April 18, 2013
-
Boston Bombing Suspects
So I keep hearing that there are officially suspects in the Boston attack, but I have yet to see any pictures. I can only assume that the attackers were not white, because if they were then the news articles would certainly have mentioned that and posted pictures of them. The fact that they have not mentioned the race of the suspects or posted pictures indicates that the identity of the suspects contradicts the left wing narrative.
When can we get some honest and responsible reporting? What will it take? How much more of this bullcrap do we have to take?
Let me see their ugly mugs!
Why is it the left hates the white male so much? I have a theory but I don’t have a concrete answer. My theory is that since the modern left was founded on “Critical Theory” they must attack western civilization, and the majority of people responsible for western civilization were white men.
If I could one wish come true, and it couldn’t be wishing for additional wishes or an infinite supply of wishes, then I would wish for all the people who hate western civilization to be free of it. And by that I mean, I would wish to have them deported to place like Venezuela, North Korea, Mexico, and the Islamic world. Maybe Obama could go and be the president of Egypt. That would be some sweet justice and irony, and of course, all tickets will be one way.
All the manjinas can go too.
Comments (26)
This incident is making a monkey out of the Obama Regime.
To add insult to injury Obama cut 40% out of the budget that funds prevention of bombings like Boston Marathon.
@ImNotUglyIJustNeedLove - That’s right, he is a blithering clown. This has not been a good week for the left, with the bombers turning out not to be white, and the gun control being rejected by the Senate. The next thing that will brighten my day is if the amnesty crap gets shot down. I will go out and celebrate.
Lets just say if it turns out these two terrorists are of your ilk….they deserve every ounce of hate given their way.
@tendollar4ways - So if pro-American patriots start acting like Muslims, it will make you happy because ______________________
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - As I said before…Muslims are very very conservative…they are your brothers in arms. It is of no coincidence the two suspected parties in this are either conservative muslims or conservative americans.
@tendollar4ways - Not that I’m trying to be impolite, but that’s completely asinine. That’s like saying that a traditional Maoist, who opposes the new efforts the Chinese government is making to experiment with free or less restricted trade in certain designated areas of China is one of my people because they are “conservative” for China. The ideology is entirely different and in fact antithetical. If anything you have more in common with them than us because both of you want to have a controlling and invasive government running everything.
The fact that you would even make such a comparison just shows that you know little or nothing about their ideology, and little to nothing about ours as well.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Your ideology is inconsistent, full of empty platitudes and wakked out logic. I can easily see some nut getting worked up by Limbaugh and the boys to act in such a way. We have seen it before and we will see it again.
@tendollar4ways - If it’s full of such things then you should be able to list some specific examples. By all means, do go ahead and list them.
Just because you want something to be true, doesn’t mean that it is, and doesn’t mean that it will be.
You do realize that they guy who shot Gabriel Giffords was a leftist right? Also that former cop who went on a killing spree.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - The Giffords guy was a nutjob and the Dorner guy was a crazy leftist. Both sides have crazies but lets face it…you guys want the crazies to have full unempeeded access to weaponry and issurection is the matra du jour comming from the right.
As for your examples…simply go through you blog posts and I refute you all the time.
But since you ask…and off the top of my head….Gay marrige, tort reform, voter rights are just a few of your complete and utter contradictions.
@tendollar4ways - I want to have full unimpeded access so that I can blow the crazies brains out when they come for me. I don’t trust the government’s motives in regulation. Let me have my own stuff, and I’ll deal with whatever risks that entails. Anyone who would give up freedom for security will end up with neither, and certainly does not deserve to have either.
You refute me all the time? Wow.
No, no, no. Don’t quote sound bites. Give me specific examples. How is my position on “gay marriage” inconsistent or based on faulty logic. Be specific.
Now what are you talking about by “tort reform” and “voter rights”?
I want to have full unimpeded access so that I can blow the crazies brains out when they come for me.
If the bombers turn out to be homegrown, Limbaugh trained, I am sure they will say something along these lines…with the crazies being the government.
I am speaking about rights. Freedom you say outta one side of your mouth as outta the other you want to deny people the right to vote, get married to who they want or have any recourse if damaged in a transaction.
Ya is a contradiction….or full of shit. Take your pick.
@tendollar4ways - ”If the bombers turn out to be homegrown, Limbaugh trained”–That’s every left wing/statist progandists wet dream, because it can be used to garner public support for a police state which you THINK you can use to eliminate people you don’t like. Unfortunately once the police state is in place it goes both ways. Conservatives are the guardians of freedom. Without us there would be no US, not Constitution, no rule of law, no freedom of speech, etc. If we are angry and protesting it is because freedoms are being impenged. If you guys are angry and protesting it’s usually because you want something you didn’t earn.
It’s healthy when government fears the citizens, it’s not healthy when citizens fear the governmnet. Government is SUPPOSED to be answerable to the citizens, at least in rule of law type societies. In despotisms it’s the other way around.
It’s looking like the bombers are durka durkas.
Alright back the truck up. First of all, rights don’t come from me they come from God. I am not in a position to grant or retract rights. If rights come from me then you have no grounds for complaining about anything, because I can’t violate rights that I didn’t give you in the first place. Now, that being said, who am I denying the PRIVILEGE of voting? I want to hear it. Second, where did I ever say that people should not be able to marry whoever they want? Don’t blow any steam, produce an actual quote from me with a link to the location where I made that comment. If you want to accuse me of anything you need to back it up.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Right Wingers blowing up people at a marathon is why we have freedom? The ACLU is evil?
And you wonder why people think you guys are nuts.
@tendollar4ways - They aren’t “right wingers” they are Muslims, and your calling them anything else does not change the fact of what they are.
So you have opted to shirk the challenge of backing up your assertions. That’s fine, but if you don’t have the stomach for debates then you shouldn’t put your foot in it.
The Islamic world would stone Obama within weeks. They only like him if he’s using Americans’ lips to kiss their asses.
@blonde_apocalypse - They love how he uses drone to blow up the Pakis.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Islam , Christianity….same stuff. You went into a diatribe above about God giving rights and this and that and really it is pretty much the same as the silliness your Muslim Brothers spew. I guess thanks for tanslating “allahu akbar” into english?
From the pics I have seen….looks like neither and more like a Kleybold and Harris part Duex.
@tendollar4ways – What?! Your tin god blows up children? No. That can’t be. I heard him on the tv just yesterday saying the most important thing in the world to him was protecting children. Surely he wouldn’t be telling bald faced lies on tv.
@blonde_apocalypse - Eh…Muslim Children. They ain’t people right so…really poor argument.
@tendollar4ways - Now you’re just being ridiculous. If it’s all the same try living in an Islamic country and talking like that, see how long you last.
OK, if I’m giving rights then you should just shut your mouth because you have no right to complain about anything. You know why? Because I didn’t give you the right to complain.
No, they are durka durka Muhammad jihadis: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/16/17784776-fbi-releases-video-of-two-dangerous-suspects-in-boston-bombing?lite%3e1=43001
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Yes Yes Yes….you are finally getting it. If you had the chance, YOU would go all Uganda on the Blasphemers and I would be stoned in the streets.
You are just mad America isn’t a Christian version of Oman.
Thank God for us lefties.
Islamic conservatives or American Conservatives…..religious fanatics either way.
@tendollar4ways - Where did I say that I wanted the kind of system that exists in Islamic countries? Quote me. I should have thought it was obvious that I was pointing out how much safer it is to live in a majority Christian society vs. an Islamic society. I don’t understand why you continuously evade challenges and fail to understand the obvious. If your intent is to get an emotional reaction out of me it is not going to work. Also, provide some scriptural basis for killing anyone for blasphemy.
You also failed to understand my statement about rights. Do rights come from God or do they come from me? If they come from me then what grounds do you have for complaining about rights violations of any kind? I can’t violate something you don’t have. Also, who am I attempting to deny the privilege of voting, and where did I say that people should not be able to marry whoever they want? I am waiting for you to back up your accusations with some substance.
The reason Islamic countries are so strict is because their religion mandates that they organize society in that particular way. I am continually critical of their societies and methodology, so how you equate my sharp criticism with envy is beyond me. I don’t know if you are trying to be a troll, or of you are really incapable of taking what I say at face value/recognizing the obvious.
More like thank Satan for the left. You have done nothing but undermine our economy, culture, and whittle away at the state of freedom. You are a statist fanatic, meaning you have a fanatical level of adoration for government and the state. I don’t see a lot of difference between you and they. You both are advocates of big government and a police state, both are willing to use force to silence verbal opposition, and both place no objective value on human life. Statists are statists. They worship allah, while you worship politicians (which is even more base).
@tendollar4ways - How about you start by adressing my points and end by staying on topic? If you stay on topic you will save lots of time all throughout.
What I want is to have my ability to defend myelf unimpeded. More people being armed is another way to deal with crazies, and much better than cracking down on law abiding citizens. I don’t trust the government to determine who is crazy and who is not. According to the government potential terrorists are people who vote 3rd parties, people who died their hair recently, people who have pro-life stickers on their car, etc. I have more faith in me, and in the legal system set up by the founders, than I do in them. That should be simple enough to understand.
Who am I trying to deprive of voting?
Where did I say that I was against people being able to marry whoever I want?
What legal protections am I trying to deprive people of?
Be very specific, and quotes with links to locations where I said something to back up your accusations will do nicely to help you prove your point.
The pot calls the kettle black. All you have is your emotions and feelings, and my freedom does not end where your feelings begin.
Have a party, but you might want to let the drugs dissipate out of your system before dealing with any government agency.
Are you not against gay marriage? Did republican’s not try and stop black people from voting via “voter id laws” ? Tort reform = you cannot sue.
As I said…just off the top of my head.
Oh…BTW….looks like you were right about the bombers. Gotta give you your due!
@tendollar4ways - Ah yes, “Gay marriage.” I stated very clearly that as a concept “gay marriage” is an oxymoron. I have also stated that I don’t care how they want to think of themselves, or what ceremonies they want to hold. The only thing I have a problem with is government forcing private individuals to treat them as though they are “married,” when in fact they are no more married than a man and his dog, or a man and his car. I don’t really care what anyone does with themselves, but they should get no special legal recognition for it, and regardless of what the law says I’m not recognizing it. I believe I was completely clear on that in my entry on the topic.
First of all, I’m not a Republican. Second, the voter ID laws had jack all to do with black people voting, and to suggest that they did is thoroughly ridiculous. The purpose was to stop illegal aliens from being able to vote, and all of the states with mandatory voter checks were able to stop them, but those without ended up having illegals voting. You just don’t like the law because you want illegals to be able to vote.
Don’t know enough about tort reform to have a position on it one way or another, and to be honest it’s not on my list of priorities. Other things are far more pertinent, like NDAA, gun control, fiscal responsibility, stopping amnesty, and drones being deployed over the US. We are heading for dark times, and I get the distinct impression that you will be cheering for them.
@tendollar4ways - Thank you. That is most civil.