Month: March 2013

  • Patriotism = Hate, According to the Left

    For some time the left has been working to connect patriotism with hate, racism, and terrorism.  We are headed towards a police state with no freedom, and the government has taken an adversarial position against the citizens.  We can see it both in their attacks on the 2nd ammendment, and the way they are stockpiling guns, ammunition, and now tanks. 

    The left has come out and officially stated that they are afraid of patriotic law abiding American citizens.  What we are seeing now is a smear campaign in order to garner some public support for the impending police state.  People are most amenable to police states when they feel threatened.

    I am posting the entire article below, and my comments will be interspersed.

    Source: http://news.yahoo.com/extreme-anti-government-u-groups-record-high-could-164159284.html

    Extreme anti-government U.S. groups at record high, could grow: report

    –The first mistake here is the title.  “Extreme” is a relative term depending on your perspective, and anything can be classified as extreme in a subjective sense.

    WINSTON-SALEM, North Carolina (Reuters) – The number of extreme anti-government groups in the United States grew to an all-time high in 2012, and a backlash against federal gun control measures could fuel more growth in the movement, the Southern Poverty Law Center said on Tuesday.

    –The second mistake is quoting from the “Southern Poverty Law Center” as if they were some kind of legitimate source.  Those people are nothing but a left wing propaganda machine, and anything but an objective unbiased research center or source of information.  Also, if people are anti-government then there is a reason for it.  If the government continues to act ridiculous and set itself against the people then more people are going to be anti-goverment.

    Active militia and so-called Patriot groups totaled 1,360 last year, a massive jump from the 149 recorded in 2008 in an annual count of extremist groups by the Alabama-based civil rights organization.

    –Again, what objective basis is there for calling these people extremists?  The formation of militias is entirely Constitutional, and stems from the 2nd ammendment.  There is no basis for calling these people extremists.  Patriots are the guardians of freedom in this country, if the government is doing it’s job then they should not be at odds with any patriotic person.  It is when they are doing things they should not do then we have a problem.  I also do not see the point in qualifying “patriot” organizations with “so-called” unless one is trying to condemn anyone who self identifies as patriotic.  Just because the SPLC calls people extremists does not make it so.  Reality is objective. 

    The number of organizations the center terms hate groups, or those that attack minority groups, dropped slightly to 1,007 in 2012 from a record high of 1,018 in 2011.

    –These so-called statistics are worthless as the means of classification are entirely subjective.  What makes someone a hate group?  That they hate someone?  Can you prove they hate someone?  If so then you had better classify the Black Panthers, New Black Panthers, and SPLC as hate groups.

    Active hate groups identified by the center are scattered throughout the country and include the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, white nationalists and racist skinheads.

    –Mentioning the KKK and Neo-Nazis in the same article with patriots does not put them on the same level or establish an association, although I know that is what the author is TRYING to do.  The KKK and Neo-Nazis are hate groups, it’s true.  Skinheads are Neo-Nazis, so mentioning them separately serves no logical purpose, and calling them racist is gratuitous because there are no non-racist skin heads.  The author and the two editors clearly do not know what they are talking about, and are attempting to make it look like there are more white racist groups then there actually are. 

    Nationalism is not racist nor is it predicated on hate.  Nationalism is simply the belief that every people group has the right to self rule, and part of that involves having a country in which they are the majority.  Nationalism has everything to do with self preservation and a respect for human dignity, and jack all to do with racism.  Calling someone a “white nationalist” is about as coherent as calling someone a white Democrat.  Nationalism is anti-Imperialist.  The left is good at condemning imperialism when it WAS perpetrated by white people, but does not have a problem with imperialism when other groups are involved. 

    So I can’t help but get the impression that the author is trying to throw out terms to look informed, and to make the WS movement look larger than it is, but the fact is she is grossly ignorant.  Also, if we are going to go after racist groups why is there no mention of La Raza?  Seriously. Because Obama met with them?  Well, that doesn’t make them non-racist. 

    Some organizations, such as Christian groups, strongly object to their categorization by the center as “hate groups” and say the civil rights organization is itself stirring up hatred.

    –Because it is.

    In a letter on Tuesday, the center’s president urged Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to shore up federal resources devoted to countering the threat of domestic hate and extremist groups.

    –Oh yes, because a police state is the answer.  Once we have a police state then everything is going to be all rainbows and unicorns.  This is a perfect example of how the left is motivated by hate and fear.  They want the government to beat on people that they hate, without understanding, and they don’t stop to think about how the type of system they are advocating might affect them.  Once the police state is established the SPLC people will be just as jacked if they stay out past curfew as Captain America.

    “As in the period before the Oklahoma City bombing, we now also are seeing ominous threats from those who believe that the government is poised to take their guns,” said president J. Richard Cohen on behalf of the law center.

    The Patriot movement last reached a peak in 1996, a year after right-wing extremist Timothy McVeigh set off a truck bomb outside the Oklahoma City federal building, killing 168 people. McVeigh and a co-conspirator were convicted. McVeigh was executed.

    –What is “The Patriot movement,” and why is she capitalizing “Patriot” but not “movement”?  Not only do we have yellow journalism, but also bad writing in general.  Claiming that patriotism and terrorism are linked does not make it so, but we have to expect this coming from the same people who are continually comparing the Founding Fathers to Islamic terrorists.  The fact is the real patriot movement peaked in the 1700′s, and resulted in the English despots being thrown out in favor of a more just adminstrative system. 

    Since both the author and her source are being subjective, there is no way of pinning down exactly what she means, but there are lots of people who will read this article and all they will take from it is; patriotism = bad, and police state = good.

    As long as the government is doing it’s job the there is no reason for the government to be at odds with patriots.  Patriots are the people who love their country.  If he government is doing anything other than what they should, then they are criminals and should be treated as such. 

    Homeland Security spokeswoman Nicole Stickel said on Tuesday the department has been working with law enforcement “to better mitigate and respond to violent extremism, regardless of the ideological beliefs that may motivate it, including violence perpetuated by violent sovereign citizens and anti-government militia groups.”

    –So basically they are manufactoring an excuse to institute a fascist/communist police state.  They have been laying the ground work for some time now.  They are bringing in the drones, and un-Constitutional legislation that allows the targetting and killing of American citizens if they are deemed to be a threat by the state. 

    The number of such groups, whose adherents view the federal government as their enemy, dwindled in the late 1990s and early 2000s only to rise sharply in the past four years.

    –Because the Federal Government views us as the enemy and has treated us accordingly.  The economic policies have bankrupted this country and saddled us with debt.  As the economy languishes Obama and friends decide to give away more money to countries and people groups who hate us.  Obama should have been arrested and dragged to jail in handcuffs for giving money to Hamas, and the Muslim Brotherhood.  That is absolutely criminal.  But aside from the economy, they also attack our freedom.  They stockpile guns, ammunition, and now tanks, while trying to manufactor excuses to disarm us.  They flood our country with unwanted 3rd world immigration and make us pay for those people.  They already view us as the enemy, and if they want to change our perception of them then they need to change their actions toward us.  Patriotic people only have a quarrel with anti-American policies.  Stop those policies and there will be no problem.

    A sluggish U.S. economy combined with the election and re-election of Democrat Barack Obama as the country’s first black president have stoked anger and fear in some Americans and helped drive the growth of extremist groups, said Mark Potok, senior fellow at the center and editor of the report.

    –No, no, his being PART black has nothing to do with it.  The left continually brings that up as if it were some sort of trump card that somehow delegitimises attacks on his policies.  But it’s nothing more than shameless disgusting hypocrisy.  The left, and the liberal media, was at the forefront of the attacks on Herman Cain.  Unlike Barack Osama, Herman Cain was a real black man, and an American.  Obama is a half-breed Kenyan Muslim, whose only black American ancestry comes ironiclly from his mother.  I’m sick to death of hearing the left try to tie in rational policy objections with racism.  Just stop. 

    Any government which is at odds with the people needs to either change what they are doing to step down.  The fact that growing numbers of people are overtly upset with Obama and the Dems should tell them something.  I don’t know why they thought rigging the election would ever lead to popular support.  Maybe they didn’t and they are fine with people hating them because one way or another they intend to establish a police state with a command economy.

    GUN CONTROL EFFORTS COULD SPARK NEW GROWTH

    Potok said the national conversation about gun control since the December shooting deaths of 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school could cause the number of anti-government groups to swell again.

    –I am not convinced that the government didn’t have a hand in Sandy Hook.  But what they can do to reverse some of this anger is back off on the gun control.  If you don’t like where it is leading then back off. 

    Congress is considering bills that would ban assault weapons, expand background checks for prospective gun buyers, crack down on illegal gun trafficking and improve school security.

    –If they were serious about protecting the schools then they would put armed guards in the schools or require the staff to carry weapons. 

    A number of states are contemplating laws aimed at nullifying any federal gun control measures.

    “We are seeing this huge reaction to the potential of gun control,” Potok said. “And that reaction is so angry that it is hard not to be afraid of what is coming down the road.”

    –So then rather than bother us, get on the government and tell them to stop doing what they are doing, this isn’t rocket science here.  We are also scared of what these criminals in the government have planned for this country.  They have stockpiled coffins, ammunition, and tanks for domestic use.  They have staffed and activated the FEMA camps, and they are preparing to deploy drones. 

    Potok said membership totals for U.S. hate and anti-government groups were difficult to ascertain. He estimated there are between 200,000 to 300,000 people involved in hate groups and 300,000 to 400,000 in militia groups.

    –Being opposed to the government and loving your country is hate according to these people, and saying that it is does not make is so.

    Among hate groups identified by the center is the Family Research Council, a conservative Christian lobbying group, due to its anti-gay stances. The group strongly rejects its categorization as a hate group and says “reckless rhetoric” from the Southern Poverty Law Center spurred a shooting at its Washington headquarters last summer. The center denies the charge.

    “They are the ones who are fomenting hatred against us which has resulted in violence against us,” said Peter Sprigg, senior fellow for policy studies at the Family Research Council. “To label us a hate group is clearly a slander.”

    –Yes it is, but slander is what the left does.  All of their arguments are predicate on emotion and fear of freedom.  But that’s OK, the more they cry “hate” and “racist” the less meaning those terms have.

    The number of hate groups may also increase in response to immigration reform measures that reinforce their members’ fears about the country’s changing demographics, including the projected loss of the white majority, the law center said in its report.

    –It is amazing how much capacity the left has for criticizing the people who critisize policies rather than looking into the policies themselves.  They recognize tat they policies are contraversial, but are incapable of thinking about what that is. 

    Again, the government needs to stop what it’s doing.  Nobody wants to be replaced by a different people group, and we don’t want to see our country dragged down to the level of Mexico or the Middle East.  Where are we supposed to go if our country gets wrecked?  Obozo killed the space program so we can’t go to Mars any time soon.  The only purpose of the “immigration reform” is to fix things so that Democrats will be able to win every election hands down.  They want to flood the country with Democrat voters.  Marginalizing the people in favor of foreigners is a terribly unjust way of going about to get votes.  This is why people are anti-government, because the government is anti-us. 

    (Reporting by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Andrew Hay)

    –This article makes a mockery of journalism.

  • Hugo Chavez & Cold Freeze

    Well, Obama’s friend is dead now.  I would extend my condolences to Obama except that would be insincere.  In fact, on the surface this looks like a good thing for Venezuela, to finally be rid of that prick.  The only problem is that it is highly likely whoever takes his place will be just as bad, if not worse.  Those people down there can’t be very smart to have elected a despot like Hugo Chavez in the first place, and my theory is that most of them are not smart enough to realize that the damage he caused to the country was caused by his policies.  Much like the Obamanites in the US. 

    In other news we are having severe cold and snowstorms:

    http://weather.yahoo.com/deadly-snowstorm-slams-road-air-travel-midwest-001801446.html

    Here we have global warming at it’s finest, making things get colder.  This is part of the reason why I can never take “global warming” seriously.  If we have some unusually hot weather it’s “global warming,” but then if it is getting colder they also attribute that to global warming.  So basically, it’s getting colder because it’s getting warmer.  Right.  Because that is entirely rational.  The global warming alarmists are definitely working to establish an unfalsifiable tautology. 

  • Gun Control Mentality

    I want to take a moment to discuss the mentality that exists among gun control advocates, and why it is flawed. 

    The only people hurt by gun control are law abiding citizens.  Murder, rape, theft, and assault are already illegal.  People who want to do those things will do them with or without guns, and if they want guns bad enough they will still get them from the black market.  My point is that they are already breaking the law, so putting more laws in place isn’t going to stop them, but what it will do is make it harder for non-criminals to defend themselves.  Punishing law abiding citizens for the actions of criminals makes about as much sense as collectively punishing a class. 

    Here is an analogy for gun control:

    Back when I was in high school I had some teachers that would let us watch movies in class.  It was either for the purpose of giving us a form of celebration, or illustrating the concepts we were learning about.  Under those circumstances most students would cooperate, but there were always one or two pricks who would goof off and make noise.  Sometimes the teacher would terminate the movie on behalf of those pricks, and instead give a written assignment for the whole class.  Why do that?  The just thing to do would be to punish only those pricks.  Send them out of class if they refuse to cooperate.  But no, everyone had to be punished.  As a method of prevention such action is both unjust and lazy, not to mention inadequate.  It was worth noting that the bad behavior of those individuals often continued following the new assignment/punishment.

    The whole gun control argument is predicated entirely on emotion, and what it boils down to is leftists saying “I don’t trust you with guns,” or “how do I know you won’t go crazy if you own a gun?”  The guns do not make people go crazy, they are inanimate objects.  I could say that it doesn’t matter to me whether or not what I have or don’t have makes you uneasy, and I could say that it doesn’t matter objectively what you think, but instead I would like to emphasize that those same concerns are AT LEAST equally valid regarding government.  Why is it OK for the government to possess implements of destruction when law abiding citizens cannot?  What special factor is it that makes the government inherently superior and exempt from the sort of insanity that allegedly afflicts citizens when they are armed?  I would like to hear someone attempt to answer that in a logical way, the key word being attempt.  The fact is, governments kill.  Not only do governments kill foreign nationals, but they also kill their own citizens, and governments kill on a much larger scale than do the worst most reprehensible individuals in any given society.  Also, it is a good deal more difficult to hold governments accountable for murder than it is individuals. 

    The fact is, gun control arguments are predicated upon the concept of the ubermensch.  The belief that government, by nature, is somehow more responsible and trustworthy than the citizenry is inseperable from the concept that there is an intellectually and morally superior breed of man, and that this superior man composes the governing body.  There is no way around it.  One cannot argue against citizenry owning weapons based on alleged moral and intellectual aptitude or ineptitude, without applying those same arguments to government.  Having more faith in the government than in fellow citizens puts the government on a pedistal.  If one is concerned about human behavior then that concern applies to all humans, unless one believes that there are quality gradations within humanity based on class.  I know this is getting redundant, but if you trust government more than you trust citizens, then it is because you believe that they have superior intellect and/or virtue over the average man.  You believe in the concept of the ubermensch.

      iron-sky

    While I do believe that there is variation when it comes to intellect and virtue, those are variations which exist primarily between individuals rather than groups.  The concept of the ubermensch is dangerous because it creates a climate where it is difficult or impossible to hold the government accountable.  People accept actions and decisions based upon the presumed merit of the governing body rather than upon the actual merit of those actions or decision.  People are also more likely to change their views based on what the government and their chronies say rather than what facts and logic would dictate.  People are also more likely to accept natural rights violations because the government supposedly determines morality.  Basically, people now accept a multitude of things uncritically that they might otherwise stop and think about, or flat out reject.

    Red Skull

    Objective and moral assessment go out the window, because they are no longer needed as far as the citizens are concerned.  The moral majority (if there was one) is replaced by a servile majority, which is critical of those few who still think critically rather than the government, and this only serves to make the tyranny stronger.  If you don’t like something he says then the problem lies with you according to the logic, and you might need to be done away with for the greater good.

    Hitler

    The ubermensch mentality was what allowed the Nazis to get away with doing the things they did.  People accepted the Nazi ideology based more on the presumed merit of those who perpetuated it rather than it’s actual merits, and those who criticized it were reported by their neighbors.  Most people didn’t complain when the Jews were rounded up, and those who did were forcefully silenced. 

    It is worth noting that the Nazis took up all the guns from law abiding citizens.  They took away all the guns before they took away all the Jews.  If people still had their guns then at the very least the Nazis would have bled a little when they started rounding people up, even if most of the people were brainwashed into being unsympathetic toward them.

    The fact is, gun control is really about people control.  Governments want gun control for the same reason they want the citizens to see them as superior.  They want to be able to do whatever they want without being challenged on any level.  It is evident that most people in government consider themselves to be a superior breed of man, and they want us to believe it too, but I’m not buying it. 

    I want to make something very clear, anyone can be the Jews next time.  A lot of people don’t seem to care when the government goes after the other guy, or the other group, but if they go after him they can go after you, especially in the sort of cultural climate where people either don’t care or just accept it when the government goes after anyone for any reason.

    The second ammendment wasn’t created strictly for home defense, although that is included, it was created to safeguard our freedom in case the government ever got out of control.  When I see liberals saying things like “F*** the 2nd ammendment” and “the Constitution is outdated” I am gravely concerned.  It just goes to show how divorced the left is from the founding principles of our nation.  Our country was not founded based on being mean to Native Americans or women.  Niether did the founding fathers have anything in common with Al Qaida or Hamas.

    Our country was founded based on freedom, and the idea that there are inalienable natural rights which exist independent of human agency.  When those rights are violated by a government then the government loses it’s legitimacy.  We don’t just accept whatever the government does because it’s the government or because we hate group X.