I just have one question, where is Captain Obvious when you need him?  Can someone please send Captain Obvious to Washington DC? 

I’m really tired of these jokers wrecking our country, economy, and way of life, and then turning around saying that it’s for the best.  Word to idiots, when you’re struggling economically you have to CUT SPENDING.

So supposedly the Republicans and Democrats have struck some kind of deal over the “fiscal cliff.”  I almost dread to see what it was.  I have been disappointed with the Republicans on a mass scale recently.  Not only have the failed to in any way restrain or remove Obama, but they don’t even bother to resist him.  It’s all just a show, to make it look like they are actually doing something there, when really all they are doing is keeping a seat warm at tax payer expense.  Any show of resistence they put up is just that, a show.  It’s a sham.  They didn’t even try to win the presidential election in 2008, and they didn’t try that much harder in 2012.  Even with the media campaigning for Barack Osama and all the election fraud and ballot stuffing they still should have been able to nail him by a landslide.  No president has ever done more impeachable things than Obama.  They never should have let the birth certificate go, or Obamacare, or the various undeclared wars, including the war we are about to get in over in Syria.

But I digress, we all know that the Democrats only wanted to keep the tax cuts to people with lower wages, FOR NOW, but apparently there were increases in government spending that were going to expire and the Dems have campaigned to keep those.  According to the article I read economic “experts” have stated that a decrease in government spending would hurt the economy during a recession.  Word to dumb twats, government spending is a drain on the economy not a boost.  If Washington were serious about fixing the economy they would massively slash spending and let that money actually STAY in the economy.  Government does not generate wealth, and putting the government further into debt doesn’t help anything.  Increased government spending during an economic recession means that inflation is going to happen. 

I don’t understand this stupidity-insanity combination.  Who is it that seriously thinks you can spend your way out of debt and does that on a personal level?  When you’re in debt you don’t increase spending, you cut back.  I don’t know why these morons can’t understand that, UNLESS they actually do understand and are deliberately trying to wreck the economy here, because that is what they are doing.  Maybe that is what they are doing in order to fully institute communism, because Obama’s guy John Holdren was recorded saying that one of their goals was to de-develop America, and one of the best ways to turn a good country into a 3rd world craphole is to destroy the economy. People need to wake up and start recognizing the Democrats for the traitors and subversives that they are. They don’t have an ounce of loyalty to the US, they all like that internationalism/globalist filth, and of course the UN.

The Republicans aren’t that much better. Can we please get an alternative to the Republican party? Worthless good for nothing sell outs they are. If I were in charge of the Republicans I would have told Obama and those Commiecrats that there wasn’t going to be any God forsaken deal. NO DEAL!  I would have told those villains that we keep all the tax cuts or nothing.  You don’t negotiate with terrorists and enemies who are out to destroy your culture, freedom, and way of life.  In fact, I would not have stopped there. I would have also demanded that we keep the tax cuts but let all of the spending cuts take effect, because basic common sense level reasoning says that when you are in debt you DON’T SPEND MONEY. 

I know I’m tying in all caps a lot for this entry, but so many people are blind to the obvious, and I don’t know how to make it more apparant.

Alright, I’m off to go try to do something that will chill me out for a while. I can only take so much of those traiterous idiots and their brown nosing media lackeys.

Happy New Years guys.

Source: http://news.msn.com/politics/update-white-house-gop-reach-a-deal-on-the-fiscal-cliff

http://start.lenovo.com/tv/3/player/vendor/Zazoom%2C%20LLC/player/fiveminute/content/christmas/asset/gnrc_18101153/

So apparently a man was arrested for telling kids that there was no such thing as Santaclause.  Of all the stupid things to get arrested for.  Of course, they wrote it up as disorderly conduct, but the conduct was yelling out that there is no Santaclause in a public place.  I’m sure there will be lots of sensitive people and liberals who think this is a good thing, but this is actually a horribly bad thing.

I cannot overstress that it is not the role of government to protect anyone’s feelings.  I don’t care who gets their feelings hurt.  My freedom of speech does not end where your feelings begin.  Newsflash: There is no such thing as Santaclause.  There was a Saint Nick at some point in time, but he died a long time ago, and the modern commercial construction of Santaclause is completely false. 

“Oh but the kids feelings will get hurt!  They will get their hopes crushed!”  So what?  When were you planning on telling them that there was no Santa and that you lied to them for years?  Would they get their feelings hurt then?  How much credibility do you think you will have with your kids after having come out as a liar to them?  I don’t understand why anyone lies to their kids about Santa in the first place.  It seems absolutely sinister to lie to your children about anything for years.  Why would you want to convince your children to believe in something that you know for a fact to be false, and how can you expect to still have credibility with them after having outed yourself as a liar.  Great job.  I don’t understand it at all, especially coming from Christian parents.  The Bible equates lying with witchcraft, and says consistently not to lie.  “Thou shalt not lie” does not mean, “Thou shalt not lie to anyone except for your kids because you think it’s cute to have them believe in Santa or the Easter bunny, or whatever mythical commercial dieties your society may have created to exploit your wallet.”  Liars are also going to be among the first people into Hell.  When/if I have my own kids I would be terrified to lie to them deliberately for so many years.  I don’t know how people can do it.

But I digress.  It doesn’t matter whose feelings get hurt.  Freedom of speech means that you can err any opinion or belief without having the state come down on you.  I’m so sick of this sensitivity nonsense which is being used as a means to neuter us and muzzle us.  I can tell you what is at the heart of all of these attacks on free speech, it is a way to silence criticism of the state.  First they start with small things, like some guy hurting a kid’s feelings, or some guy hurting someone else’s feelings and linking the hurt feelings to a suicide.  Then they work their way up to criticism of state policies, politicians, and particular ideologies.  You can kill a frog by boiling it to death slowly.  That is what they are doing with us.

All the liberals who go along with this and encourage this sort of heavy handed statism are useful idiots.  The most important freedom we have is the freedom of speech, and bound up in that is freedom of religion, debate, and knowledge.  Learn to be less sensitive, you will have more peace in life that way.  The useful idiot of today is the slave of tomorrow.

Nice to see Obama using another tragedy to push his left wing anti-American agenda.  I have a better solution: Let all the teachers bring guns to work, and let them wear the guns in class if they want, just like the wild wild west.  That’s the American way, not surrendering more freedom to an already bloated and overly invasive government.

He’s talking about how he has to “change” America.  It really burns my rubber.  Disgusting subversive Kenyan Muslim village idiot.  Let’s change it back.  All this change is in the wrong direction, all aimed at neutering us.  Worthless man hasn’t had to work a day in his life.

I hate everything this man stands for.  I don’t buy into any of his tears and weaping.  That man is the most disgusting political opportunist ever.  He is so fake, and it should be obvious.  Also, since when is it considered a good thing for any leader to weap and cry like a little girl?  I don’t want to see a grown man crying, it does not make him more relatable to me on any level.  It just makes him look like either a sissy or a faker, and neither one is any good.  If a man can’t control himself he certainly can’t be expected to control anything else.

But I still think it’s all fake.  I’m only harping on it because I don’t know what kind of people all that crying and weaping bullcrap appeals to. 

Anyways this is serious, again we see another attack on our freedom from this man.  It is absolutely disgusting that he would use a tragedy like this to advance a political agenda, especially one which is antithetical to our values and freedom. 

“You just want there to be more shooters,” some leftist might say.  No way, but what everyone needs to understand is that if more people are armed there will be LESS incidences of shooting.  I know this is hard for the average leftist to understand, but let’s say that everyone is armed and some moron decides he wants to kill a few people.  He is going to get off far fewer shots before he is blown to pieces than he would shooting at a bunch of unarmed victims.  Giving away more freedom to big daddy government means 1) you are less capable of defending yourself, which means that the criminals can get away with more and 2) when martial law comes then there can be no popular uprising against it.  I said WHEN not IF.  And THAT is what all that gun control campaigning is really about.

So there was another random shooting, this time in Oregon.  There are two possibilities here 1) the amount of random shooting is on the rise, or 2) the coverage of such shootings is on the increase in order to promote gun control.

I tend to believe that both factors are at play here.  Regarding gun control, I believe what we need is more guns and not less.  If we had a more traditional culture, closer to the original state of the US and colonial America, then many people would be carrying guns with them at all times.  Under such circumstances some guy that wants to randomly mow down a lot of people would perhaps get off one shot, maybe two, and then he would be shot himself by a bystander, perhaps riddled with bullets.  That is the answer, not more gun control.  What made America strong is the old practices and culture that used to be here, not all the socialism and statism which have been added in over time, mostly in the late 20th century.  Since the addition of those items we have seen more failure and decline than ever before.

Now regarding the frequency of the shootings, I can definitely believe that they are on the rise.  The culture and values have changed, so the majority of people no longer place objective value on human life or personal freedom.  But the fact that this fellow killed himself in the end is very telling, and to me it indicates that suicide was his end goal, and the lashing out/mass murder was a stop on the way to that goal.

My grandparents lived through the depression.  My grandmother told me that during the Great Depression it was very common for men to kill themselves.  There were many who shot themselves, and others who simply jumped off the tops of tall buildings.  Why?

You have to understand male psychology, which the mainstream media, politicians, academia, and mainstream psychological profession is CONTINUALLY trying to deny and repress.  Men are validated by their accomplishments and self sufficiency.  Those are the things that men primarily draw their self esteem from, while for women horizontal relationships play much more of a role.  Men don’t care as much about being loved or well liked, or having lots of people to talk to and hang out with as they do about being able to survive on their own, and to provide, and to accumulate at least a little bit of wealth.  While there is some validation that can come from horizontal relationships, they are not at the core of it.  A man can have thousands of friends, and he can be in a relationship with the nicest and most attractive woman in the world, but if he can’t get a job or work then he is still going to feel 100% worthless.  Even under those circumstances a man might still consider killing himself, or at the very least long for death.

The worst thing for a man is to feel useless and/or helpless.  A man doesn’t want to live off of someone else like some kind of child or invalid, he wants to work and be free.  Living off of handouts is psychologically and emotionally crippling for a man.

“Oh but there are so many men on welfare, and they like it, and we need to help them…”  Yes there are so many men living off of welfare, and no they are not happy.  Look at how much criminal activity they engage in, and check their self esteem level.  A lot of men have been trained to accept dependence on some level, but it doesn’t follow that they are happy, they just don’t think they can do anything to help themselves anymore, and they have a high level of contempt for life.  If you want to help them then 1) Stop trying to make men into women, and 2) Stop trying to destroy the economy.  We need more jobs not more handouts.

Why is the male unemployment rate higher than the female unemployment rate?  That’s backwards and unacceptable.  I think that as the economy continues to deteriorate we will see more shootings, and more male suicide. 

I don’t understand or condone the shootings, but my guess is that the shootings are a result of undirected anger stemming from a lack of opportunity.  My guess.  I don’t think the majority of these shootings are Columbine type incidents resulting from people getting picked on too much or any such rot.  In any case, personal hardship does not justify mass murder. There are plenty of ways to take yourself out without bringing others with you.

As for the suicide, I can definitely understand that.  When a man is convinced that he has no future and that all of his best efforts are worthless then the only thing he really has to look forward to is death.  I have also suffered as a result of the economic decline.  We no longer have an environment of abundant opportunities, where if you work hard enough you can rise to the apex of your abilities and become successful.  Things have changed.  A lot of people will work hard and remain undermployed for their entire lives, just barely getting by rather than succeeding.  This is the new economy that the left has worked hard to create. 

More men will kill themselves, and many will do so in spite of the fact that they have wives and children.  I’m not trying to be unnecessarily grim, but people need to wake up and realize what is going on and why it is happening, rather than listening to the mainstream/leftist propaganda which wants you to think that up is down and down is up. 

I went through school twice, and the end result was that I worked a variety of odd jobs well below the level of my education before I found one that would allow me to GET BY.  That being said, I never killed myself, and I don’t reccomend suicide, but that is mainly because of my religious beliefs.  I always assumed that if I killed myself I would end up in Hell.  Every now and again if I burn myself or get sick for some time I think about Hell.  As awful as that pain is I can’t help thinking how much worse it would be if it were all over my body, and if there were never going to be an end to it.  That is something that should be avoided at all costs.  Even if I wasn’t sure about Hell, I would still hesitate with suicide because death is generally irreversable, and once dead, if you don’t like your destination then there is nothing you can do to reverse your situation.  So I figured I would just take it and see what I could do, and in the meantime avoid being a parasite on anyone else because parasitism is immoral, unless you are a child too young to take care of yourself.

But not everyone shares my belief in Hell or respect for human life. The culture, values, and beliefs of the majority of the US have changed drastically. But, instead of more government oversight, Big Brother, gun control, and psychological warfare on men, what I would like to see is a realistic approach to the issues. Enough trying to make men into women. Enough pretending that being a man or a woman is a lifestyle choice while sexual orientation is not. Enough with the culture of handouts and dependency. Enough is enough already.

Men need jobs, not handouts.

North Korea has a nuke, and Iran has a nuke.  I wonder who is going to try to nuke us first?  NK is now working on long range capabilities.  Why?  Does anyone care to venture a guess?  Is anyone stupid enough to not know why?  Is anyone stupid enough to think that the number one target is anything other than the US?

But of course, no one is going to nuke us right?  We are all one big happy family right?  After all, Obama is working to reduce our nuclear stockpile, so it’s only a matter of time before everyone else turns in their nukes for flowers, and comes to bask in the warm light of Obama.  Deep down inside no one really wants to hurt us right?  All we have to do is talk nice to them, and love them, and give them lots of hugs, and sit down and watch Barney and Friends while drinking green tea on borrowed money from China right? 

Why would North Korea want to develop a long range nuke in the post-Obama world?  It’s a world where everyone is nice (except for those mean racist conservatives), and no one wants to hurt each other because Obama says not too.  Big daddy Obama will make everything safe and good.

And even if BDO is wrong, then there is still a bright side to this (a very bright one).  Anyone who is struggling to lose weight doesn’t have to worry about anthing else.  It will all melt right off, along with our eyes, skin, muscle tissue, and everything else, and your brittle charred skull is falling to the ground where it will shatter into a thousand pieces.  If you’re in the epicenter it’s even quicker, just POOF and then your’re gone.  That’s right, one second you’re doing your thing, and in the next second you’re in whatever afterlife you were headed for, and there you are before you even knew what hit you.

If we get nuked I’m blaming all you Obama-zombies, assuming I survive.

http://news.yahoo.com/n-korea-launches-long-range-missile-015602333–abc-news-topstories.html

Today I am terribly sick, more sick than I have been in the last 12 or so years, even factoring in the sickness I got when I was in India.  I will not go into all the particulars of my present affliction, but I will say that I have done something a few minutes ago that I have not done in the last 10 or 12 years, I threw up as a result of being sick.  It was a most unpleasant experience, and not just because of the pain, but primarily because of the lack of control.  Once the process started, there was absolutely nothing I could go to stop it.  It happened again and again.  It is a terrifying thing to lose control over one’s body.  When this happened I felt more like a passenger in a body, just along for the ride, rather than a man with a physical body.

I really hope Assad wins the conflict in Syria and smashes all the rebels.  I am really disgusted with how Obama and other left wing governments are trying to manufactor a reason to invade that country.  This is beyond stupid.  First of all, Syria has jack all to do with us.  Second, I don’t believe that Syria will be better off without Assad.  The rebels are all Islamists, just like in Egypt, and Libya, and every other one of those wackjob countries in durka durka land. 

The rebels are not fighting for freedom, they are fighting for Islam.  They want to have an Islamofascist country where Christians get killed, and where women have to cover everything but their eyes and hands, and where they can’t work or drive.  The best sort of government any Middle Eastern country can hope for, aside from Israel, is a secular dictatorship.  The only people in those Muslim countries who want Democracy are the Christian minorities, but whenever the secular dictators get ousted then the Islamofascists come in and start killing the Christians.  I recently saw an article saying that women were being abused in Egypt.  I didn’t read the article, but of course women are being abused in Egypt.  Everyone with a functioning brain and any level of awareness knows what kind of people those people are, and should not be surprised by such things. 

Obama should have supported Mubarrak, or at least stayed out of the conflict there.  I don’t care how many idiots are getting run over by tanks while they protest for more Islam.  I don’t care whether or not Assad uses gas on those idiot rebels.  Now we have a savage medieval child molesting wife beating terrorist regime in charge of Egypt.  If Obama has his way the same will exist in Syria. 

Let Assad use gas on them.  The man has to do what the man has to do.  I’m sure that if the Islamofascists were in charge and there was a secular revolution then the Muslims would not hesitate to use gas and any other weapons at their disposal on them.  If the Islamofascists take over then things are going to be much worse for Christians and women in Syria, and much worse for Israel.  In fact, I think Obama might be trying to surround Israel with hyper-Islamic regimes on purpose.  It seems that the man loves his Islam.  The Iranian Green Revolution is the only major revolution in the Middle East that Obama did not support, and it also happens to have been the only secular revolution in that whole bloody region.  A free and/or secular Iran would be a valuable ally, and it would eliminate the threat of a nuclear Islamic Iran.  Now we have a nuclear Islamic Iran.  Obama didn’t do anything to help the Iranian people, he didn’t even mention one word about their revolution, but in the meantime he gives weapons to these animals in Syria.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama or one of those left wing governments from Europe decided drop some gas bombs in Syria and then blame it on Assad as a pretext for invasion. 

I really want Assad to win.  We don’t need to be sending any troops over there or bomb those people.  Let them be.  Also, all those liberals who have both anti-war bumper stickers and Obama bumper stickers on their cars need to take off either one or the other.  The man is at least as big of a warmonger on Bush, and he’s going to war on far more shakey grounds than Bush ever did.

This entry was inspired by a few different people I have seen online who self identified, sometimes in bragging ways, as being an Alpha male.  In some cases they may have been correct, but in most cases it strikes me as a hallow and meaningless boast.  Especially when the boast comes from either liberals or ghetto-ites.

First let us discuss exactly what an alpha male is.  In biology, and zoology, the term “alpha male” typically refers to the leader of the pack among pack animals, such as canids.  The alpha male is either the most powerful male in the pack, or is perceived by the others as being so.  The alpha male is free to have intercourse with any of the females in the pack, and if another male wants the same female he has to yield or fight about it.  The same is true if another male is chewing on a piece of meat and the alpha male decides he wants it.  If he chooses to fight about it then he runs a severe risk of getting ripped to shreds.  If he fights and wins then he becomes the new alpha male by default.  Alpha = power, and in the world of nature it is synonymous with the male who has the most power.

When dealing with humans the term alpha male carries a very similar meaning (men with the most power and influence), but with one key difference: Power is not directly related to physical strength in most cases. 

There are two components which are absolutely indespensable for being a human alpha male:

1) Having power

2) Using it effectively, which results in dominance

I believe that the majority of alpha males do not typically go around stating that they are alpha males, because they know what they have and what they can get, so any such statement would be gratuitous.  Typically the “men” who go around boasting about being an alpha male are actually beta men who want to be alphas.  When it comes to liberal men I don’t really need to state why they are not alpha men, so I am going to skip over them and talk specifically about the ghetto-ites, gang bangers, thugs, pimps, and general whoremongers. 

“Bangin lot’s a hoes” does not make one an alpha male, neither does beating on a woman.  Let us look at it this way.  Suppose that we divide up the supply of women into a heirarchy based on the primary factors that most men care about: physical attractiveness, youth, and physical fitness.  For the sake of argument let us also add in education, which is not necessarily a deal maker or breaker but it is something that many men also care about.

Here are some graphs to represent the supply of women (Warning: Before anyone fusses at me about “objectifying” women please keep in mind that women also apply ratings to men based on their own criteria.  If it’s not wrong for women to do it then it’s not wrong for men.  In any case, objectivity is necessary in order to understand reality):

So if one were to group women based on the quantity of the desired characteristics they have plus the abundance level (or quantity) at which they possess each characteristic, then you are going to end up with diminishing numbers as qualities and quantities go up. 

The very bottom rung would consist of women who are either undesireable or less desirable for a variety of reasons.  The bottom rung may includes women who are physically unattractive, women who have had sex with so many different partners that they are considered irreversably contaminated or low, women who have children outside of wedlock, women who are single but who have aged past their prime, etc. etc.  The gang bangers, hoodsters, pimps, whoremongers, etc., may have intercourse with a variety of women, may dominate and use those women, and they may even physically abuse them, but they always draw their women from the bottom rung, or at best the bottom two rungs. 

I had one of these sorts brag to me that he has banged more women than there are hairs on my head (which of course includes facial hair), and while that may be true, it is nothing to boast about.  It is like a man boasting that he is good at playing darts because he hits the wall each time.  Any beta male with low or no standards can easily copulate with women from the bottom rung, and he can do so without any strings attached.  But if those same thugs want to move up to the third rung it is going to be extremely difficult for them because the women in the 3rd rung will have higher expectations, and the odds are that the bottom feeding whoremonger does not know how to effectively socialize with women from that level.  Also, women from that level have more options when it comes to choosing mates, so money, career, and intelligence are going to be used as filters on any male candidates that approach them.  If they want to move up to the 4th level (green) then they will not stand a chance, because women also sort men based on their own heirarchy.

The average beta male probably has access to the bottom three levels of the pyramid.  If he plays his cards right maybe he can move up but that is extremely difficult.  A true alpha male has access to every level of the pyramid.  The alpha male can pair with women from the bottom rung, but the thugs and gangbangers who typically run with those women do not have access to any women on the top rung.

When I think of alpha men I think of the sorts of men who live in my parents neighborhood, which is an upper middle class to upper class neighborhood.  I can bench press more than most of them, I can also run further and faster than many of them.  BUT, in terms of real power what I have is just a small fraction of what they have.  “Well I can beat up most of those guys,” the thug might say.  Yes, maybe you can, and then you can go to jail and get sodomized until you have to wear a diaper to keep your fudge from falling out.  At that point you are not an alpha by any standard, in fact you aren’t even a beta, you’re just a bottom.  The fact is that intelligence + marketability = wealth, and wealth = power. 

The man with more funds at his disposal has the ability to make more things happen, and to buy greater security for himself.  He can also offer a woman more security, as well as a much more lavish lifestyle.  IF you have any sort of conflict with such a man and it goes to court then he is going to have the better lawyer.  The end result of all this is that the alpha male gets what he wants.  If he decides he wants a boat he gets a boat.  If he wants to live in a different neighborhood he gets up and moves.  If he wants lots of space around him he gets an estate.  If he wants to live in a crowded place like NYC and STILL have lots of space around him then he gets that.  If he wants a woman with any particular set of characteristics he gets her.  He is not limited by looks and physical strength in the same way that the beta male is.

One day I was driving into my parents neighborhood and I saw a bunch of families out.  The men had different physiques, ages, hair colors, amounts  of hair, etc., but the women were all fairly uniform.  All of the women were blond, all of them were thin or athletic, and they were all about the same height.  They also all had good facial structures, although I personally did not care for the way their skin looked as they were all tanned and had apparently been doing so for some time.  When I saw this I could not help wondering that if, over time, and assuming that the government does not interfere too much, the upper class people will begin to have a uniform look.  But upon further reflection I concluded that this was not the case.  The fact is those men represent an older generation, I would say they were mostly in their 40′s and 50′s, and many of the white males belonging to generations older than myself have a preference for tanned blondes, while the younger generations of men have their own preferences.  That being said, the fact is that those sorts of women were in short supply when those men were looking for wives, and they still are, but because of their wealth and power they were able to overcome the supply issues (which beta men typically cannot) and get what they want. 

That is what it means to be an alpha man.  A punk with something to prove is not an alpha man.

In case anyone is interested, no I do not consider myself to be an alpha male (I do consider myself to be a lone wolf).  I did finally manage to get the sort of woman I wanted but I had to go to great lengths and personal risk to do so.  I also had to look overseas to population pools where different sets of factors were at play.  I highly reccomend India.  I have heard good things about China, but I would stay away from the Phillippines.

I don’t understand why so many people are getting all bent out of shape over the Mayan Calender ending.  It disturbs me that so many people are superstitious these days.  I have always considered superstition to be the religion of fools.  So many people are scared stupid, or stupidly scared, over this that the government has released a blog to try to make these idiots calm down.  

I have a question for ALL Obamanites, and I have yet to receive a straight answer on this, or any kind of answer.  I have asked quite a few of you guys this question, and either my inbox on both Yahoo and Xanga is malfunctioning or this question is an automatic conversation stopper.  But I want to put it to you all right now and in plain sight.

The question is, how do you feel about tax money being sent to sponsor Islam and the spread of Islam?  As you know, or should know, Obama is giving money to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  He is also giving money to Pakistan, and Hamas.  Yes Hamas.  The money these people receive will help fund the building of mosques, Islamic education and indoctrination in public schools for both Muslims and non-Muslims, and the killing of Christians and Jews.  I know that most of you guys probably don’t pay taxes, but for the sake of argument (and for those who do), how do you feel about this?  Do you think it is fair for Obama to demand tax hikes when this is how he spends our money?  Every time I ask these questions I get no answers from you guys.  I can almost hear the crickets.

The thing is, I have a sneaking suspicion that the gross majority of you guys are OK with this, and that even if you don’t entirely agree with it you consider it to be a small blip rather than a real serious and deadly problem.  I have a theory that if Obama were somehow able to run for a third term 99.999% of you who came out for him the second time would come out for him again.

I know there are a lot of die hard atheists and Godless liberals on the left who supposedly get enraged over public endorsement and funding of any “religion.”  I know you guys get all bent up over things like the ten commandments being in courthouses, “In God we Trust” beng on money, and you claim to be adamantly opposed to your tax money going to fund any kind of theocracy.  Well here’s the thing, your money is going to fund a theocracy.  You worked hard to get God out of the public education in the US, and any time there is talk about putting disclaimers about evolution in public schools then you cry theocracy again (even though it’s not).  But now you have your tax money going to support a religion, teaching of a religion in public schools, and you are directly funding theocratic systems which hate you just as much as they hate us.  All of those countries are theocracies, every last one.  Make no mistake on that.  Oh yes, the Muslims hate all non-believers, whether they be atheists or Christians.  There is no separation of “church and state” (or Mosque and state if you will) in the Middle East and North Africa The life expectency of an overt atheist in the Middle East is at least as short as that of an open Christian.  Obama is using your money to sponsor theocracies that hate us.  Where is your indignation? 

This is why I think that all you self proclaimed anti-religious leftists and Godless liberals don’t really hate all religions, just Christianity.  Because I have not seen one ounce of outcry over this.  Instead I still see all kinds of talk about how you want to raise taxes on “the rich,” which BTW is not a fixed category (more on that later).

But I do want a serious answer from you guys.  If this has caused you to break with Obama, or even the DNC as a whole then I want to know so I can shake your hand.  If this has not caused you to break with Obama then I want to hear your reason/excuse.  Explain to me how you are not a hypocrite in that case.