So I recently wrote an entry asking for feedback on immigration (specifically the issue of amnesty for illegals) from liberals, and I tagged a few.  Some of the responses I actually agreed with, but there were some that were exactly what I expected:

1) Appeals to emotion/sympathy, which not only failed to engage my sympathy but were also irrelevant given that we were dealing with matters of legality and economics.

2) Faulty analogies, such as repeatedly trying to present urelated items as being parallel or equal. 

I’m not going to say who exactly those individuals were, because I find it distasteful and disrespectful to write entries about fellow users.  But I am going to address the issues because, unfortunately, those views are disturbingly pervasive.

That being said, let’s get down to it.

There is a reason why we have borders.  National borders are not unnatural lines that were arbitrarily drawn by mean or racist people, in general.  In SOME cases there are borders which were questionable, such as some of the different countries in the ME and Africa.  Straight lines on a map could be indicative of an arbitrary decision, or they could be indicative of a compromise or agreement between two or more different factions.  But putting that aside, the reason we have borders because the people living on either side of the border belong to differnent people groups.  Sometimes it might be a racial divison (as is the case with China and India), or it could be a cultural, religious, or linguistic difference.  It could even be all of the above.

There is a squiggly line that runs between China and North Korea.  The reason that line exists is because on one side there are Korean people, and on the other side there are Chinese people.  The Chinese want to be ruled by Chinese people, and the Koreans want to be ruled by Korean people.  Since both China and NK are communist hellholes, they could have opted for one government due to politcal similarities, but they didn’t.  Why?  Because there are cultural differences between the two of them.  I think that should be simple enough for anyone to understand.

The reason why we have different countries for different people groups is so that those people groups can engage in self rule, which is a human right.  Different people groups have the right to determine their own culture and make their own laws, which includes determining who they let in, and how many they let in.  If country X decides to let in citizens from country Y, then that is their prerogative.  If country X does not wish to let in citizens of country Y, but the Y people come anyways, then that is an invasion.

Now, back to the situation of illegal immigrants coming into the US.  The fact that they broke the law by entering does not justify their presence here.  The fact that some businesses want to hire them to buck minimm wage does not justify their presence here.  The fact that they have been living here for some time does not justify their presence here.  The fact that they had children here does not justify their presence here.  The fact that lots of them want to come and stay here does not justify their presence here.  The fact that the country from which they fled is a hellhole does not justify their presence here.  Why?  Because none of that has any bearing on whether they are legally entitled to be here, or any bearing on whether or not their presence here is good for our economy and culture.

As I have stated many times, giving these people citizenship or allowing them to stay incentivises that behavior, which means more illegals.  It is also unfair to all of the lawful immigrants and potential immigrant going through the proper legal channels.  It’s like a guy at a grocery store checkout line cutting in front of everyone and being checked out in spite of the fact that some people have been waiting fo 20 minutes.  No he doesn’t get to be checked out first, he needs to move his sorry behind to the back of the line. It’s too bloody bad if he’s in a hurry or whatever, he should have planned better, and he doesn’t have the right to supercede the rights of others just because his circumstances might be less than ideal.  No sympathy for law breakers, or those who demand special treatment for bad behavior.

It does not matter what a craphole Mexico, or whatever other backwards 3rd world dump, the alien comes from.  None of that gives them a right to be in our country against our consent.  Just because you want something, or what someone else has is better than what you have, does not make you entitled to a piece of their pie.  OK Bill Gates has a lot, and I hardly have anything, so he should let me move in with him and give me 3 cars and a theater sized flat screen TV because I don’t have those things.  My life is so rough compared with his, so he is obligated to make my life better right?  Wrong.  No one is obligated to give someone else their stuff.  Economic disparities exist largely because of intellectual and ethical disparities. 

Government cannot act as charity, because government does not generate wealth, or glean wealth from donations.  No, printing money does not generate wealth.  Everything the government has is gained through appropriation by force.  Don’t believe me?  Don’t pay your taxes an see what happens.  Just send the IRS a note saying that you don’t feel like giving them any more money so you aren’t going too.  My point is that one cannot be charitable with someone else’s belongings.  IF government has to exist, then they need to stick to the bare minimum when it comes to their range of powers, activities, and expenditures, and the should not be wantonly giving away money in exchange for votes, or nothing.  Neither should they be giving their kids lavish vacations at tax payer expense.

Yes I know it is hard for people to come here legally, and yes I know there are lots of Mexicans and other 3rd worlders who want to come, but that does not give them the right to come, nor does it mean that it is good for us to have them here.  In fact, there are some very good reasons why it is difficult for 3rd worlders to come here legally. 

Most of the 3rd worlders coming here are unskilled/uneducated workers.  Now I have seen Mexicans (probably illegal and anchor babies), saying that they have a RIGHT to be here and that they work.  Some insist quite vehemntly that they have a right to be here on those grounds.  Many insist that they are Native Americans and that they are taking back their land, but let’s examine the validity of those claims.

Whether or not Americans are lazy is irrelevant.  If we were so lazy, as a people, then why is our country so much better than theirs?  Some Americans are lazy, and others are kept from working because employers choose to hire illegals so they can avoid minimum wage requirements.  The fact is, we don’t need a Mexican or 3rd world work force, because we already have a large domestic workforce which already has a difficult time finding work.  If we cut welfare then those who are lazy will be forced to work the low paying jobs anyways, and if we penalize those who hire illegals and deport he illegals when they are found then more jobs will open up for Americans.  So to say that we need them is utter bollox.  The only thing we need from them is for them to scamper back across the border and take their children with them.

“Oh that’s racist!”

No, it’s pragmatic.  Pragmatism is not racist, it’s cold and logical.  PC sensitivity ignores reality and logic, and unjustly attempts to stigmatize rational thought.  Facts are not racist or bigoted, they are axiomatic, and ignoring them are calling them derisive terms does not change the reality of their existence.

Bringing in a flood of unskilled workers during an economic downturn does not do anything to help the economy recover, especially if the people you bring in have a propensity to drain the systm.

Also, the claim that the majority of them are hard workers is not borne out by reality.  57% of them are on welfare: http://www.examiner.com/article/fifty-seven-percent-of-mexican-immigrants-on-welfare

As for the Mexicans being Native Americans, yes it is true that they are mostly the natives of Central America, but that’s Central America, and they already have their own country there, which does not automatically grant them a right to be here no matte what La Raza says.

Now when it comes from immigration from any part of the world, what we need is quality control.  We don’t need any unskilled or uneducated workers.  We have more than enough domestically.  If we don’t want our culture, standard of living, and way of life destroyed, then we need to limit who comes in.  Most of the people in 3rd world countries, and this goes for any 3rd world country, are not very smart.  Don’t believe me?  Do a quick search on yahoo or google for “world IQ map.”  The reason why 3rd world countries are such a mess is because the people who live there made them that way.  No you don’t get to blame white people and Jews for that, the people who run those countries bear the blame.  The people who elect and worship despotic leaders bear the blame.  Poor judgment and ignorance are rampant, but it is poor judgment that exacerbates and perpetuates the ignorance.  Now whether the lack of intelligence and good judgment is due to cultural or genetic factors is a different issue, but the fact is that it exists. 

I’m not saying that everyone from the 3rd world is stupid and that there is just nothing that can be done about it, in fact there are many smart people in the 3rd world which we would benefit from having in our country.  But there is no benefit in bringing in droves of ignorant village people. 

Look at Mexico.  Before any white people went there Central America was run by despotic empires who engaged in human sacrifice and forced labor.  When the Spanish came the Mexicans had no idea what they were, but they just sided with them because they were sick to death of human sacrifice and slavery.  Unfortunately the just ended up exchanging one set of despots for another, although the Spanish were relatively benign compared with the Aztecs.  They were still saves after a fashion, but at least they didn’t have to worry about getting their hearts ripped out.  Now, after a time they got fed up with the Spanish and drove them out, and what did they do after that?  They picked more despots who continued to abuse them and run the country into the ground.  Now, this tells me that the majority of Mexicans lack the judgment to determine good leadership.  This fact is also borne out by the overwhelming support they give to Obama.  Picking a despot, thanks a lot.

I would say that only about 30% of Mexicans are intellectually qualified to be here, and none of those are illegals.

But let’s talk about another culture, because this issue is larger than Mexico (even though they make up the gross majority of illegals).  I am bringing my wife in from India, but that does not mean I want to take everyone from the state of Chattisgarh and drop it right down on top of Georgia.  If that happens then all the messed up things that are happening in Chattisgarh will happen in Georgia. You can expect the streets to be as crowded as the Atlanta Aquarium, you can expect chaotic traffic, animals crapping in the streets, adds spraypainted on the side of your house, and you better get a concrete fence around your house to prevent theft.  Also, you can kiss any pride parades goodbye.  If you try pulling off a pride parade anywhere in India then your life expectency is going to drop to whatever age you are at the moment. 

Let me make it simple, the quality of a country is a direct result of the people who compose it.  If hordes of 3rd world villagers pour into the US (which is what most 3rd worlders are), then those conditions will be reproduced here.  The more their numbers grow, the more the US will become like the country they came from.  Don’t believe me?  Are the neighborhoods the live in once they come here nice?  Are they safe?  Who is involved in most of the crime there?  If they couldn’t build a good country in their homeland then what is the basis for assuming they will do so here?

So quality control is essential.  It is OK to have immigration from the 3rd world, but only of intelligent people, and only as much as our economy can handle. 

We may need foreign doctors, engineers, and computer experts to come here because very few Americans are entering into those fields.  Most people want to get liberal arts degrees which are becoming progressively more useless.  Maybe it’s because our culture is decaying, like the Romans, or our gene pool may be decaying, but either way bringing in qualified intelligent people to work those jobs will compensate for that a little and help bolster are civilizaton.  Bringing in hordes of ignorant village people will accelerate the decline of our civilization.  They will only bring their village mentality and culture with them, and they will demand that we adapt to them rather than the reverse.  One need only look at what happened to the Romans as they let all kinds of Germanic barbarians enter.  They ended up losing everything, and the same can happen to us. 

Feeling sorry for people because their country is a crapheap is a poor reason to let them in, unless perhaps they are a persecuted religious or ethnic minority (like Coptic Egyptians).  Their country is a crap heap because they made it that way, and letting them in will not ameliorate any of the poor conditions in the country from which they fled.  Also, the numbers in the 3rd world country will rapidly replenish, so there will be even more people that want in next time.  If you liberals feel so bad for the people in 3rd world countries, then get up and go there to help them, but do it with your own money, not tax payer money.  Christians, which most of you guys hate, have been doing this for a long time. 

That’s all I have to say on this topic, but check out the videos below for additional thoughts on the issue:

I want the liberals to convince me why I should support amnesty for illegal aliens.  Build a case, I know you probably cannot, but I want to see you try anyways.  I have seen the politicians try to produce a variety of blundering arguments, ranging from thinking they can get more votes to wanting to be nice to people.  None of which are valid arguments.  So let me hear it from you loyal Democrat voters.

This has to be one of the most loathsome things this vile man has ever done.  So… it’s good to pardon illegal aliens, who are criminals that contribute nothing and in fact drain the system, but we need to get rid of those bad legal immigrants who do evil things like buy property with their own money and work for a living. 

Why is Obeyme getting personally involved in this case?  Is it because they are Christian and white and having lots of kids?  I know things like that really stick in the left’s craw, but I think it’s actually broader than that.  Most likely the main reason for this is because they want to go after home schoolers. The inappropriately named “Justice Department” says that no one has a right to homeschool.  Really?  No one has a right to homeschool?  Who died and made you asshats God?  Because last time I checked your grotty opinions had no bearing on human rights. 

The fact is it’s none of your business how people choose to raise their kids, and it shouldn’t matter to anyone else how someone elects to raise their kids as long as they are not raising them to be depending on the state.  I would consider taking kids away from  crack whore but not from responsible parents. 

I can’t stand it when government thinks they have a prerogative or a right to raise someone’s kids.  Muslim countries are the same way, but for Islam.  But let me just give a breakdown on what the REAL reason is for why the left hates homeschooling:

The left wing leaders (government and media) want to have all the kids in public school because public school is the statist indoctrination machine, that teaches people to worship government without thinking.  They want to have a bunch of mindless koolaid drinking zombies who will base their concept of right and wrong on what the government says, and who will report (communist/nazi style) on their neighbors and family.

The left wing followers hate homeschooling because they hate traditional values and Christianity, and they want to make sure that those things do not get passed on.  They are scared of their patriotic freedom loving neighbors, and would rather have them turned into Koolaid drinking zombies like they are.

I plan on homeschooling my kids.  Of course both my wife and I are going to have to work, so I will probably get my mom to do it.  But I don’t want my kids going to the state idoctrination centers when they are young and impressionable.  I don’t see any value in that.  I dare anyone to argue this with me.  I plan on homeschooling at least up until 6th grade, and if I can afford it I will put them in private Christian schools. 

I don’t understand why more Christian and conservative parents aren’t concerned about the public schools.  Their kids are spending 6 hours a day getting taught a different set of values and beliefs, and then when they start smoking pot or meth, or they contract an STD, or get in trouble with the police the parents act all surprised.  “Well I didn’t raise them that way!”  Of course not, you barely raised them at all.  You let the communist propaganda machine raise them.  How anyone thinks that one hour of Sunday school a week can make up for five days of brainwashing is beyond me.

It’s about freaking time the liberal media started paying attention to the plight of the Coptic community in Egypt.  Who are the Copts?  The Copts are what is left of classical Egyptian civilization.  They are the ethnic Egyptians, who do not self identify as “Arabs,” and they are also Christians.  The Coptic church is at least as old as the Catholic Church, but has it’s own heirarchy based in Egypt.  Up until recently they still spoke a language which was descended from classical Egyptian, but now that language is only used in liturgies.

The Coptic community has had to put up with so much crap from the Muslims.  For a long time they were not allowed to build or repair churches and if they want to then they have to get permission from the government.  They aren’t allowed to ring church bells (but the Muslims can shout for their prayers).  Muslim men are allowed to marry Coptic women, but not the reverse.  Christians are allowed, and pressured, to convert to Islam, but if they want to convert back they are killed or threatened with death.  Muslim men often kidnap Coptic women and force them into marriage in order to accelerate their cultural assimilation. 

But here is the latest outrage:

Let’s call it what it is, making an exception for a certain group of law breakers.  I don’t understand why anyone can seriously consider this a matter for debate.  Here is why giving citizenship to 11 million illegal aliens is bad:

1. It sets a bad precedent for rewarding certain types of law breakers, which means we will get more of that behavior in the future.

2. PART of the reason those people are here is so SOME businesses can get away with paying workers less than minimum wage.  If these people become citizens then those businesses will lose their menial workers, and they will just bring in or facilitate the bringing in of another crop of illegal/off the books workers in order to save money. 

3. It’s unfair to legal immigrants.  I have to wait almost a year to bring my fiance to the US.  Actually, correction, I have to wait almost a year for USCIS to VIEW our case, and I have to pay money for the legal process.  Why should these people get free citizenship just because they broke the law?  What about all the people who have been living in the US legally and working for citizenship for years?  What about PRODUCTIVE and educated immigrants who are employed in the US and want to bring their wives here but have to wait for years?  What a tremendous slap in the face to all these people.  This is unacceptable and unethical, send the illegals back.

4. Our economy can’t handle this new influx.  Our economy is already in the dumps.  Who is going to pay for all these people?  Oh yes, let’s tax the evil rich so these people can have welfare.  That will be so good for the economy.  Let’s just increase the size of the permanent underclass of takers, because that’s just great for everyone all around (sarcasm).

To me this is just beyond ridiculous.  I don’t see why our tax money should be spent to take care of another country’s citizens.  I don’t care what a crap heap their country is.  Their country is a crapheap because they made it a crapheap, and bringing them hear in large numbers until they become the majority is only going to make our country just like theirs.

If they have a problem with their country let them turn to their own leaders to fix it, instead of making demands and begging to us.  I’m trying to start a family.  I don’t want to have my tax money going to these people.  Seriously.

McCain blathers out foot in mouth comments about there not being enough trucks or busses to send them back.  Then when he gets shouted down he makes a foot in mouth comment about the US being a “Judaeo-Christian nation.”  So what?  That authorizes you to take our money and give it to freeloaders against our will?  Where does it say you should act that way in the Bible.  If you want talk about the Bible then sloth is condemned at least as much as giving is promoted, and BTW giving is only giving if it’s voluntary.  If you hold a gun to someone’s head and take their money then it’s theft, even if you then go and feed a large family of illegal’s with the contents of that persons wallet.  You’re still a theif, and the person who got robbed didn’t even have a chance to be generous. 

As for the busses, if there aren’t enough then let’s make some more.  Maybe we can stimulate the economy with bus manufactoring for some time.

I saw another article where Obama said that it would be good for the Republicans to get on board with him on giving citizenship to illegal aliens.  He said it would help them gain popularity among the “Hispanic” (which really means Mexican) voters.  Which, I can say will never happen for two reasons.  One is that Obama will still get the credit, even if the Republicans go along (which they shouldn’t).  Another problem is that the Republicans can never give away more handouts or money than the Democrats.  They cannot outgive the Democrats without completely alienating their voter base. So the best thing for them to do is block Obama’s immigration plan completely, and start sending those buggers back home.

Funny how the new Pope hasn’t even been on the job for a week yet, and he already has a better relationship with Israel than Barack Obeyme after five years of occupying the White House. 

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/israel-welcomes-pope-friend-jews-205216572.html;_ylt=Ah5NyAwzLG8B8B.TI7HhIm6ZCMZ_;_ylu=X3oDMTVxbzltOHJjBGNjb2RlA2dtcHRvcDEwMDBwb29sd2lraXVwcmVzdARtaXQDQXJ0aWNsZSBNaXhlZCBMaXN0IE5ld3MgZm9yIFlvdSB3aXRoIE1vcmUgTGluawRwa2cDNDEzNzQ3MGQtYjUwNS0zNmNjLThhMDItY2ZkMDBlZWI2ODFjBHBvcwMzBHNlYwNuZXdzX2Zvcl95b3UEdmVyAzUwNGM2YTMwLThjZTktMTFlMi1iZmZmLWM4MzQ3ODE2OWQxMg–;_ylg=X3oDMTMzdGVsMG80BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDYTk3NDM1Y2QtZGE2ZS0zZmRkLWExZWUtNDAzMWIzOTAyOTAxBHBzdGNhdANibG9nc3x0aGVsb29rb3V0BHB0A3N0b3J5cGFnZQ–;_ylv=3

I would say I am disappointed, but since the Democraps have the majority I can’t be disappointed or surprised, because there was never any reason to expect anything good or pro-America ou of them.  All the useful idiots who voted for the Dems bear some culpability in this.  How much more freedom do we have to lose before people start to realize how important freedom is?

The assault weapons ban, which was sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., passed on a strictly party-line vote – 10-8 – and faced fierce opposition from Republicans on the committee, at one point turning personal when Sen. Ted Cruz, R- Texas, questioned Feinstein about the constitutionality of her bill.

“The question that I would pose to the senior senator from California is would she deem it consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment?” Cruz asked.

Good question, let’s see what the skank has to say.

I’m not a sixth grader,” Feinstein said in response. “Senator, I’ve been on this committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years. I walked in, I saw people shot. I’ve looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons. I’ve seen the bullets that implode. In Sandy Hook, youngsters were dismembered.”

–Oh, what do you know, she has nothing to say.  Emotionally laden pathos based appeals are fine for Koolaid drinkers in Candyland, but in real life that is not an answer to his question.  She didn’t address a single of his points with a counterpoint.  He asked a legal question, and she started talking about something completely unrelated.  Also, bullets don’t implode, they are solid pieces of metal.  The skank doesn’t even know what she is talking about.  Maybe she is TRYING to talk about exit wounds (also not an implosion, stupid skank)?  But if we are scared about grisly exit wounds, and grisly exit wounds are a thing to be avoided, then why is DHS buying up hollow point rounds?  Answer me that skank.

“I’m not a lawyer, but after 20 years I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution. I have great respect for it. This doesn’t mean that weapons of war and the Heller decision clearly points out three exceptions, two of which are pertinent here,” she said. “It’s fine you want to lecture me on the Constitution. I appreciate it. Just know I’ve been here for a long time. I’ve passed on a number of bills. I’ve studied the Constitution myself. I am reasonably well educated, and I thank you for the lecture.”

“Congress is in the business of making law. The Supreme Court interprets the law,” she said.

–The rest of this is an appeal to authority, her own.  What it amounts to is “I know what I’m talking about because I say so.  Don’t argue with me.”  This is the heart and soul of the political left.  No logic, and no rule of law, just raw emotion and control.

First of all, it doesn’t matter if the liberals or anyone else says we don’t “need” assualt weapons.  The Constitution is not predicated on opinion, especially not the opinion of statists.  I would say that they don’t know what the main purpose of the second ammendment is (being able to overthrow a tyrannical government), except that they probably do.  They want to be even worse than they have been so far, and remove our means of resistence, just like Hitler disarmed the citizens of Germany, Jewish and otherwise, before he started doing his more diabolical crazy crap. 

But I digress, let me play devil’s advocate and pretend for a moment that the subjective “need” based argument has some basis in reality.  If that is the case then why does DHS need so much ammunition, and why do they “need” to have fully automatic assault weapons?  If we don’t need them why do they?  We both live and work in the same geographic location.  DHS is for operating in the homeland. Why do they need weapons designed for mowing down large groups of people?  They aren’t going to be fighting Islamic terrorists domestically.  If it’s safe for us then why isn’t it safe for them? 

It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain what these treasonous pricks are doing.  We have a government that is in violation of the law.  End of story.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/assault-weapons-ban-passes-senate-committee-170008477–abc-news-politics.html

Someone needs to cut that little fat man Kim Jong Un down to size.  It is really bothersome that our government is not taking him seriously.  It’s as though our government looks at what needs to be done, and then does the opposite.  Instead of preparing for war with the US citizens, they should be preparing for war with Kim Jong.  The main purpose of government is to deal with foreign threats.  If they refuse to do that then they are not doing their job.

“The North has threatened a nuclear strike on the United States, but such a threat has been dismissed as rhetoric by analysts, as the North does not have the military capacity to reach the United States.”

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/11/us-korea-north-idUSBRE92A01820130311?feedType=RSS

That’s great, just flippantly dismiss the threat.  I see Obama supporters doing the same as well, but here’s the thing, Kim Jong Un doesn’t need an ICBM delivery system in order to hit us.  All he has to do is move a submarine close to our coast and they can blast us, just like they blasted the Deep Horizon oil rig. 

Source: http://www.dailypaul.com/133339/us-orders-blackout-over-north-korean-torpedoing-of-gulf-of-mexico-oil-rig

Or, they can send someone into our country carrying nuclear device or a dirty bomb.  It wouldn’t be hard considering how lax our border security is with Mexico.

Let’s not forget what kind of people the Kim Jong’s are.  Look at what they have done to North Korea.  There are less lights on in North Korea at night than there are in the average African country.  How does one take a country full of Asians, especially north Asians, and run it into the ground to an African level of poverty and development?  There is no amount of inept bumbling that can do such a thing.  That sort of thing has to be done on purpose by sadistic statist individuals.  North Korea is sub-third world.  The ironic thing is that prior to the Korean split the north is where all the industrial development was.  The south was mostly just farms.

If the Kim Jong’s have that much contempt for their own country and people, then how much more must they despise the rest of humanity?  If they have no qualms about utterly destroying their own civilization, then they wouldn’t blink an eye at wrecking ours. 

The only thing that MIGHT hold little Jong Jong back is personal cowardice, meaning fear for his own personal safety, because he doesn’t care at all about how badly his own country gets trashed. It’s already trashed.  But so far the Kim Jong’s have been able to get away with whatever they want and have faced no reprisals, so I don’t see why Jong Un should feel scared.  The US didn’t do anything about the shelling of Yeonpyeong Island, or Deep Horizon, so the man is probably feeling fairly secure.  In any case I’m sure he has multiple bunkers.  Of course, to have a normal human fear reaction one has to be a normal human being, and I get the impression that Kim Jong Un is not operating on all cylinders, just like his father. 

I don’t think our government would care if North Korea nuked us, so long as the nuke didn’t land in Washington DC.  They would still be able to live their comfortable wealthy lifestyle, and they could just move to a part of the country where the radiation isn’t present.  These are people who love catastrophe’s and who have gone on record stating that catastrophe’s are good.  These are people who have gone on the record stating that they want to de-develop the US.  These are people who are trying to take away our guns while stockpiling their own guns and ammunition against us.  These are people who want to be able to target kill US citizens in the US without arrest or due process.  These are people who classify American Patriots as potential domestic terrorists. 

So by dismissing Jong Un with a handwaive our government is either grossly incompetent to an unprecedented level, or they are dangerosly malicious towards us.  Perhaps both. 

If any of you have not watched ay of Rand Paul’s Filibuster then I highly reccomend starting.  I just started mysef, and as of this posting have watched about 13 minutes.  I am deeply disappointed with the majority of Republicans for going along with Obama on the drone program, and with his attempts to establish martial law in general.  However, I am starting to warm up to Rand Paul.  He seems like he might be on the level.

I have a question for Barack Osama & friends, if he hasn’t killed anyone yet, and does not plan to (as he claims), then what does he need such laws and procedures for?  The “War on Terror” is a complete crock.  One cannot win an undeclared and undefined war.  The ultimate purpose of that “war” is to establish martial law domestically, and all of our soldiers that are getting killed and mutilated overseas are getting killed and mutilated for nothing.  Fighting for freedom for some other place while our own country become PROGRESSIVEly less and less free is no kind of victory.

I understand the need for going into Afghanistan (assuming that 9/11 was not an inside job), but Iraq, Libya, Syria, and all that other meddling was/is entirely pointless and counterproductive.  The best government that any North African or Middle Eastern country (aside from Israel) can hope for is a secular dictator like Sacha Baron Cohen’s character from “The Dictator.”  Admiral General Aladeen or whatever his name was.  Tampering with those backward countries only makes things worse.  Christians in Iraq and Egypt have it so much worse as a result of US meddling.  They are always the first people the Muslims will mess with when they get angry or overly bored.  Let them have their countries while we have ours.  We won’t go to their countries, and they don’t need to come to ours.  This isn’t rocket science.

But I digress.  Obama and the Dems want to be able to kill citizens at any point for any reason.  Maybe they will blow up a whole restaurant to get one guy (as Rand Paul suggested).  Maybe they will use drones to deal with political dissent and people who list rational objections to bad government policy.  I really hope this garbage anti-American legislation is overturned.

Anyways, watch the video:

It’s official, North Korea has come out and stated that they want to nuke the US, in fact they have promised that they will.  This is not something which can simply be blown off or dismissed.  They have stated their intentions, and are working on making it happen in spite of all the sanctions.  They don’t care.  If anyone thinks that chubby little dictator is going to care that his people starve a little more they are sorely mistaken.  The man wants nukes, and he wants to be able to nuke the US.  He already has the ability to hit Japan.  The man is a nutcase, and he doesn’t care about anyone but himself. 

What they want to do is nuke Washington DC, but given their low-tech capabilities it is likely that they will miss.  If they hit the US mainland they could hit Arizona, Missouri, Arkansas, etc.  They may not even hit a major population center, but they might, and in any case having a nuke go off anywhere in this country is going to be bad for the whole country.  We are talking about radioactive fallout spreading and poisoning food and water on a mass scale. 

Why has this small joke of a country been allowed to continue to exist, especially after making such threats?  Obama and crew are such clowns.  They don’t recognize who the real threats are.  They see the US citizens as enemies, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood as friends, and North Korea as irrelevant.   I wonder if they will still view it as irrelevant if a nuke falls on DC?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/furious-over-sanctions-nkorea-vows-nuke-us-092213643.html;_ylt=AkBydA0Aqt_NadHBucHdDXfNt.d_;_ylu=X3oDMTJsMzhsNmlnBG1pdANIQ01PTCBvbiBhcnRpY2xlIHJpZ2h0IHJhaWwEcGtnA2lkLTMxMDQyMTIEcG9zAzMEc2VjA01lZGlhQkNhcm91c2VsTWl4ZWRIQ00EdmVyAzY-;_ylg=X3oDMTM2MWRnYThtBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDNWIyZTQxNjgtZGE4NC0zZDYwLTg0NWYtMmM1NDk5N2NmOTUzBHBzdGNhdANwb2xpdGljc3x3aGl0ZWhvdXNlBHB0A3N0b3J5cGFnZQ–;_ylv=3