you act like a wild animal you run the risk of getting shot like one.  3) The only alternative to the secular dictatorship in Egypt was a religious one, and of course the religion is going to be Pisslam.  So now things are so much worse in Egypt.  So many more Christians are going to be killed as a result of this.

“Well don’t you care about the Muslims?”  No, not really.  I hate Islam, but to be fair, under the secular dictatorships Muslims could be as Muslim as they want.  Under the Muslim dictatorship they still can, but there is now no choice in the matter for other people. 

I don’t blame the Coptic/real Egyptians for wanting to have their own country.  They have to put up with vandalism of their churches and property, which cannot be repaired, they have to put up with forced conversions, rape, girls being kidnapped and forced to marry Muslims, and destruction of their property all the time.  They get no help from police, neighbors, or the legal system if there are any incidents with Muslims.  Also, no one is allowed to convert away from Islam to Christianity or anything else, because they can be killed for it.  The Muslims will never let the Coptic people have their own country because1) it would be a geographic set back for Islam (When Islam takes a territory it is against their religion to let it go.) and 2) they would rather force them all to convert to Pisslam.

I find modern Egypt to be a particularly sad joke.  The average IQ for Egypt is about 80.  They are not going to be building another pyramid any time soon.  For certain the Egyptian people used to be smart.  They were building pyramids, libraries, and monuments when the majority of white people were still building with sticks and mud.  At some point they went from smart to stupid.  I don’t have a definite date to assign to that point, but I would say it was when the majority of people in Egypt became Muslims (and no, I’m not promoting “black Egypt” or any other Afrocentrist rot.  Those people are nearly as crazy as Muslims and just as delusional).  When you habitually kill off intelligent people it impacts the gene pool over time, so that your population has less potential for intelligece.  Also, when you have an ideology which is both counter-intuitive and hostile to critical thinking you cannot expect to have a culture which achieves much.  Those two factors are what has decimated Egypt.

The only Egyptians with a cultural link to classic Egypt are the Coptic Egyptians, and they are continually under pressure to assimilate.  I believe that if the Coptic people had their own country it would quickly become an economic and scientific powerhouse.  It would be a bright beacon of intelligence, reason, freedom, and acievment.  Look at the vast difference between Israel and the surrounding Muslim countries.  It’s shocking.  I have spoken with both Coptic Egyptians and Muslim Egyptians.  The difference in intelligence is shocking.  The Coptic/true Egyptian is so much more coherent, knowledgeable, reasonable, and fluent, while the Muslim Egyptian is more like an angry petulant child who needs to be hit by someone. 

Yesterday I participated in a Yahoo poll which asked the question of whether or not taxes should be raised on the wealthy, and I of course voted against it, but I found that less than 40% of respondants had also said no.  I was extremely disappointed but not surprised.  After all, Obama basically campaigned on class warfare and a moral inversion.

Anyone who thinks there has been no moral inversion in the US needs to wake up.  I know that Obama promised lots of people free stuff, but there is no such thing as a free lunch.  Even if you don’t pay for it someone else does, and if they don’t want to pay for it but are forced to then you are a party to theft.  Theft is theft, a thief with a cause is no less a thief. 

Obama talked about fiscal responsibility, and everyone doing their fair share, but that is the opposite of what he wants.  What he wants is to punish people for being successful so that he can in turn use that money to buy more votes for his party, and he wants to destroy the economy of the US because he hates America. 

How can I say that?  Well, let’s look at this one thing at a time.

If a guy who makes a million a year has to pay 40% of his income to the government, and a guy who makes 20,000 a year has to pay 10%, then the guy who makes a million is paying more of a “share” in terms of both percentage and sum total.  So not only is he paying his share, but he’s paying other people’s share as well.  If Obama wants to hike how much that man pays then it’s not about him “paying his fair share,” it’s about him paying even more. 

“Well, you just like the rich people.”  No, I like the economy and I like jobs, and taxing the people who hire people, generate jobs, and taxing companies only takes money out of the economy, and it means less jobs.  The government does not generate wealth.  Money does not grow on trees, and the problem with spreading the wealth is that eventually you run out of wealth to spread.  This is why I say that socialism is trickle up poverty.  But I digress.

So assuming that the poll is correct, and people want to hike taxes, my next question is why should we give the government more money?  This administration, the Democrat party as a whole, and certain Republicans as well are NOT committed to fiscal responsibility.  IF they were, then they would be talking about cutting expenses.  If all the wealthy people in this country, including all the Hollywood and music industry wackjobs who support this administration, were completely broken and everything they had was taken, then it would not even put a dent in the Federal deficit.  The Federal deficit has to be taken down over time, and it requires spending cuts.  If any of these Democrats were serious about cutting the deficit then they would cut spending.  Whatever revenue is generated by any tax hikes they institute will be quickly spent on some useless garbage.  They keep increasing their spending, with no signs of cutting back, so why should we give them more money?  Giving them more money is not going to help the economy or the Federal deficit.

“But they want to cut the military and you guys are against it.”  Of course we are against it, because there are too many people in this world who want to kill us.  Yes we need to end the wars, but no, we don’t need to downsize the military.  Spending in other areas needs to be cut.

Why is Obama giving money to Myanmar?  What has that got to do with us?  “He’s being generous.”  No he’s not being generous.  You can’t be generous with someone else’s money, and we the tax paying people are not getting anything in exchange from Myanmar.  How dare this guy demand that we raise taxes when he is just going to immediately blow the money?  How dare he talk about fiscal responsibility when he clearly has no concept of what that means?

But what I really do not understand is how he is now giving money to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.  Yes Hamas.  Hamas is on the official terrorist list for the US, and this man gives them money.  You can judge the character of a man by the kind of people he keeps as friends.  A good man will have friends that are mostly decent.  A man who likes to drink and bang whores is going to hand out with similar sordid sorts of men.  Now how do we judge a man who is friends with murderers and genocidal maniacs?

When I found out Obama was giving money to Hamas I was completely horrified, but again, I was not surprised, because I never had a high view of this man.  My view of him has always been tempered by a realistic assessment of his actions first, and his words second.  The man is pure evil.  I am now convinced that if he were in charge during the 1940′s he would have been close friends with Hitler.  He probably would have sent Hitler tax payer money, just like he does for the Hitler’s of today.  Hamas is a maniacal terrorist organization.  They are the Nazis of today, but worse, because at least the Nazis could build a decent country with modern facilities, and the Nazis didn’t treat women as if they were subhuman, and the Nazis didn’t kill people for listening to music.

If Obama were about fiscal responsibility he would not be giving money to groups like Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.  Foreign aid needs to be cut before any talks about tax hikes are started.  People should not be hating on Grover Norquist, they should be angry with Obama and his party for making us pay the Jizya tax.  Obama needs to be held accountable for his mad spending.  Any money Obama gets in a tax hike is just going to be frittered away.

Of course, as a matter of principle no money should be going to groups like Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood.  I deeply resent my tax money being used to kill Christians and Jews, or to spread Islam, or build mosques.  The fact that Obama would give US tax money to groups that not only hate us but are 100% antithetical to our values and way of life just goes to show how much disdain he has for the US.  This is a Jizya tax, plain and simple.  This shows what kind of a man Obama is.

Obama thinks that everything in the country is his, and like a good Muslim he pays his alms with that money, but for us it translates to a Jizya tax.

Also, I don’t care how badly damaged Gaza was.  If you can’t handle a bloody nose then don’t pick a fight.  If I were in charge of Israel I would not have stopped until Hamas was completely wiped out, no matter who whined and threatened.  In fact, I really wish Israel would kick all of those savages out of Gaza permanently, but I digress.  When you go getting into fights you don’t know what the outcome is going to be.  Those terrorists picked a fight with Israel, so now they SHOULD have to deal with the consequences.  Why is my tax money being sent to these people?  What have they ever done for me, or for the US?  This is beyond stupid.  Obama should be arrested for this, he should be put in handcuffs and taken out of the White House straight to jail.  This is absolutely criminal. 

Obama would never be able to hold a job in the private sector beyond menial labor.  He could certainly never be trusted with finances.  Any company that put him in charge of finances would quickly go bankrupt.  You cannot spend your way out of debt.  When you are in debt you don’t borrow money so that you can spend more.  It’s insane.  In real life, when a person or a business is in debt then expenditures get cut.  If you are in debt you have to live on less, which means that maybe you don’t go out to see as many movies, or eat out as much, or buy a new sound system, or buy the nicest car on the market.  The government needs to do the same.  The money is not there.  Stop spending.  Stop the madness.  Stop giving money to our enemies that hate us and are Hellbent on our destruction.  Just stop.  I don’t want to hear any talk about tax hikes.  Without cutting spending tax hikes will do no good and plenty of harm.

The size of government needs to be cut, welfare needs to be cut, foreign aid needs to be stopped completely. 

First off, I want to say happy belated Thanksgiving to all my patriotic fellow Americans, and to all the liberals out there, happy turkey pardoning day.  I forgive you guys.

That being said, I want to address two items I saw in the news:

Zero Dark Thirty

“Zero Dark Thirty” is a movie coming out about the hunt for Bin Laden, which will involve scenes showing interrogation and “torture.”  Interesting how the liberals have been silent about “torture,” Guantanamo, and extending Constitutional protection to enemy POW’s since Obama took over, but I digress.  The movie is supposed to be highly accurate and well researched, and under other circumstances I would go see it, but these are not normal circumstances.

I for one, do not believe the story the media has spun about the Bin Laden kill.  Why?  Because it’s too suspect.  Where are the photos?  Where is the video footage?  Where is the body?  Where is the hard evidence other than the word of a few people I don’t personally know, and a shady administration which I do not personally trust?  The Bush administration got Saddam.  We saw photos of him immediately after his capture, we saw footage of him in prison, and we saw footage of his execution.  Why is it that we saw none of that for Bin Laden and why aren’t more people questining the alleged kill as a result?  Did it ever cross anyone’s mind that a high profile kill like is a huge plot convenience for the Obama administration, especially during a time of wavering popularity?

So the body was allegedly dropped in the water and all visual evidence of the alleged kill was supposedly concealed so as not to upset the Islamic world.  Another plot convenience if you ask me, to make up for a lack of evidence. 

First of all, if he doesn’t want to upset the Islamic world with Bin Laden’s death then why announce it?  Second, why is pandering to the Islamic world even on the priority list?  Obama is SUPPOSED to be the US president not the Islamic Caliph or some kind of Grand Mufti.  He doesn’t have any responsibility to them, but he has every responsibility to the US and the people here.  We don’t care about the savage child molesting acid burning religion/cult of death.  Those psychopaths are always angry and upset anyways.  I say if they want to cry all the time we should give them some things to cry about.  Let them be mad.  They already offended us to begin with.  What about us being mad?  I guess you don’t need to worry about things like that when you can rig an election.  Anyways we have the ability to bomb the entire Islamic world out of existence.  We don’t even have to put men on the ground in order to deal with them.

The fact is, there is more evidence for the resurrection of Jesus than there is for the official story of the death of Bin Laden.  I don’t buy it.  I know that some people will take offense to my analogy there, but even if I were not a believer I would still maintain that position, because it is absolutely true.  In both cases you have anecdotal evidence, but one has more anecdotal evidence than another.  Maybe some people will be upset with me for saying that, but it’s only because Obama is the “Jesus” of the liberals.  That is not just my opinion, it’s a hard empirical fact with documentary evidence to back it up.

I have a theory that there might be some human psychological need for a Jesus type figure.  It’s a fairly recurring motiff in movies and literature, and for whatever reason many liberals have latched onto Obama.

Wallmart

So a man was busted by two Wallmart employees and a security guard as he tried to make off with two DVD players.  The police arrived to find the man being held down by the employees, and when he cuffed him he discovered that the perpetraitor was dead.  The suspect was bleeding from the nose and the mouth, which could indicate that he was punched there, or that he was punched (or otherwised received blunt force trauma) lower down and the blood is an artifact of internal bleeding. 

I was wondering why a thing like that even made the news.  I saw comments on the article about biased reporting and attempts to steer sympathy toward the thief, and apparently it has worked on some level because I also saw comments denigrating the employees for fighting this guy on Wallmart’s behalf, which is of course corrupt and does not deserve to be defended according to the left.

Let me put it this way.  I have worked many retail jobs, and I did not enjoy ANY of them, but, if I caught some guy trying to rob the store I would do something.  If I caught some guy trying to rob the registers I would do something, even if the guy were armed.  Was it because I loved the job or the company?  No.  But it’s a matter of principle.  Theft is wrong, and I don’t want anyone to get away with theft if I can help it.  Justice is blind. 

It’s not that I am particularly brave (although compared with the average person it might seem so), it’s just that some things absolutely burn me, and in spite of my level of bravery or lack thereof, I am going to do something if I get steamed up enough and not think about the potential personal cost. 

Not all of the information is out yet, but as it stands my sympathies are with the employees rather than the theif.  I doubt it was their intention to beat this man to death, but regardless of that, this man would still be alive if he had not chosen to be a thief.  If this were a third world country and he were a starving peasant stealing food then that would be one thing, but DVD players are not an essential need.  I’m sorry if that hurts anyone’s feelings but they’re not. 

I really hope that this thing is handled better than the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman issue, which has made a complete joke out of the media, the justice system, and the state of race relations in the US.  If the theif is black and the employees are non-black you can bet this will become the next race issue, because black people kill each other all the time but when a non-black guy kills a black guy then it is all of a sudden time for national outrage and race wars, and the non-black guy suddenly becomes white, and white people suddenly become involved, and the non-black guy is guilty regardless of the evidence because the guy he killed was black. 

Anyways, let’s see what happens.

Source: http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/shoplift-suspect-dies-confrontation-walmart-workers-234946540–abc-news-topstories.html

I actually wrote this to an individual, but this is what I have to say to all Muslims:

You Muslims have more blood on your hands than anyone else in the world.  Your whole “religion” is based on violence and bloodshed, and that is how it spread in the first place.  You people don’t want freedom you want Shariah, and you want to impose it on the entire world.  The reason you don’t like Israel is twofold: 1) Because they aren’t Muslims.  2) Because they are Jewish.  That’s it.  Don’t pretend it’s about “human rights” when you have all those suicide bombers, acid burnings, honor killings, forced conversions, and mistreatment of minorities.  You just have your hijab in a knot because infidels have carved out an existence for themselves in the ME.

Let me teach you some facts:  Israel was the Jewish homeland before your people even existed, and before your religion even existed.  Israel is the only country in the ME that respects human rights and allows freedom of religion.  Israel was the first country to allow Arab Muslim women to vote.  You should be complaining about your own leaders rather than Israel.

By approving of Hamas I consider you to be an accomplice.  I imagine you also approved of the 9/11 attacks.  After the first war Israel took in all the Jews from across the Middle East, while the other Arab Muslim countries refused to take in the “Palestinians.”  Your own people should have taken you in.  The Jews are better people than you are.  Why don’t you ask your Arab Muslim brothers why they don’t take you in?  What’s the reason?  Take your argument to them.

Also, I don’t believe that you are a distinct people group.  You people are always insisting that you are all the same, all Muslim Arabs, and if anyone does something to any of you they do it to all of you, but then, all of a sudden, you are a unique and special people group when the Jews are involved, even though you speak the exact same language, have the same religion, and the same physical appearance as all the other Arab Muslims.

Moving on.  As a Christian I cannot ever take your side.  I know how you people treat Christians in the Middle East.  The only country that treats Christians as human beings is Israel.  Even though you believe in an absolute all powerful deity, you have no concept of basic inalienable human rights.  You only believe in the rights of the Muslim male to trample on women and unbelievers as he pleases.  I hold you responsible for the plight of Christians in Egypt.  I hold you responsible for the plight Christians in Iraq.  I hold you responsible for the persecution of Christians all across the Islamic world, ranging from Pakistan to Sudan. 

As a white and European male I will not pardon your religion for the sack and rape of Constantinople, or for the sack and rape of Persia, or the sack and rape of Spain.  I will not pardon your religion for all of the women of my race your people have kidnapped, raped and taken as wives against their will.  I will not pardon your religion for the Jannisary program. 

As a man who loves freedom I will not pardon your religion for Madrid, Mumbai, New York, or the Armenian Genocide.  I have no love or respect for your religion. 

Don’t talk to us about Israel until you get your own house in order, and you people have a long way to go.  None of you will get an ounce of sympathy from us. 

I have to say, I am beyond disgusted with the way the media has reported on the fight between Israel and Gaza.  They keep trying to portray the conflict as a series of human interest stories focusing on the “Palestinians” and are acting as if Israel started it.  I keep seeing talk about how Muslims in Gaza are mourning because such and such terrorist was hit and his family also got killed. 

Of course the liberal media never calls these guys terrorists, they always call them militants, even though the US government (Obama administration included) has officially classified Hamas as terrorists.  Maybe Obama is chafing about that but the point is they are still officially terrorists according to the US government, so there is no reason why the LM does not have to call them such. 

The LM also keeps quoting these random Muslims saying things like, “The more Israel attacks the more we support Hamas.” 

I want to make a few things very clear:

1) Stop calling these people militants.  They are savage terrorists who need to be killed.

2) Israel did not start this.  They have been under constant attack by Hamas, and the “Palestinians” have done nothing to reign in their own people, why?  Because they support what Hamas is doing, which brings me to my own point.

3) The fact that the “Palestinians” knew where these people were, and who they were, coupled with the fact that they neither did anything on their own to stop them nor reported them to the Israelites makes them accomplices to terror.  I therefore have not a single shred of sympathy for the “Palestinians” and I do not see any of them as innocent victims. 

Of course the UN, other muslims countries, and a variety of left wing politicians in western countries have all got their panties in a knot over this.  I don’t understand why Obama is sending Hillary, or why Germany is sending someone.  I don’t see any of these people trying to avert “catastrophes” over in Africa.  There are so many ethnic and religious going on ever in Africa that people don’t even know about.  So why do they fuss over Israel?

They fuss over Israel for the same reason the Liberal Media engages in biased coverage, because they are rampant anti-semites.  It’s not like the “Palestinians” have anything to offer economically or politically.  They are probably just as backwards as the average hut dweller in Africa or the Amazon rainforest, but they have a little more than that because Israel gives it to them.  Look at who the anti-semites are: the political left and that savage death cult known as Islam.  Muslims hate Jews because their pedophile “prophet” Muhammad (may piss be upon him) has instructed them to.  It’s similar to the reason why Christians support Israel: because the Bible says to.

Honestly, for me this is also a religious issue.  I tend to see this as Satans people attacking God’s country, but even if I were not religious I would still side with Israel.  Why?  Because the Muslims are the enemy of civilization everywhere, and the enemy of my enemy is probably my friend.  That is why the left allies with Muslims, because the left hates western civilization, so the see the enemies of western civilization as their allies.

I see talk from the left and from Islam about how Israel should stand down and take up doing nothing as it’s main strategy for survival.  Seriously?  How much should Israel have to put up with before they permanently lay the smack on these savages?  Let me put it this way.  In the US the Muslims blew up two of our buildings, in return we blew up two of their countries.  Leave Israel in peace and let them do what needs to be done.  I know Barack Osama, that Muslim commmie, isn’t going to do jack to help God’s chosen people, but my hope (perhaps in vain) is that he has enough sense to leave them alone and let them do what they need to do.

My guess is that Obama will try to help his Muslim brothers.  I don’t know how much more Obama has to do before all the Jews in America wake up and recognize that the Democrats are not friends of the Jewish people. 

If I were the president I would high-5 Netanyahu and slip him some weapons, and once he was finished dealing decisively with those God forsaken savages I would team up with him to do something about Iran.  And that’s another thing, the way Obama has handled the ME in general is thoroughly abominable.  He supports all these Islamic revolutions, but the one secular revolution in the ME (the Iranian green revolution) he is completely mum on.  How anyone can think this man isn’t a Muslim is beyond me. 

So apparently Obama’s idea of fiscal responsibility and trimming down the budget is to give away tax dollars to foreign countries in exchange for….

Well…

Nothing tangible.

Apparently Myanmar will be getting $170 million for 2012 and 2013 depending upon whether they institute the desired reforms.

This sort of thing should be up for a referendum vote.

I don’t want to hear Obama or any liberals who voted for him talking about how they are in favor of fiscal responsibility, when that is clearly not the case. 

Everything this man does only makes the country weaker.  It’s bad enough that we tax payers already have to support all the lazy people domestically and pay for the Obamaphone, and now this guy has to go and give our money to other countries as well.

What happens in Myanmar has jack all to do with us.  If you want to be humanitarian then that’s fine, but you can’t be humanitarian with someone else’s money.  If Obama wants to help them let him do it from his own paycheck.