May 17, 2013

• Brainwashing and White Genocide

  I never expected my entry on white decline to get all the attention that it got, but that’s cool. The more people that read it and see it, the better, even people who disagree and are inclined to disagree.

  I must say that I was not at all surprised by the uninspired and highly predictable comments posted by leftists. Many of us have known for a long time that the left is inherently biased towards white people, which is why the majority of us, in the US at least, do not vote for the Dems (which is the left wing party here). If you are white you have to be absolutely insane or delusional to support any sort of left wing party. We have been targeted for destruction by the left. We have been targeted by economic and legal policies which are enabling and facilitating our decline. The goal is to economically and politically disenfranchise us.

  Here is how the left is doing it:

  1. Their most deadly achievement was to sour the relations between the genders. This is the main reason why I decided to throw in the towel and marry out. The well is poisoned.

  2. Weaken the family so that marriages do not last, or form in the first place.

  3. Make reproduction costly. Not only are we burdened with taxes, but the cost of medical care is already high to begin with. While we struggle to get by, our government takes our money and gives it to other people in exchange for them not working. In addition, illegal immigrants drive up the cost of medical care because we end up having to pay for our bills and theirs. Having children is expensive, and paying more taxes and more for medical care does not help. I don’t see why my money should be forcefully taken away and given to support someone else’s kids/indiscretion. I should be able to keep my money and put it towards my own kids.

  4. Reduce the amount of money that men bring home in terms of real wages. This was accomplished by teaching women that having a career and earning money was more important than staying home and having kids. Now not only are men seldom able to fulfill the traditional role of provider, but they also have to compete with women for jobs just to get by on their own.

  5. Put laws in place which are discriminatory and politically marginalizing. Of course I am talking about affirmative action and quotas, none of which work in our favor, especially not for white males. Being a white male is more of a liability than an asset when one goes to look for work.

  6. Quell any attempts at discussing the matter or bringing the problem to light. This ensures that the issue will not be addressed, and the malefactors will therefore be able to continue with their agenda as popular support and social pressures will prevent people from holding them accountable. It is every despot’s dream.

  Many of the responses I received illustrated how successfully the left has programmed people, and not just the hordes of liberal bots/followers, but also other people as well who are normally unsympathetic to the left wing agenda (in other areas). The left has done a good job ensuring that the issue cannot even be discussed, and without legal action they have managed to get average people to do their police work for them. This is truly sinister. Any attempt to discuss the matter elicits a Pavlovian type response of crying racism, which prevents the accuser from assessing the data critically, and may also similarly deter any bystanders.

  It is also worth noting that most of the responses I got failed to address any of my actual points, and were instead targeted at addressing things that I was allegedly implying. For example, I never said anything against race mixing, and in fact I mentioned in the entry that I was doing it myself. I spite of that I had accusations of being opposed to race mixing, which indicates that the Pavlovian response was able to completely interfere with reading comprehension, so that many people never made it to the stage of assimilating or addressing what was actually said.

  One commenter made a point which I found particularly insightful. Being attracted to other races is fine, but it is not a moral duty to marry with other races, nor does doing so convey any sort of superior status to the participants. I would also add that it is not a moral duty to allow the 3rd world to pour into our country and to pay their expenses, or to send out hard earned money to their countries. No such obligation exists. Anyone who insists it does is trying to elicit some sort of socio-demographic change. That is their agenda, because it is impossible to advocate such a position without anticipating the results unless one is incredibly retarded.

  Not only is being concerned about white decline “racist” but acknowledging it is similarly considered racist. Any sort of white advocacy or enlightened self interest is considered “racist” as well. The refusal to acknowledge and discuss the issue is highly similar to how Muslims and actual white supremacists will frequently deny the Holocaust, or dogmatically insist that it wasn’t so bad.

  A lot of white people have been programmed to view their history negatively, and to believe that they deserve to be punished or marginalized. Any white person who thinks that white decline is either not a problem or is a good thing has a certain degree of self hatred/loathing. The term is oikophobia (fear of self), and it is akin to Stockholm Syndrome. If people want to hate/loath themselves then that is fine with me, but keep it personal and don’t project it onto others. Oikophobia is a mental disorder, regardless of whether mainstream psychologists choose to acknowledge it as such or not. It stems from the same impetus which causes other self destructive behaviors like anorexia, binge eating, and cutting.

  Being ashamed of yourself for being white, is shameful. So if you didn’t have something to be ashamed of before, you do now. You don’t owe anyone anything just because you are white.

  If I had mentioned that some obscure tribe in Africa was going extinct, there would not have been a single accusation of racism. People would have looked at what I said, assessed it, and decided whether or not it mattered after having reviewed the data and arguments involved, or they would have simply ignored it entirely. If anyone stopped by and left a comment about how it didn’t matter that the tribe was going extinct, or that it was a good thing, then others would have chimed in with accusations of racism, bigotry, heartlessness, etc. Again, people have been conditioned to be anti-white, and equate white self advocacy with racism.

  I find it especially interesting how people who are not white sometimes insist dogmatically that it white decline is not a problem and that we should not be concerned over it. I am not going to call attention to any particular individuals, because I am civil, but I am going to put out a hypothetical scenario. Imagine if the tables were reversed? What if black people were going extinct (actually their numbers are growing, but play along), and there was a black man trying to call attention to it? What if I went to his page and told him that it was a good thing his people were going extinct, that it doesn’t matter, or that he should be happy over it, then would that be racist? How would any bystanders react? Think carefully. Of course he would be upset with me, and would probably take that comment as racist and personal on some level. Such a reaction would be understandable.

  It’s normal for most people to not want their group to be obliterated. It has to do with the human survival instinct, which is one of the few instincts that human beings have. It takes some extra effort to obliterate a people group and get members of that group to cheer as it’s done. That sort of behavior is not natural, it has to be conditioned. So the question is why was that conditioning set in place and who is responsible?

  • 10:32 pm
  • 8 Comments