So today I went to the post office and when I parked my car I noticed a Muslim woman with a tightly wrapped hijab getting out of her car.  I have to admit, every time I see one of those women driving it blows my mind.  Seeing a Muslim woman driving, and by herself, is about a surreal as it would be to see Richard Dawkins in a church participating during a worship service.  It seems incongruent that her husband lets her drive, alone, while still making her cover up everything but her face and hands.  I have seen this a few times.

Anyways, whenever she gets out of her car the first thing she does is unload a stroller, and I think “Of course.”  They have to come here and have their kids.  That way, when the Jihad comes to America it will be a grassroots movement. 

This is going to sound bad, but honestly, I wish the Muslims would truly become liberals instead of just voting for liberals.  If they became liberals then the abortions and homosexuality would seriously cut into their birthrate.  Just like it has set white people on a crash course with extinction.  It’s pretty common to see Muslims with small children and/or lots of children, but you very seldom see a white woman pushing a stroller these days.  You can see them out walking dogs, and sometimes out running, but I can’t remember when the last time was that I saw one out pushing a stoller.  Yes I know that not all Muslims are Arabs.  There are some white people in Islam but that doesn’t really help anything.  There are also black people and Asians in Islam but they are all the same to me.  All are security risks to have around.

But back to Muslims become liberals.  If they did, then they also would cease to be militarily aggressive.  Liberals are only violent domestically, not internationally.  If Islam became liberal then Islam would no longer be a threat.

When I see these hijab women and their families I think “invasion.”  It’s true that the US is an immigrant nation, which was built by immigrants, but the Islamic immigration is different than the historical immigration.  Historically the majority of immigrants we had would assimilate.  They would come here and become a productive part of the economy and culture.  Muslims don’t do that.  They come here and they bring their medieval culture with them.  Fleeing from oppression?  I don’t think so.  If you are fleeing from oppression then you don’t bring the oppression with you.  I’m talking about the hijabs and burkas.  They are certainly not part of a persecuted minority when they are the majority in their native country.

Why are they here?  They are not persecuted in their homeland, and they are not making any attempt to assimilate, so what does that leave?  Invasion, plain and simple. 

It’s funny how liberals will use made up words like “homophobe” and throw them around as pejoratives in debates, while other liberals will use words like “faggot” and “cocksucker” as pejoratives. I have been called “homophobe” so many times, implying that I am scared of homosexuals and that to be scared of them is a bad thing. Actually I am not scared of them, I am disturbed by them. But I have also had them call me “faggot,” “cocksucker,” “teabagger,” and a variety of other negative terms used to refer to homosexuals and homosexual acts.

So liberals, I ask you this, is it a good thing or a bad thing to be homosexual? If it’s an insult to call someone a homosexual then it must be a “bad” thing yes? Bad in a moral subjectivist sort of way I would assume. The same goes for the vast array of other sexual accusations liberals like to level.

I think with liberals many of them really do have gay tendencies, and they are so inculcated in sexual filth and deviance that they simply cannot imagine that anyone else has never done those things. By “sexual filth” I am talking about any kind of sexual relation which is un-Godly, including sex before marriage.

I have never:

1. Had sex
2. deliberately looked at anything pornographic
3. had any desire for an underage child, relative, or animal
3. Had any remote interest in participating in or watching any kind of homosexual act.

I would like to have sex someday of course, but it will be after marriage.

Also, I find it endlessly humorous when liberals threaten or offer me violence. First of all, why are you going to talk about shooting me when you don’t believe in gun ownership? Second, please, there is no way I can feel intimidated by threats of brute force from someone who I could easily bench press. I realize that liberals ride mostly on emotions, but if your emotions are leading you to commit a violent act then I suggest you think twice, especially before going after a meat eating conservative.

I wanted to talk about this article about a white supremacist who is running for sherrif in Bonner County Idaho.  I don’t have much to say about the article, as much as I do about the comments people are making and some of the responses I have received on there. 

As for the article itself, the only reason this “event” is receiving any attention at all is because the liberal media can use this as an exuse to put “white supremacist” and “Republican” in the same sentence or paragraph.  This is indirect propaganda by the LM in order to make their team look better (but it doesn’t work on intelligent people).  In a rational world this would not be newsworthy.  Who cares about Bonner County?  What does Bonner County Idaho have anything to do with anything other than Bonner County?

To be honest, I don’t really care for the white supremacist movements for a variety of reasons.  I also think the wooden shield, white robes, and all the other paraphanalia is a bit childish, and people who are obsessed with racial purity are OCD in my opinion.  I have had people argue with me that I should marry someone who is completely white because I am completely white, even if that person is ugly and/or does not share my religious beliefs, but if I have to marry someone who is ugly or a slut then that’s not really improving conditions for the children I would have.  BUT, on the other hand, people need to realize that “anti-racist” is a code word for anti-white. 

The left is not a friend of the white race.  They continually demonize and villify us as a means of propaganda.  They set us up as an enemy to bash and rally against as a means to get votes.  They have backed us into a corner, and we have gone along with it, to the point where everyone is allowed to have an advocacy group and to be proud of their heritage and history except for white people.  They give a free pass to groups like the Black Panthers and the black “Nation of Islam” which is lead by that nutjob Farrakhan.  Seriously, both groups have admitted to hating us.  That makes them HATE groups.  HATE GROUPS.  I’m getting tired of the bullcrap double standard, I really am.  People can talk about Black Pride, Asian Pride (usually Asians don’t because they are civilized), Mexican Pride, whatever, but as soon as someone says White Pride everyone is picking up rocks.

The left keeps bringing up white supremacist groups, which really do nothing other than put on stupid costumes and complain about stuff, while giving a free pass to Muslims and the various non-white supremacy/hate groups like La Raza or the Black Panthers.

Now as for the idiot comments people have been leaving.  I am seeing comments about how the government should take away their kids, white people owe blacks and maybe some other groups, white people are an “oppressor class.” etc.

In short what I have to say to that is BULLCRAP bullcrap BULLCRAP Bullllcraaaaap…

I’m not going to apologize for colonialism or slavery because I had nothing to do with it.  If we are going to hold people responsible for things that their ancestors MAY have done then Muslims owe white people around the world some hardcore reparations, especially the Turks.  For that matter so do the Mongols.  The Turks and Arabs destroyed our two greatest civilizations (Byzantine Empire and Persia), ransacked and destroyed priceless religious and cultural monuments, defaced churches, raped, killed, and enslaved many of our people.  And they never let up!  The Muslims are still attacking us today.  But how many white people are talking about this?  None, or very very few.  In any case it’s stupid to hold people responsible for things that they had nothing to do with and had no control over.  Also, not that it really matters, but my ancestors had jack squat to do with colonialism and slavery.  They were poor starving immigrants who came over during the 1900′s.  All this talk about reperations is just hate mongering and political propaganda.  It’s all about making up an enemy to knock down, and using their money to continue to buy votes.

White people are not an “oppressor class,” if anything we are a feeder class because so many other people are dependent upon us.  We give away more in welfare and foreign aid than anyone else.  No one treats racial, ethnic, and religious minorities half as well as white people do.  Try going to China or Saudi Arabia and talking about how you are an oppressed minority and they should give you welfare and see how far you get.  Not very far. If we are guilty of anything it’s being too soft and too accepting.  All this rhetoric is just to pigeonhole an entire race in order to maintain a corrupt political system.  Most white people are trying to get by.  Many of us are struggling very bad, and desperately trying to get started in life, but we have no advocacy groups or affirmative action.  In fact, some of us get passed over for jobs in favor of people who are less qualified because of affirmative action. 

I have never oppressed anyone in my life.  Right now I am only making $10/hour, even though I have been through college TWICE.  I’m tired of getting blamed for Hitler, slavery, and colonialism.  More white people died because of Hitler than anyone else, and white people are the ones who stopped Hitler.  White people also chose to end colonialism, but in retrospect maybe we should have kept it up.  After all, the 3rd world seems to miss us so bad that they now pour into our countries in the millions.  Maybe in the long run they would have been happier if we stayed.

This is all crap.  I am sick of how the media and the left in general keeps blaming white people for everything and stirring up hatred against us.  If you want to report on white supremacists then fine, but don’t forget to deal with the Black Panthers and La Raza.  After all, you people are always talking about equal opportunity.  You journalists should practice what you preach.  Dirty yellow journalism.

That’s all for now.

Here is the article:

White supremacist sheriff candidate says he’s just a “concerned citizen”

By Eric Pfeiffer | The Sideshow – 4 hrs ago

Pictures of Donald Trump’s sons posing with the corpses of animals they killed in a hunt cause outrage among fruitcake liberals.  I was reading this article, and they described the pictures as “grisly.”

Animal rights advocates are fired up over photos of Donald Trump’s sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, posing with trophy kills while on a hunting safari in Zimbabwe last year. In the photos, posted by TMZ, Trump’s offspring are shown standing next to dead animals including, most disturbingly, a crocodile hanging by its neck from a tree and an elephant, next to which young Don stands, proudly holding the animal’s hacked-off tail. (Yes, stomach-turning). The elder Donald Trump half-heartedly defended his sons’ hunting interest, and Don, Jr. has been feverishly responding to criticism via Twitter, writing that he has “no shame” about the pics. “I HUNT & EAT game.”

Source: http://now.msn.com/now/0313-trump-sons-hunt-animal.aspx

It’s not disturbing, stomach turning, or grisly, it’s just sport, and they are doing nothing illegal.  In the comments below people were calling them sickening, among other things, and really getting enraged over this.  What is sickening is how women are being treated in the Islamic world, or how religious and ethnic minorities are being treated in the Islamic world.  What is sickening is how liberals support grinding up unborn babies, and pushing back the date on when it is legal to grind up the babies.  What is sickening is how some of them want to kill babies after they are born and are campaigning for that.  What is sickening is how the left condones and gives free passes to these behaviors but get’s all bent out of shape over some animals being shot.  It’s not stomach turning when someone holds up a tail that they severed from a dead elephant, it’s stomach turning when some insane Muslim cuts off his wife’s nose and ears because she tried to run away from a forced marriage.  If anyone wants to see stomach turning then you need look no further than the abortion clinics.  It’s not a crime to shoot dumb animals in the wild when it is legal.  It is not a human rights violation, and it’s not sick.  How do you think ancient civilizations fed themselves before there was animal domestication?  Grow up. 

Now I don’t support animal cruelty.  When I saw some videos of dogs in China getting skinned ALIVE it made me mad.  If I saw someone doing that in front of me I don’t know what I would do.  I really don’t.  But there is really no comparison here.  These guys killed some animals and butchered them AFTER they were shot.  People who have a problem with this need to grow up.  It’s not any more disgusting than what happens between the ranch and the grocery store.  I realize there are people who get offended by that, but get serious, we have to eat, and our way of killing lower life forms is far quicker and more peaceful than what happens to animals in the wild.  I wonder if the liberals would change their stance on gun control and shooting animals if they were alone in a swamp or safari with an alligator or lion.  I doubt the alligator would care about their goofy activism one way or another.  “No no, please don’t eat me!  I’m on your side!”  *CHOMP* 

Maybe someone should start a “plant advocacy” group next to defend innocent plants, that cannot defend themselves or run away, from sweaty 100 pound liberal vegens who wantonly slaughter them without mercy.

I wanted to elaborate on why I have no sympathy for sluts, but first, some biological facts.

Testosterone is the biological chemicle responsible for sex drive in both men and women.  In both men and women mild amounts of testosterone are produced in the adrenal glands.  In men larger amounts of testosterone are produced by the testicals, and in women additional testosterone is produced from the ovaries.  On average women carry about 1/7 the amount of testosterone in their bodies that a male body produces in ONE DAY.  Unless a woman is on steroids, then there is no way any woman can even begin to imagine what it is like to live with the male sex drive.

All the cartoon and comedic representations of men drooling, having accelerated heart beats, having bugged out eyes, and generally going nuts are all based on truth.  Testosterone production for men peaks at the age of 40, on average, but it is teenage boys and young men (early 20′s) who have the most difficulty dealing with it because it is relatively new to them and they have yet to learn how to control it.  When an attractive woman walks by a man it can cause a tingling in his mouth, if she gets closer his heart rate goes up.  It becomes harder to think, thoughts become clouded and incoherent and are replaced with desires that cannot always be verbalized.  It’s like there is a raging beast screaming to be let out and do… whatever, and that beast tears at his intellect.

When the beast first emerges in the early teens, girls (at least the attractive ones) are no longer just people with longer hair, they are irresistable magnets that draw you in with almost tangible cords.  If an attractive girl is sitting next to you then you can forget about paying attention in math class, if she accidentally touches you then you can forget about sitting up straight in your desk.  Even if there is no attractive girl around it is not necessarily a repreive, the mind still wanders as the beast tugs on it and the imagination runs, creating it’s own imagery (this is another reason why the Islamic idea of keeping the women in tents is pointless).  The adrenaline surges through the body, parts of the body tingle, the heart rate accelerates, something inside feels like it’s going to burst, and it’s always there even in the calm moments, scratching at the back of your mind.    It’s a strong urge, similar to having to go the bathroom after having drunken a gallon of water strait.  No emotions are necessary to act on that urge.  The only way to cope is to put chains on the beast.  Chain it up through rigerous mental discipline, logic, and moral understanding.

As the chains are forged it becomes easier to live with and easier to push aside.  It becomes easier to think and to be around women without suffering a reduced and clouded thought process, or embarrassing and annoying physical side effects.  But make no mistake, if the beast is ever let out for one encounter it is very hard to get it back in place.  Even under the best of control and the highest level of civilization the beast is still there scratching at the back of your mind without ceasing.  The best one can hope for is to reduce it to white noise.

Women need to understand this.  Men do not need to have their emotions involved in order to have sex.  Men have strong rutting instincts, which urge them on to tap every attractive female in sight.  Men do not respect “liberated” women/sluts, they merely use them to satisfy their rutting instincts, because most men want to engage in uncomitted sex.  Men will tell a woman whatever she wants to hear in order to get inside her pants, and then when the man has what he wants he’s off to the next conquest.  I had a friend who told me that before he was Christian he wanted to tap every kind of woman in the world at least once so that he could maximize his experience and feel different varieties of pleasure.

With women it’s different.  For women the sex drive is tied in with the emotions, and women usually have to be emotionally stimulated or involved before they engage in sex.  Or at the very least women have to derive some level of emotional satisfaction from the sexual encounter, and will seek it out for that reason.

I myself have never had sex, but for me it was a choice.  I never had sex because I never got married, and for now I am not married because I am not making enough money to support a woman, much less a family.  I am therefore being responsible and throwing some more chains around the beast rather than exposing myself to STD’s or causing someone to get pregnant.  I know that at least some of the liberals who read this will say, “Oh it’s just because you’re ugly.”  First of all, that is most certainly not the case, and second, even if I were ugly it would be irrelevant because ugliness does not pose the same level of impediment to men that it does to women.  A man whose only ambition is a sexual encounter can get it even if he is 100 years old (assuming he wants it), there is always some insecure woman that will give it up in order to feel validated on some level.

So when I hear women saying that they “can’t help it” or that it is “such a strong urge,” I have to call bullcrap.  If there are men who can help it then any women can help it. 

Here is our sex drive:

Here is yours:

Don’t tell me you can’t control it or that it’s hard to control, because that’s a flagrant lie.  Take your Little Pony on your worst day and multiply it by 7, and that’s what the average man has to deal with.  Women don’t struggle with their sex drive, they struggle with their emotions.  Emotions are to women what sex drive is to men.

Our emotions:

Your emotions:

I know a woman might have a hard time controlling her emotions, but not her sex drive.  Women have sex for emotional validation, men have sex to satisfy a strong biological urge.  I don’t want to hear any woman saying she can’t control it.  Also, I find it to be a huge turn off when women act like they are primarily interested in sex more than a relationship.  I find it disgusting and backwards, because they are acting like a man.  I would much rather be with someone who says “Aww” uncontrollably when something mushy happens in a movie than someone who continually talks about how they want to grope my junk.  It’s not natural for a woman to be like that, which means that it’s either just a show or there is some kind of physical imbalance in the woman which probably needs to be treated medically.  Similarly I doubt many women want to be with a guy who weighs 100 pounds, eats nothing but celery, and cries during a movie. 

That is all.

I just wanted to comment on the “scandal” over Rush Limbaugh “insulting” that girl Sandra Fluke.  For those who do not know, Sandra Fluke is a law student at a Christian school.  She was speaking in favor of Obama’s health crap bill that will force Christian institutions to provide coverage for contracpetive services to employees and students, which includes certain types of abortifacts.  She complained that he contraception needs to be covered by her school or the government because it’s too expensive for her to pay for herself. 

So there we have it.  I don’t consider what Rush said to her to be an insult, because in order for something to be an insult it has to be incorrect.  If I tell the 700 pound man he is fat am I being insulting or am I being real?  If I say a quadruped walks on all fours am I being insulting or am I being real?  If I call a woman who has sex outside of marriage with multiple guys a slut am I being insulting or am I being real?  What else do you call someone like that?  You can’t call her a lady because she isn’t one.  She is a slut by any definition.  The fact that she wants to get paid for her sluttery makes her a prostitute.  So Rush is right on two counts.  But to be fair, when he said that she should publicize videos of her encounters that was going to far.  I don’t think it’s good to encourage that sort of perversion, and I would rather not see that anyways.  But she is a slut.

I hate it how the liberals are trying to make this an argument for “women’s reproductive rights.”  First of all, I hate it when the left talks about rights at all because they have no objective source of morality, and they believe that rights are something which the government legislates to people.  If you think morality is nothing but opinion then don’t argue that any behavior is right or wrong.  You cannot make an argument base on opinion.  That would be like me trying to argue why Star Trek is better than Babylon 5, or why apples taste better than bannanas.  It’s stupid and hypocritical for moral subjectivists to argue morals.  Second, the left needs to realize that they do have the freedom to engage in their polymorphous perversions, but at the same time you don’t get to do any bloody thing and expect other people to pay for it.  Why should someone else have to bear the consequences of your poor judgment?  What is wrong with this woman that she wants to go to a Christian school, flagrantly violate their moral code, and expect them to pay for it?  And why is she interested in contraception in the first place?  At 30 her prime reproductive years are already gone.  Her ovaries are already starting to collect dust.  It’s time to find a man and settle down, and maybe put on a dress and grow some hair on that head, and focus on being a little bit less of a slut.  Maybe not give it up on the first date or give it up after one milkshake. 

Whatever.  Our country is becoming a joke, the laughingstock of the world. 

What is going on in Egypt? Is it moving towards greater freedom or greater insanity? I think it is safe to say that it is moving on towards greater insanity. From the looks of things, the people who are protesting are not protesting for freedom, but for more Islam and to a lesser degree socialism. As ironic as it may seem, the best sort of government people in countries with a Muslim majority can hope for is military dictatorship. Why? Because the only other alternative is an Islamofascist dictatorship. As soon as they switch to Democracy the hard line Islamic fundamentalist party will win the election. The extreme Muslims outnumber the secular Muslims and religious minorities because their birthrate is a good deal higher, so when it comes to voting they typically have the majority.

The protesters in Egypt are complaining that the military has formed a dictatorship and that it is unjustly persecuting them and calling them thugs and rabble. But the truth is, THEY ARE THUGS AND RABBLE!

Durka! Durka!

One of the first things they did when Mubarak was ousted was attack the Israeli embassy. Why? Because they are thugs and rabble, and their religion of Islam tells them both to hate Jews and attack infidels. Their minds are not even capable of understanding why the Israeli embassy was there in the first place, or how international politics work because the most they can understand is “Dar al Islam” and “Dar al Harb.” They divide the world up into the place of Islam and the place of war. First they want to get rid of any non-Islamic presence in their own country, then they want to spread their fascist ideology across the world. That is how Islam spread in the first place, and the people who spread Islam to begin with were just as backwards, ignorant, and violent as the average Muslim today. They have done nothing but drag down every country they have invaded.

When I look at pictures of this “revolution” I see a lot of idiots screaming, and I’m seeing lot’s of women wearing foolish rags on their heads (hijab) as well as a few men wearing the chafiyeh. The chafiyeh is the rag that Yassir Arafat always wore. It shows how a person identifies. Nomadic Bedouin (Arab) tribes and Saudi political officials also wear it. When a man wears the chafiyeh it shows that he self identifies as an Arab. In the case of Saudi’s it’s just their culture, but in the case of characters in Mediterranean Islamic countries it shows that they WANT to identify with the rapists and murderers who invaded their country and forced their ancestors to convert. I do not understand why anyone with Egyptian ancestry would want to self identify as an Arab when their true heritage is so much more noble. If it were me I would rather self identify with the people of the pharaohs, who built some of the worlds oldest monuments, calculated the circumference of the Earth with almost perfect accuracy, and acted as a repository for science and learning. I would much rather associate with that than with desert barbarians who drank piss and destroyed irreplaceable libraries and monuments, raping and killing in the name of their false god.

But the unfortunate truth is that the majority of modern Egyptians have little or nothing to do with classic Egypt in terms of their culture. I am not saying this to give credence to the myth of racial replacement that the Afrocentrists are teaching (which is complete garbage), I am saying this to underscore the fact that Islam destroys not only the native religion(s) but also the native culture.

When the Muslims invaded Egypt not everyone was immediately converted, in fact most were not. The majority of Egyptians were Christians and had their own church which was at least as old as the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. The Arab Muslims formed an elite ruling class and taxed the native Egyptians who they called “Gepts.” The Egyptians referred to their country as Aegeptus (Ah-Gept-us), but the Arabs called them “Gepts” because they could not pronounce the name. In time the word “Gept” changed to “Copt.” Those who were too poor to pay the Jizya tax had to convert immediately, but the rest would convert over time through intimidation, beating, and institutional persecution. During the middle ages a sultan by the name of Al Hakim decided to kill all of the dogs in Cairo. To Muslims dogs are an unclean animal, it didn’t matter at all to him that those dogs were the personal property of the people of Cairo and that the families who owned them probably had an emotional connection to them as well.

Other tactics included kidnapping Christian women and forcing them to marry Muslim men. Muslims were forbidden to convert to Christianity but Christians are encouraged (and sometimes forced) to convert to Islam. For a long time Christians were not allowed to build new churches or even repair the ones they had, which was a shame on multiple levels because Coptic/Egyptian architecture is so much more interesting and artful than Islamic.

When a Copt converts to Islam he or she gives up his Egyptian identity and looks to the ME for his sense of identity. When they pray to their false moon god they turn their butts to their native country and their faces towards Mecca.

Today in modern Egypt much of this continues. Coptic children are forced to go to public schools where they are forced to learn and recite Islamic scriptures. For a while the Coptics created their own private schools but Nasser shut them down. Muslims have no concept of religious freedom, tolerance, or separation of religion and state. Also, in the public schools they teach foreign languages such as English, French, German, and Spanish, but they refuse to teach Coptic which is the native language of Egypt. It is not good enough that they destroy Christianity, but they also want to destroy all vestiges of the native culture, which is truly sad and shameful. Many Copts are forced to live in garbage, literally, like the Zebaleen community.

I find it backwards that these thugs would have the gall to call themselves martyrs, when they clearly have no understanding of what a martyr is. The Coptic people they are killing all the time are martyrs. A martyr is someone who dies for their religion rather than be forcefully converted to another, not some idiot who threw an explosive bottle at a group of police. You don’t get to call yourself a martyr when you use force to spread your beliefs and then get killed because the people you are attacking want to defend their home, family, and way of life.

So I have no sympathy for the thugs who are getting beat up and shot by the police, because even as they are being roughed up they are shooting, beating, and raping the Copts. There have been incidences of drive by shootings outside of a church, and killings during riots. Killings in the name of Allah, the false Arabic moon god. All the thugs are getting from the police is a taste of their own medicine, and the misery they receive is the same misery they would release on the world if they were given the chance. They just want to turn their country into an even more miserable place. People in western and eastern countries where Muslims either already exist and/or are immigrating to need to be aware of this. They need to look to the Middle East and North Africa and ask, “Is this what we want for our own country? Is this compatible with our values and way of life?” I am dead serious on this, and people need to wake up already.

I just read this article on yahoo: http://news.yahoo.com/us-marines-posed-nazi-symbol-afghanistan-185101573.html

It is regarding some troops that had their picture taken in front of what looks like a Nazi SS symbol on a flag.  The troops have stated that they thought the symbol stood for Sniper Scouts.  But of course there are lots of angry people calling for the troops to be punished. 

What I want to know, is why there is a media push to make our troops look bad?  Why publish stories that depict our troops in a negative light?  In this case it has already been determined that the use of the flag was an innocent mistake, and that the soldiers were not going to be punished.  So why publish this?

“First we have Marines peeing on dead bodies and now this,” Weinstein said.

So what?  The bodies were already dead, and who cares anyways?  I remember hearing that story and not thinking that it was news worthy.  I don’t know why the media is always trying to come up with stories to make our troops look bad.  If they gave our enemies the same kind of scrutiny or attention that they give our troops, who are protecting us from those savages, then no one could care whether they pissed on some dead bodies or accidentally displayed a Nazi symbol.

Camp Pendleton spokesman, Master Gunnery Sgt. Mark Oliva, said he did not know where the flag came from but it was likely the property of one of the Marines in the photograph.

Or maybe they got it in town.  There are white supremacists and Nazi sympathizers in the 3rd world.  Especially among the durka durka’s who hate Jews at least as much as Hitler did.  And honestly, as bad as Nazism was it’s nothing compared with Islam.  The left just likes to bitch about Nazism more because white people were responsible for that, and they are able to use it as a spring-board for launching their cultural Marxism.  But in reality, Islam is far more cruel, violent, and psychotic than the Nazis were.  It’s just that the Nazis were methodical and organized, while the Muslims are generally stupid.  If the Muslims ever became as organized and as advanced as the Nazis were then the world would die.  That’s it.  I’m not saying that we should forget about Nazism, because there are many lessons that can be learned from that, but I’m really sick of Islam getting a free pass. 

I could remind people of 9/11, or I could talk about the Bachi-Baz (boy molesting) culture, the way they spray acid on girl’s faces for the heinous crime of going to school, the child marriages, the persecution of religious and ethnic minorities, the wife beating, or how they make women ride on the trunk of the car, but I won’t.  Instead I am going to just refer you to some images of what they do (Warning, content is extremely graphic):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h_RaXdvlTY&list=WL5E2287F713FDF904&index=7&feature=plpp_video

Just for the record, I couldn’t even make it through that video.  So I have no sympathy for these demon worshipping child molesting wife beating savages.  There is nothing our soldiers could do to them that they don’t deserve.  Seriously.  They participate in every form of depravity imaginable.  There is not a worse group of people in the world.  They are worse than the most savage tribes in the jungles of Africa or South America. 

That being said, I wish the government and the media would back off our troops and let them do their job.  No more of this prosecuting them because they may have hit an Afghan, or pissed on a dead body.  Who cares?  They deserve it.  I’m tired of seeing liberals get all indignant and “outraged” over things like this.  It is easy to criticize the job someone else is doing when you aren’t doing it yourself.  You liberals are not the ones out fighting to prevent the atrocities I have shown from becoming a daily fact of life in our country.  If you are so offended by the job that our soldiers are doing, then go and enlist yourself.  Otherwise shut up.  I don’t want to hear it.  I’m tired of hearing it. 

Yesterday I saw something disgusting on TV.  ABC news was on and as I was passing through the room they suddenly showed two women making out.  It was the most disgusting thing I had ever seen on TV.  Of course my dad changed the channel immediately but it was too late, the image was already burned into my mind. 

Since when did it become acceptable to show that kind of sickness on TV?  Where is the FCC?  Who said they could show that on TV?  What if someone had their children with them while they were watching the news?  It just goes to show how vile and perverted our culture has become.  Actually, it is not our culture, it is the culture of the media.

I also wanted to know why something like that was even considered newsworthy, because without taking agenda into account it seemed entirely random.  However, it is not random.  The media jackals are self appointed social engineers.  They are pushing both a cultural and a political agenda.  The reason they probably chose that particular gay couple is becuase the way they made out was somewhat reminiscent of an old yet famous picture taken at the end of WWII:

I do not know the exact circumstances behind that picture, but basically WWII was over and the soldiers were happy to be home and glad that the war was over.  They were ready to pursue tranquil domestic lives, and get married and have children.  That is where the “Baby Boom” generation comes from.  People celebrated the war in different ways, and obviously this soldier was glad to be back home, and this photo was considered significant and newsworthy.  So what sort of message is the liberal media trying to convey with the lesbian make-out scene?  Where are they going and where are they trying to take us? 

It is disgusting.  Have things decayed so far that we can no longer even let our children watch the news? 

In general I do not understand the left wing obsession with homosexuality, and why they are always rubbing it in our faces.  They are not fascinated with every form of sexual sickness or they would be showing us incest and beastiality.  I believe that they are anti-family, anti-Christian, and anti-reproduction.  Not only does homosexuality violate the laws of God and nature, but it also produces no children, and it mocks the institution of marriage and family.  Of course, perhaps if we give them enough time they will give attention to the woman who likes doing it with horses.

So a year after Obama signs an arms reduction treaty with Russia they are coming out with a new missile defense system and a 100 ton ballistic missile, which will probably house the father of all nuclear warheads. Maybe something that can generate an explosion the size Texas for all we know. They are even calling it the Satan Missile.

Of course when I read that Obama signed an arms reduction treaty with Russia I knew that the US would reduce it’s missiles, and Russia would keep it’s missiles. Of course, I assumed that they would continue to stockpile in secret, I did not anticipate this kind of “in your face” disclosure. So who knows what else they are doing behind the scenes?

I sometimes wonder what it would be like to be a liberal. I really do. I wonder what it’s like to live in an imaginary land of gumdrops and lollypops, where common sense is a vestigial organ (that’s a multilevel pun). I wonder what it must be like to have everything so completely backwards and not be aware of it on any level.

I mean, I cannot overemphasize how backwards liberalism is on every level. It is fiscally backwards, morally inverted, and strategically suicidal. So what made Obungle assume that Russia could be trusted? Why would any leader with an ounce of sense scrap any of their countries defenses? No one does that unless they are stupid and/or suicidal. Of course there is the possibility that a leader might be trying to take the country down with him. Some of the Roman Emperors were pretty insane.

Obungle could learn a lot from watching movies, seriously. For example, the hero and the villain are shooting at each other from around different obstacles.

The hero says, “If you put down your gun then I will put down mine.”

The villain says, “No way, do you think I’m stupid? You put down yours first and then we will talk.”

The hero says, “Alright, we will both put down our guns at the count of three and both come out.”

So is the villain going to drop his weapon? Probably not, in fact he is hoping that the hero will be dumb enough to drop his, because that gives him a huge advantage and makes the kill a lot easier. If the hero is dumb he comes out and gets shot, but most of the time the hero is playing a trick on the villain or he is at least expecting treachery.

Obama does not even have half that much sense. He needs to stop weakening us in front of our enemies (weakening the military, killing the space program), and giving money to our enemies (Islamic countries). Everything he does is the equivalent of bending over and slapping his rear in front of an attacking dog. All he does is make it easier for our enemies to kill us, they do not care that they were shown compassion or mercy. And the truly ironic thing is that he was mocking the Bible for the place where Jesus said to “turn the other cheek.” He was saying that that would be a horrible source of policy for defense. Well, right now he’s turning up the butt cheeks and slapping them, which is so much worse.

If we don’t get rid of him and all his cronies soon then we will not have a country left.

More on the Satan Missile: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/moscow-eyeing-u-missile-defense-plans-announces-100-194904097.html