March 14, 2013

• Dirty Traiterous Abomination Dianne Feinstein

  I would say I am disappointed, but since the Democraps have the majority I can’t be disappointed or surprised, because there was never any reason to expect anything good or pro-America ou of them.  All the useful idiots who voted for the Dems bear some culpability in this.  How much more freedom do we have to lose before people start to realize how important freedom is?

  The assault weapons ban, which was sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., passed on a strictly party-line vote – 10-8 – and faced fierce opposition from Republicans on the committee, at one point turning personal when Sen. Ted Cruz, R- Texas, questioned Feinstein about the constitutionality of her bill.

  “The question that I would pose to the senior senator from California is would she deem it consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment?” Cruz asked.

  Good question, let’s see what the skank has to say.

  I’m not a sixth grader,” Feinstein said in response. “Senator, I’ve been on this committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years. I walked in, I saw people shot. I’ve looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons. I’ve seen the bullets that implode. In Sandy Hook, youngsters were dismembered.”

  –Oh, what do you know, she has nothing to say.  Emotionally laden pathos based appeals are fine for Koolaid drinkers in Candyland, but in real life that is not an answer to his question.  She didn’t address a single of his points with a counterpoint.  He asked a legal question, and she started talking about something completely unrelated.  Also, bullets don’t implode, they are solid pieces of metal.  The skank doesn’t even know what she is talking about.  Maybe she is TRYING to talk about exit wounds (also not an implosion, stupid skank)?  But if we are scared about grisly exit wounds, and grisly exit wounds are a thing to be avoided, then why is DHS buying up hollow point rounds?  Answer me that skank.

  “I’m not a lawyer, but after 20 years I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution. I have great respect for it. This doesn’t mean that weapons of war and the Heller decision clearly points out three exceptions, two of which are pertinent here,” she said. “It’s fine you want to lecture me on the Constitution. I appreciate it. Just know I’ve been here for a long time. I’ve passed on a number of bills. I’ve studied the Constitution myself. I am reasonably well educated, and I thank you for the lecture.”

  “Congress is in the business of making law. The Supreme Court interprets the law,” she said.

  –The rest of this is an appeal to authority, her own.  What it amounts to is “I know what I’m talking about because I say so.  Don’t argue with me.”  This is the heart and soul of the political left.  No logic, and no rule of law, just raw emotion and control.

  First of all, it doesn’t matter if the liberals or anyone else says we don’t “need” assualt weapons.  The Constitution is not predicated on opinion, especially not the opinion of statists.  I would say that they don’t know what the main purpose of the second ammendment is (being able to overthrow a tyrannical government), except that they probably do.  They want to be even worse than they have been so far, and remove our means of resistence, just like Hitler disarmed the citizens of Germany, Jewish and otherwise, before he started doing his more diabolical crazy crap. 

  But I digress, let me play devil’s advocate and pretend for a moment that the subjective “need” based argument has some basis in reality.  If that is the case then why does DHS need so much ammunition, and why do they “need” to have fully automatic assault weapons?  If we don’t need them why do they?  We both live and work in the same geographic location.  DHS is for operating in the homeland. Why do they need weapons designed for mowing down large groups of people?  They aren’t going to be fighting Islamic terrorists domestically.  If it’s safe for us then why isn’t it safe for them? 

  It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain what these treasonous pricks are doing.  We have a government that is in violation of the law.  End of story.

  Source: http://news.yahoo.com/assault-weapons-ban-passes-senate-committee-170008477–abc-news-politics.html

  • 2:35 pm
  • 20 Comments