Homeschooling is looking better and better:

OK so it looks like Obama is working to worsen our already fairly communist public education system.  For those who may not know, the Federal Government (which includes the Executive Branch) is supposed to have all of jack and squat to do with education.  It’s called the 10th Ammendment, and it says, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Education and the power to oversee education were never delegated to the Federal Government, which means that most of what the government has done with education is un-Constitutional. 

So what does Obama want to do this time?  He wants to meddle with education around the country.  The stated purpose is to bring underperforming urban students up to the same level as their suburban peers, and the way to do it is to redistribute wealth and add more Federal oversight. 

When I first read this I though, “what an idiot,” which is the first thing that comes to mind every time I read about something Obama has done or said.  But, it’s not so much stupid as it is insidious.  It’s stupid in terms of making the US a better place, but clever in terms of making the US a more communistic place.  Here is how communist leaders think:  Inequality among the citizens bothers them, as does citizens having freedom of choice.  They want to hammer down all the nails so that all the heads are flat, even if the nails are longer and the board isn’t thick enough.  That is their plan for the citizens, but they of course will exempt themselves because the only class division a communist dictator likes is the division between the ruler and the ruled. 

So let’s say he brings all the schools down to the level of the ghetto and equilizes everything.  Are his kids going to be affected?  No.  His kids will continue to go to whatever expensive private school they are going to, at tax payer expense, and with armed body guards.  He is a flaming elitist hypocrite. 

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-push-universal-preschool-proposal-142600889–election.html

More people are renouncing US citizenship:

Looks like more people than ever before are renouncing their US citizenship because of left wing policies.  This is an endictment against the left, and all the entitlement minded takers and government worshipping sycophants.  As I said before, the problem with spreading the wealth is that eventually you run out of other people’s wealth to spread.  Things cannot continue the way they are going if our country is to survive.  It is high production costs that have driven much of our production overseas, which was the backbone of the US economy.  Production costs were made high because of unions and taxes. 

High taxes cause people to move their business elsewhere, and themselves as well apparently.  I told everyone that high taxes are not good for the economy.  The higher the taxes the less people businesses can afford to employ.  The more businesses that shut down or move overseas the more people we have in the US who will be unemployed and underemployed.  Those problems are only compounded by immigration. 

“Oh those people are just greedy, we don’t need them anyways.”–OK, if they are greedy for wanting to keep their own money, then what does that make you for wanting to keep your money and for wanting to keep someone else’s money.  I think that if we use the same standard of judging greed, then that makes them greedy, and you greedy + parasitic.  And yes, we do need them.  When they go then jobs go with them.  Also, who do you expect to pay your welfare check?  Oh yes, and before you say “we will create our own businesses” let me just preempt you by asking why haven’t you already?  No one is stopping you.  If you have such a natural propensity towards being successful then what is stopping you?  Go and do it.

If you look at this chart you can see figures for the rate at which people renounce their citizenship:

Look at how it went up under Obama and the Democrats, and the huge spike in 2011.  The spike in 1997 was caused by dual citizens in Hong Kong giving up their US citizenship as Hong Kong reverted to China.  The spike in 2011 was caused by Barack Osama.

Now, I can’t help but wonder how this chart would look if they factored in people who were still US citizens but who have moved overseas for work. 

I have been toying with that idea myself.  Why?  Because the US is no longer the land of opportunity, and it is becoming less and less like that progressively.  The job market is crap here.  No don’t tell me it’s good, because it’s crap.  I have two degrees and a 4.0 GPA on the 2nd one, + good references, and still I struggle.  So many people are living on a fixed income, while the cost of living goes up. 

There are three things that keep me in the US, for now:

1. My family is here.

2. The 1st Ammendment.

3. The 2nd Ammendment.

I would like to point out that reasons 2 and 3 are under heavy attack by the left.  Once those go, then the only reason I have to stay is family.  But since I am getting married soon, and am a lower income earner, I may be going overseas for work anyways because I want to be able to have kids and a good life.  So, let’s see. 

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/should-you-renounce-your-citizenship-144048875.html

I feel compelled to address this issue because it is a common myth among liberals which they freqently take for an axiom and bring it up in debates.  Did Republicans and Democrats ever swith places or flip?  The answer is emphatically no. 

The Republicans were never a liberal party.  Out of the two parties they have always been the one which was more pro-Constitution.  The biggest problem with the Republicans today is that they are going along with the Democrats, which means that they are essentially seat warmers in DC, at best. 

The Democrats of the past were pro-slavery, and the Democrats of today are pro-abortion.  In either case the Democrats and much of their constituency violated the natural rights of a large segment of the population, based on subjective arguments on how they are less than human. 

I am not going to argue that some people are better off never being born, because that has no bearing on the issue of whether or not abortion is murder.  I am not going to argue that in the long run the descendents of the black Africans brought to the US as slaves are not better off than their cousins in Africa, they are, but that has no bearing on whether or not the institution of slavery is morally valid.  But the Democrat party does have a history of interpreting the Constitution subjectively.

In addition, I am 100% convinced that if the majority of liberals today were born back then they would be pro-slavery, because their tendency to subscribe to subjective party arguments about one segment of the population being less than human would still be there.  The Democrats of today are still pro-slavery to a certain degree with the way they want to tell us what to eat, what medical treatments we can have, where to go to school, what sort of education we can have, and so on and so forth.

I don’t want to hear about how the South was full of Christian conservatives.  The colonies founded for religious reasons were all to the north.  The southern colonies were established for the same reason that the colonies in Haiti and Cuba were established, which was mass production of cash crops.  Today there are very few Christian conservatives in the northeast, and the northeast is mostly Democrat as a result.  That is not to say that there were no Christian conservatives in the south, because there were, but they were not the rich plantation owners who held most of the political influence.  However, I am not going to say that the south was completely wrong, or that all of their reasons for secession were invalid.  I still agree with secession, and so did Robert E. Lee, who incidentally was also anti-slavery.

But the whole myth about the parties switching sides is just that, a myth.  The Democrats have simply changed their angle of attack, and the Republicans have decided to go along with them more and more.  If anything what we see happening is the differences between the parties becoming smaller and smaller, which is why I am probably going to completely stop voting for the Republicans fairly soon.  Last time the only one I voted for was Romney, and I voted libertarian for all the rest, of course, at that point it didn’t matter since they threw out my ballot. 

I’m thinking that “Middle Class” is actually a code word for “Welfare Recipients.”  After all, that is the only class that seems to be growing right now, and the only class Obama is helping to grow.

So I keep seeing articles about how the Fakestinians are angry over one thing or another.  I have concluded that if they are not the most worthless people in the world they are close to it.  This time they are fussing about Israel creating an exibit about Herod “the Great” in Israel. 

So I stopped to think about what that has to do with them, and the conclusion that I came to is that it has jack all to do with them.  Let’s go over it.  Herod was a Jewish “king” put in charge of the Roman province of Judaea, and Fakestinians are neither Roman nor Jewish.

Fakestinians self identify as “Arabs” and Arabs come from the ARABIAN Penninsula.  So the artifacts and the exibit have basically jack and squat to do with them.  Arabs are neither Jews nor Romans.

The basis behind their whining is the claim that the artifacts were taken from Samaria a.k.a. “West Bank.”  OK granted, but even so it still has jack all to do with them.  This would be like the equivalent of me getting upset about Native American archaeologists digging up ancient Cherokee arrowheads in Georgia.  I don’t give a rip snort.  It’s their culture, so they are entitled to those artifacts if they can find them in the ground.  It has jack all to do with my heritage, so why should I care if they collect their ancestral objects and put them on display?  “Uh… no, you guys can’t collect them, because I’m white, and I’m here and uh… yea…”  Sounds incredibly stupid yes?  That’s because it is. 

This is just bitching for the sake of bitching, very much like the leftists in the US.  Someone needs to tell them to shut it and keep it shut.

 

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/herod-great-show-israel-angers-palestinians-202213080.html

 

So Pope Ratzinger is going to retire now.  He cites old age, and diminishing physical and mental capabilities as his reason for retiring. 

OK so I’m not Catholic, and as a result I don’t closely follow what the Pope is doing, nor do I see him as an authority.  That being said, I would like to critique some of the things he did that were mentioned in the article:

“But his trip to Germany also prompted the first major crisis of his pontificate. In a university lecture he quoted a 14th century Byzantine emperor as saying Islam had only brought evil to the world and that it was spread by the sword.”

–Which is completely true.  It has brought only evil, and it was spready by conquest. Everywhere Islam has gone civilizations and cultures have been destroyed and replaced by barbarism.  The unparalleled Byzantine Empire was destroyed by them and replaced with that garbage country Turkey.

“After protests that included attacks on churches in the Middle East and the killing of a nun in Somalia, the Pope later said he regretted any misunderstanding the speech caused.”

–So after the Muslims proved that what he said was completely true, he apologized to them.  Those people are such barbarians. 

“In a move that was widely seen as conciliatory, in late 2006 he made a historic trip to predominantly Muslim Turkey and prayed in Istanbul’s Blue Mosque with a Turkish Mufti.”

–Now this part really blows my mind.  How do you pray with a Muslim?   If only that were a sick joke rather than a sick reality.   Islam is a totally different religion, with a different god, a different set of beliefs, a different set of values, and a different path to salvation.  So when they prayed together did they pray to Allah or YHWH?  I would like to know that.  Did the Pope mention Jesus when he prayed with that guy?  Probably not, because that would be considered blasphemy by the Muslims, and he would just end up offending them more.  I mean, why would he do that?  To me it seems like a show of subservience.  You wouldn’t catch me going into any Mosque to pray to Allah. 

“But months later, former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami met the Pope and said wounds between Christians and Muslims were still “very deep” as a result of the Regensburg speech.”

–Aww, boo-hoo.  Christians around the world have to put up with so much crap from Muslims, and they never apologize to us for a single thing.  Christians have to deal with random attacks and killings, institutional discrimination, forced conversions, rapes, kidnapping and forced marriage of Christian women to Mooslime men, and churches getting vandalized and destroyed.  If anyone has the deep wounds and a reason to be angry it’s us.  Muslims are not the innocent victims here, they are the aggressors.  What if Pisslam got made fun of by popular entertainment and the media as much as Christianity, or even half as much?  What then?  They would go insane with rage.  For the record, I think that we should make fun of Islam.  They need to have their attitude adjusted.  I guarantee they will behave better after a firm smackdown.

So here is my advice to the next Pope:  Don’t do what this guy did with the Mooslimes, and by that I am of course talking about placating and sucking up to them.  They are not your congregation, and in fact they are pagan moon worshipping cultists.  You are not responsible for their behavior.  It’s not your job to show subservience, or to please them.  If the goal is to convert them then you don’t convince someone to convert by telling them that their own beliefs are completely correct.  Doing stuff like that makes you seem like less of a spiritual leader and more of a politician/goof/clown.  That’s not leadership, it’s politics.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/pope-resigns-saying-no-longer-strength-fulfill-ministry-112923467.html

A friend of mine shared this article with me.  This is a very serious issue, on multiple levels, which needs to be addressed.  I am going to post the entire article here, and follow it up with my commentary:

Acid Attacks Arrive in West, Feminists Maintain Silence

by W.F. Price on February 3, 2013

I read another anti-Israel article published by the ridiculous media.  The title of this article is “Palestinian Officials: Obama Must Pressure Israel.”

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/palestinian-officials-obama-must-pressure-israel-182405729.html

This is another article that attempts to portray Israel as the aggressor and the “Palestinians”/Fakestinians as innocent victims.  Anyone who knows anything about the situation there, regardless of which side they prefer, knows that the Fakestinians are anything OTHER than innocent victims.

First of all, I find it 100% dishonest and hypocritical for the Islamic world to pretend that there is any such thing as “Palestinians” and that they are some unique people group that needs to be protected.  They are always going on about how everyone is Arabs and Muslims, and how if they aren’t then they need to be.  They are constantly working to Arabize and Islamize the indigenous people of North Africa (Coptic Egyptians and Berbers), so it’s a dirty lie straight from Satan that they care about preserving any unique or indigenous people groups.  Dirty satanic agenda based lie.  Notice I’m not saying “from the pits of Hell,” like a lot of people will, because I don’t believe Satan is in Hell, I believe he is in the Middle East or the UN building in NY. 

It’s ridiculous how they are always talking about how they are all Arabs, all Muslims, all one people, so if you mess with one of them you mess with all of them.  Oh but then the “Palestinians” are a unique and precious people which need to be protected.  The only difference between the Fakestinians and the Lebanese or Syrians is that they are more violent and rowdy.  Also, the Palestinians really are just Syrians and Jordanians, who happened to immigrate to the land that was given BACK to Israel.  But I digress, the point is they are hypocrites.

The Fakestinians are innocent in the same way that my 2nd dog was innocent when she knocked over the trash can and spread the filth across the kitchen floor.  The dog was the only one who got into the trash, so any time it happened we knew who it was.  Same goes for the Fakestinians, we know who has the blood oath to obliterate Israel, and who, in general, believes in making war on non-believers. 

So the Fakestinians want Obama’s help?  They want the Jews out of West Bank (Samaria), let’s not forget that the Samaratins were whittled down to a small number by thos savages, and that they have had to move to Israel proper in order to stay alive.  How dare they try to present themselves as the natives of Samaria when they drove the natives out?

What the Fakestinians want is for Obama to force Israel to remove the Jews from Samaria.  But let me lay it out, Bush leaned on Israel to remove the Jews from Gaza, and they did.  But rather than things calming down in Gaza they have only gotten so much worse.  Hamas took over completely, and they started launching missiles and crap into Israel.  Because that is what Islam is.  Islam spreads by force, and they believe that once Islam takes an area it is never supposed to revert to infidels.  So when you give them something, rather than pacifying them they step up their efforts to get more.  We can see from Gaza that pulling out doesn’t help things.

I am glad that Netanyahu has ignored Obama’s “advice.”  Obama is a piece of crap.  I don’t know what all this talk is about the “international community” disapproving of Israel. 

What the mess is the “international community”?  What is this nebulous construct that the ridiculous left wing media keeps referring to?  Do they mean all people outside of Israel or just people outside of Israel who disapprove of Israel?  What do they mean?  Because, I’m not an Israeli guy and I strongly support Israel and have nothing but loathing and condemnation for their enemies.  Everyone I know personally also supports Israel.  In fact, I get the impression that in spite of the shoddy yellow journalism most people in the US support Israel.  I also know for a fact that India supports Israel, and has strong economic ties with them.  So where is this crap coming from?

Are we talking about China?  Yea, there’s a great country for human rights.  If it’s China then they need to clean up their own house before talking about anyone else.  How about freeing Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Manchuria?  How about they stop killing and torturing Christians there?  But I can guess who they are probably talking about.  They are most likely talking about the Islamic world, and the liberals in Europe.  The liberals in Europe can get bent.  I don’t see what Israel has to do with them, unless they just have their panties in a knot because their ancesters didn’t kill enough Jews back in the 40′s. 

If you are an atheist, agnostic, or deist living in Europe then you don’t have any reason either religious or economic to give a rip snort about whether the Jews or Fakestinians are in charge of Israel.  There is no oil in that area, so it’s not going to affect your gas prices, and don’t pretend like it’s about human rights violations, because the Muslim side has a bad track record on that which beats out anyone else in the world.  How many more acid burnings and honor killings need to happen in Europe before you people get the message?  Oh but yes, I forgot, you guys think that it’s all your fault the Muslims are violent because you guys are white, and everything that’s wrong in the world is the white man’s fault.

I hope that Israel continues to settle Samaria, and I hope that the Jewish people who go there will have lots of kids.  Settle it up Israel.  In fact, if I knew of a charity that donated money to the settlers then I would donate to it.

Also, why should Israel have to share Jerusalem with the Muslims?  I see these people whining about how Jews are settling certain parts of Jerusalem.  Well, why should Muslims get any part in Jerusalem?  Which part of Mecca is going to go to the Jews?  None?  OK then they don’t get a piece of Jerusalem.  Who do these people think they are, having such gall?  They are lucky that I am not in charge of Israel because I wouldn’t put up with half the crap from them that Israel does.

I find it endlessly disappointing, but not at all surprsing, how hostile Barack Osama and the Dems are toward Israel.  But you know what, Israel is right not to listen to Obama.  Even if Israel loses the US government as an ally then they still have God on their side.  The recreation of Israel is a fulfillment of prophecy, and God isn’t going to let them be destroyed, not by anyone in the world.  Not by any savage durka durka’s, and not by any self righteous dope smoking hippies.  Israel will survive, but some of the blessings of God will be withdrawn from the US.  Just like how the same percentage our our population was displaced by Katrina as the percentage of the population of Israel which was displaced by the forced relocation of settlers in Gaza. 

I saw this flagrantly disrespectful entry on Datingish called “Stay! Sit! Play Dead!” and it was advice for women on how to train their man.  They were attempting to draw an analogy between dog training and inducing a desired behavior in the man.  This entry has to be one of the most disgusting and disrespectful things I have seen in a long time.  Imagine if a man had written an entry like that about women, where everything was the same except for the genders being reversed.  The feminists, and the majority of other women, would eat his brains out. 

I am going to repost it here before they take it down:

This post was submitted by Alison Seymour.

Today I spoke to a married friend of mine who complained about her husband’s apathy towards helping her out around the house. She wishes he complimented her more, that he would be more motivated to get into shape for her, etc. Her struggles reminded me of the hilarious book, “What Shamu taught me about a happy marriage,” written by the brilliant Amy Sutherland.

Amy writes:  “My husband Scott is well read, adventurous and makes me laugh: I love him. But he’s also forgetful, untidy and a terrible time keeper. He suffers from serious bouts of spousal deafness, but never fails to hear me when I curse him under my breath from afar. Some years ago we took possession of Dixie, an eight-week-old excitable puppy that I took to obedience class. Over six weeks, I watched her transform and marveled at how I had managed to change and control another species. I wrote in my diary: ‘Try on husband.’ I did – and it worked.” 

The goal here isn’t to try to control someone else but really to learn how to make your boundaries known and stick to them so you won’t one day be repeating my friend’s wish list as your own. 

Nagging won’t work, not only will it not work but it’s counterproductive. Dog trainers don’t nag their pets! Instead of pointing a finger, make a big deal about rewarding the behavior that you like and ignore the rest, and do so on a consistent basis. Punishing the behavior you don’t like will most likely lead to more of that behavior. Animal trainers use a technique called L.R.S, which is the Least Reinforcing System, this is where trainers will act completely aloof when the animal does something wrong.

L.R.S is based on the principle that any response fuels a behavior so if there’s no response at all, the behavior will decrease over time. If you want to reap the benefits of L.R.S, you gotta bite your tongue when your guy does that thing you hate. Use this opportunity as a test of your patience – breathe in, breathe out, namaste. We are all reward-seeking, and nobody likes to feel bad about themselves.  Eventually your dude will naturally stop doing the things you hate because it will get him nowhere. He will do more of the things you want him to do because it will be in his best interest to do so as it will result in special dinners for him and extra attention between the sheets. Ta-da, winning!

How do you feel about this form of ‘training’? Has it worked for you? Would you try it?

Source: http://www.datingish.com/771567708/stay-sit-play-dead/?page=1&jump=1528025629&leftcmt=1#1528025629

First of all, you don’t go to strangers with your relationship problems.  You resolve them between you like adults, and if you can’t do that for any reason then one or both of you is not cut out for being in an adult relationship. 

Second, what the mess is spousal deafness?  Oh… is he untidy and a poor timekeeper, my heart just bleeds for you.  Oh yes it does… OK not really.  So he still manages to hear when you curse him?  Why are you cursing him in the first place?  Where is your sense of propriety?  Try cursing your husband or complaining about his untidiness in a non-white country.  Pick any non-white country.  You know what you will get?  A smack across the face, and if you don’t like it there is nothing you can do.  You can’t take him to court, and if you try then they are just going to tell you to shut up and stop wasting their time.  If you’re in an Islamic country you might get an acid shower for cusring your husband.  There is no man more demonized than the white western male, and at the same time there is no man who treats women better, on average, than the white western male.  That is why we have the highest level of interracial and international marketability, because in spite of all the PC bullcrap, most women are aware of this FACT.  But I digress, if she is cursing her man, then there is a fatal flaw in the relationship with either her, or him.  Since she is the one talking about it online my guess is that it’s her. 

I used to have girlfriends that talked about me online, even though I bent over backwards to make them happy and give them whatever they wanted.  That was before I woke up fully to reality.  When you spoil someone like that, they come to feel entitled, and rather than appreciate what you do for them they treat you like crap when you don’t do it or if you don’t do it fast enough.  We see the same thing from the welfare crowd.

I still can’t get past the dog training analogy.  I like dogs.  In fact, in general I like dogs better than I like humans, but talking about training a man like training an animal is both degrading and backwards.  You don’t train a man, you find someone who you can deal with and you deal with it.  If you can’t deal succesfully with anyone then it’s probably a personal flaw.  Who died and made that woman so special?  I don’t believe in putting women on pedistals.  If you treat them like a queen then they will treat you like a servant.

To me, this article is reflective of the sour rancid and domineering attitude that a lot of women have these days.  I said a lot, not all, so there is no reason to scream.  But when it comes down to things like this, I am reminded of why I decided to look overseas for a bride rather than domestically.  And yes, I caught some flak when I told certain people about what I was doing.  I got flak from feminists who were angry with me for bucking their carefully established boundaries, and I got some grief from “white knights” who told me that I was being disrespectful to women here, or disloyal (If you listen carefully enough you might hear the sound of me not caring).  I also caught some crap from white supremacists who said I had a duty to reproduce white children no matter how much crap the woman puts me through (hey there’s an idea for you extreme feminists, you can hook it up with the white supremacists).  But at the end of the day, I believe that my decision was the correct one. 

The fact is, there is such an impetus in our culture to degrade men.  If you look at the TV shows you can see that the man is always getting in trouble with the woman, and that he’s afraid of his wife, and the intelligent and crafty wife is always having to chastise and correct the foolish and wayward husband.  What kind of message does that send?  They also portray fathers in a negative light in a lot of the teen and tween shows.  The father is always out of touch, and has to be set straight by his kids and his wife. 

Our culture is not well, and the changes the left has made to our culture are anything but progress.

This is all backwards.  I wasn’t planning on ranting on this next, but after seeing this I had to say something.

So John McCain commented saying that Ahmedinejad was a monkey.  The comment was in reference to the fact that the Iranian government has sent a monkey into space and that Ahmedinejad said that he wants to be the first Iranian in space.  McCain said, “So Ahmadinejad wants to be first Iranian in space – wasn’t he just there last week? “Iran launches monkey into space”"

McCain was immediately attacked and called racist and insensitive by another Republican senator, Justin Amash.  OK, let me make two things clear.  First of all, I don’t care about McCain, he is a punk, but I also don’t care for all this sensitivity bullcrap.  The comment was not racist.  Ahmadinejad is a stupid looking guy, and he has sticking out ears just like Bush Jr.  If it’s not racist to call Bush a monkey based on his looks + low intelligence then neither is it racist to call Ahmadenijad a monkey. 

Ahmadenijad looks like a monkey, and he is a serious enemy of ours.  Why spare his feelings?  He’s a punk.  Also, the US government defines all persons indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa as white, which I don’t think is justified but it does, so in US government-speak this isn’t racist, since McCain is also defined as white.  I think that Iranians and Armenians should be classified as white but not Arabs or Turks.

Also, I doubt that the majority of Iranians would take offense to Ahmadinejad, a.k.a. Little Hitler being called a monkey.  Most patriotic Iranians will tell you that Little Hitler is actually a Turk, and that his Farsi is not proper.  Little Hitler was the enemy of the Iranian people before he was our enemy.  Most Iranians do not want to be associated with that punk Durkadinejad.  A lot of them are irritated that this clown has come to be the face of Iran as far as the international community is concerned.

Little Hitler should be disrespected.  I’m tired of being told that we should respect and show sensitivity toward people who deserve neither.  At some point the insanity has to stop.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/mccain-iran-president-monkey-161256673–politics.html;_ylt=ArXqJMz5cD88ZPUgbjA.wfDNt.d_;_ylu=X3oDMTUwZXYzY3NpBGNjb2RlA2N0LmMEbWl0A0FydGljbGUgTW9zdCBQb3B1bGFyBHBrZwM0MzYxODFmNC1lNzYyLTM5YjgtYjgxOS03OWMyOWIxYjUwOWQEcG9zAzIEc2VjA01lZGlhQkxpc3RNaXhlZE1vc3RQb3B1bGFyQ0FUZW1wBHZlcgMzY2YzMmU4My02ZWYxLTExZTItYWZmNi1lMWVkM2I0M2UyY2Q-;_ylg=X3oDMTQwcGpvZmQ0BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDNjBmYjBmZjMtNDdmMy0zNTNjLWExN2UtNjI5YmI4NzdiOTg0BHBzdGNhdANwb2xpdGljc3x0aGV0aWNrZXQEcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QDaWJfc2t5c2NyYXBlcl9yZWxhdGVk;_ylv=3

This ought to be enough to make any sane and/or non-retarded person never vote Democrat again.

Source: http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/04/16843014-exclusive-justice-department-memo-reveals-legal-case-for-drone-strikes-on-americans?lite

Instead, it says, an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”

As in Holder’s speech, the confidential memo lays out a three-part test that would make targeted killings of American lawful: In addition to the suspect being an imminent threat, capture of the target must be “infeasible, and the strike must be conducted according to “law of war principles.” But the memo elaborates on some of these factors in ways that go beyond what the attorney general said publicly. For example, it states that U.S. officials may consider whether an attempted capture of a suspect would pose an “undue risk” to U.S. personnel involved in such an operation. If so, U.S. officials could determine that the capture operation of the targeted American would not be feasible, making it lawful for the U.S. government to order a killing instead, the memo concludes.

And yes, they do want to deploy drones over the US.  It is on their list of things to do.  The fact is we have an unlawful adminstration which sees us as their enemy.  We have an adminstration who is loyal to outside forces, such as the UN, who opposes both our sovereignty and our personal freedom.

A recent Department of Defense report to Congress as well as a number of media investigations have exposed government plans to deploy tens of thousands of drones over the US mainland in the coming years.

An investigative report published over the weekend by the Christian Science Monitor cited the government’s own estimates that “as many as 30,000 drones could be part of intelligence gathering and law enforcement here in the United States within the next ten years.”

Source: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2012/06/dron-j18.html

Anyone who would still seriously consider voting for the Democrats again after this egregous affront to our freedom and privacy has to be out of their mind, retarded, or demon possessed.

Both Obama and Eric Holder should have been impeached and kicked out a long time ago.  They are both scum.  Even the ACLU, which is well known to be a crack pot ultra left wing organization, recognizes the danger of this.  The parameters the Obama adminstration presents are highly subjective, and could be stretched to include anything.  Of course, they could kill whoever they want with these drones, and simply not reveal any more information as to why the operation took place than they care to.  This is a huge crock.

The Republicans are worthless for not holding these enemies on US soil accountable.  What are the Republicans doing?  They never should have given Obama a moment’s peace.  They never should have dropped the birth certificate issue, or Fast and the Furious.  Now we have Benghazi, and on top of that this.  Also, let’s not forget how many of our enemies Obama is giving money to, and let’s not forget about Agenda 21.  Why aren’t the Republicans doing anything about agenda 21?

Anyone who shoots down any of these drones is a hero in my book.  Please shoot the drones down guys.

Now we also have micro drones to worry about:

LONDON (AP) — British soldiers in Afghanistan have been issued with surveillance drones so small they can fit in the palm of a man’s hand.

The Scandinavian-designed Black Hornet Nano weighs as little as 16 grams (roughly half an ounce) — the same as a finch. The 4-inch (10-centimeter) -long helicopter is fitted with a tiny camera which relays still images and video to a remote terminal.

“We used it to look for insurgent firing points and check out exposed areas of the ground before crossing, which is a real asset,” said Sgt. Christopher Petherbridge, with Britain’s Brigade Reconnaissance Force. In a statement, he called the Hornet easy to operate and said it offered “amazing capability to the guys on the ground.”

The military said Sunday that the toy-like Hornet is capable of flying even in windy conditions.

It said the Hornet was developed by Norway’s Prox Dynamics AS as part of a 20 million-pound ($31 million) contract for 160 units with southern England’s Marlborough Communications Ltd.

Drones of all shapes and sizes have rapidly become a mainstay of U.S., British and other nations’ military operations around the world. Late last year the U.K. said it was doubling the size of its armed drone fleet in Afghanistan to 10 with the purchase of a new batch of Reapers.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/uk-sends-hand-held-helicopter-drones-war-zone-101428321–finance.html

This reminds me of something I read in Revelation:

³ And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.

⁴ And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.

⁵ And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion, when he striketh a man.

⁶ And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

⁷ And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men.

⁸ And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions.

⁹ And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle.

¹⁰ And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months.

–Revelation 9:2-10

When I was a little kid the book of Revelation always terrified me.  It is full of such frightening imagery, much of which is difficult to imagine, and the most frightening thing about it, is that it is yet to come.  But another frightening aspect, is that it is going to come with world government. That means that there will be no place to go to get away from all of this.  Or almost no place, there may be some free enclaves of people that will be continually hunted, and there MAY be some places where the control is not quite so absolute, but we can’t count on maybe.

That being said, I found this particular passage especially disturbing when I was younger. What does it mean? When I was young I concluded that it was talking about some kind of hideous biological monstors, because the morphology of the creatures are all refrenced in biological terms. Tails like scorpions, bodies like locusts, faces like men, etc. What does it mean? It sounds like a horrible nightmare chimera.

But let’s think about it. Whatever these things are they are metallic (verse 9), and even though they have some insectoid characteristics they do not eat (verse 4). Or at least, they do not eat such things as are the normal eating habits of locusts.

What could make a sound like many horses running?   A chopper blade, like what we already have on helicopters today.  I think that what John the Revelator was talking about was some kind of drones.  Think about it.  If you have a 1st century man being shown modern, or futuristic technology then how is he going to describe it without all of the modern jargon being available to him?  He is going to compare it with things that are present in his time.  If it’s something that moves, then the comparison is going to be to biological life forms.  Such a man might describe a TV as a moving tapestry.  He might describe an airplane as a metal bird which shouts like thunder as it flies.  Think about it.

That’s all I have to say on this one.