May 20, 2008

• Global Warming

  It seems that articles about “Global Warming” are appearing with increased frequency.  It is as though they are desperately attempting to generate panic.  Why?  Especially considering that global warming is a hoax.  The following excerpt comes from Australian News www.theaustralian.news.com.

  Excerpt:

  Climate facts to warm to

  jserve.write(“/SITE=TAUS/AREA=NEWS.OPINION/AAMSZ=110X40/”); ipt>
  

  • Font Size: Decrease Increase
  • Print Page: Print

  Christopher Pearson | March 22, 2008

  CATASTROPHIC predictions of global warming usually conjure with the notion of a tipping point, a point of no return.

  Last Monday – on ABC Radio National, of all places – there was a tipping point of a different kind in the debate on climate change. It was a remarkable interview involving the co-host of Counterpoint, Michael Duffy and Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs. Anyone in public life who takes a position on the greenhouse gas hypothesis will ignore it at their peril.

  Duffy asked Marohasy: “Is the Earth stillwarming?”

  She replied: “No, actually, there has been cooling, if you take 1998 as your point of reference. If you take 2002 as your point of reference, then temperatures have plateaued. This is certainly not what you’d expect if carbon dioxide is driving temperature because carbon dioxide levels have been increasing but temperatures have actually been coming down over the last 10 years.”

  Duffy: “Is this a matter of any controversy?”

  Marohasy: “Actually, no. The head of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has actually acknowledged it. He talks about the apparent plateau in temperatures so far this century. So he recognises that in this century, over the past eight years, temperatures have plateaued … This is not what you’d expect, as I said, because if carbon dioxide is driving temperature then you’d expect that, given carbon dioxide levels have been continuing to increase, temperatures should be going up … So (it’s) very unexpected, not something that’s being discussed. It should be being discussed, though, because it’s very significant.”

  Duffy: “It’s not only that it’s not discussed. We never hear it, do we? Whenever there’s any sort of weather event that can be linked into the global warming orthodoxy, it’s put on the front page. But a fact like that, which is that global warming stopped a decade ago, is virtually never reported, which is extraordinary.”

  Source:  http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html

  The fact of the matter is that natural mechanisms seem to be in place which keep the climate stable, and for the most part compensate for the increase in CO2 emissions.  The climate is actually getting cooler rather than warmer.  A truth which I have suspected for years but which seems to have been confirmed by this article.  If the earth was actually warming, we would experience an increase in precipitation as there would be an increase in evaporation leading to an increase in ambient moisture.  The polar icecaps would actually grow under such circumstances, although even if they are growing it does not automatically follow that the earth is getting warmer.  According to the article the earth did go through an interval of warming, but it stopped about 10 years ago.  So I restate my question, why all the scare?

  I came across this article today: http://green.yahoo.com/news/afp/20080519/sc_afp/japanenvironmentclimate.html
  Everyone who knows me well or at least reads my page will know that I have problems with the herd mentality, but when something which is a patent lie is continually pushed forwards as truth with increasing emphasis it can be somewhat irritating.  It’s as though it is continually trumped up to compensate for waning belief or to prevent waning belief, sort of like evolutionism.  Of course, I found that more often than not evolutionists typically also subscribe to GW (global warming), but I believe that believers in the GW paradigm might be a bit more extensive than only evolutionary believers as the belief in GW encompasses other groups as well.  GW has been so continually emphasized as being a fact that now it is considered to be one by most people, and like evolutionism, there are few people who examine the basis behind the belief and the opposing view is not given equal treatment. 

  As to the question of why, the answer is simple if one merely looks at the “solutions” for GW and those who will be responsible for enforcing and instituting said “solutions.”  It is governments who enforce and propose solutions, and it is the UN.  The purpose behind it is to increase the control of governments over the people, and the control of the UN over governments.  To create a higher level of world organization in which people will have less freedom.  Population control and the belief that there are too many people in the world also factors into this.  Liberals often believe that there are too many people in the world and that we ought to cut back the population so that the environment can prosper more.  Are there really too many people for the environment to sustain?  No of course not, but it is a fact that the more people there are the harder it is to keep track of everyone.  It may be that in order for a one world government to maintain absolute control and hegemony, it might be necessary to reduce the population, or at least helpful.  Hence the scare tactics and emphasis on population reduction for the sake of the environment.  It is an effort to get people to voluntarily reduce their numbers, however, in the meantime the government poisons the environment as well as the population with sprays and vaccines. 

  • 12:51 pm
  • 16 Comments