Month: February 2013

  • Acid Attacks Have Come to Europe

    A friend of mine shared this article with me.  This is a very serious issue, on multiple levels, which needs to be addressed.  I am going to post the entire article here, and follow it up with my commentary:

    Acid Attacks Arrive in West, Feminists Maintain Silence

    by W.F. Price on February 3, 2013

    Acid attacks are a particularly nasty form assault that targets primarily females. They are most common in South Asia and parts of SE Asia, and are carried out for reasons of jealousy and, in some cases, as punishment for “immodesty.”

    On December 30, a young Afro-English woman named Naomi Oni was assaulted by a woman in a niqab (AKA hijab, burkha) after working her shift at Victoria’s Secret in the Stratford Westfield mall. Prior to the attack, 20-year-old Ms. Oni had a pretty face, but that has been changed forever.

    It seems clear that there was a religious motive behind the attack, and it would be fair to call it an act of terrorism, yet we have heard surprisingly little about it in US news outlets, which typically trumpet anything of this sort to the entire nation as in the case of Bethany Storro of Vancouver, Washington, who splashed herself with acid in a plea for sympathy, and possibly to obtain free rhinoplasty.

    An acid attack on a pretty woman’s face is somewhat akin to cutting off an athelete’s legs or a surgeon’s fingers. An important asset has been rendered useless, and this will permanently destroy many of the advantages and opportunities she had prior to the attack. From a Western perspective, it’s an exceptionally evil thing to do.

    However, for some sects (not including all of Islam to be sure), the greater evil is the public display of beauty. Victoria’s Secret is therefore the kind of place – and its employees the kind of people – that would make a natural target for religious fanatics opposing Western mores concerning modesty.

    But still, we haven’t heard a single feminist make an issue of this. Not one slutwalker has stepped up to denounce the attack. Feminists have maintained an eery silence over this woman-on-woman attack.

    Why?

    Well, it doesn’t fit their narrative. If a man had carried out the attack, they’d be busy denouncing it very noisily. If it had been a white man who threw acid on Ms. Oni’s face, their response would be deafening. However, in this case it is a non-Western woman, and what good can come of publicizing that? What advantage can be gained? One cannot tax these women, as most do not work, nor can one use them to any other economic advantage. There is no real utility to the story — it is politically useless for feminists, because it falls entirely outside their narrative, which has patriarchal Western men exploiting everyone else.

    So, the question is, do feminists really care about acid attacks when they cannot be somehow used to extort Western men? Apparently not. What a morally bankrupt “movement.”

    Source: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/02/03/acid-attacks-arrive-in-west-feminists-maintain-silence/

    1353172672006 

    I agree with this article completely, and I am wondering how many more of these things have to happen before everyone wakes up and recognizes what Islam is?  Islam is not like other religions, it is not like other political ideologies, it is a brutal ideology of death and slavery, which was designed for the purpose of taking over the world. 

    As infuriating as this attack was, to me it is not in the least bit surprising.  Why?  Because back in their own countries these people do these sorts of things all the time.  In Afghanistan cutting off noses and ears is fairly common, as is throwing acid on a woman’s face.  Beating wives is run of the mill, as is forced marriage, and marrying minors to old men. 

    These people believe that women are inherently unclean and inferior, and need to be kept in place by as much force and brutality as possible.  They think that about 90 to 95 percent of the female body is unclean, hence the ridiculous costumes they wear.  Ugly, stupid, ridiculous costumes which are completely impractical for the sun blasted environments that many of them occupy. 

    Now, while I do believe that the majority of women in Mooslime countries who are beat and mutilated are innocent victims, there are also a lot of Mooslime women who buy into that garbage propaganda and help perpetuate it.  I’m sure the savage durka durka skank mentioned in the above article is one such creature.

    My guess is that the durka durka skank probably comes from Afghanistan or Porkistan, and she took umbrage to the “loose sexual morality” of jolly old England, or perhaps western culture in general.  She probably was offended by the existence of Victoria’s Secret, and if the black African woman was as good looking as the article said then there may have also been some female jealousy involved.  So in an insane Allah worshipping way it could make sense that she became the focal point of the durka durka skank’s hostility. 

    That being said, I have to say that there is nothing that excuses launching such a vile and savage attack against a complete stranger.  That is a really sick and twisted thing to do.  I don’t care how “offended” you get by the fact that someone else does not share your values, or belief in your false god and pedo “prophet.”  You don’t permanently disfigure someone’s face over a difference of opinion and belief.  I know that whatever Islamofascist slimepit you crawled out of allows for that sort of behavior, but in civilized countries that isn’t how we act.  It also doesn’t make your bullcrap religion look appealing or true.  It just makes you look like a savage piece of crap that needs to be killed for the good of humanity. 

    Let me break it down, because I know the Muslim intellect is a bit slow.  I see stuff that offends me all the time.  I see stuff that offends me politically, religiously, morally, etc.  If I pass a store in the mall that has offensive stuff that I can’t abide being around, you know what I do?  I DON’T GO IN THERE.  I also don’t watch most of the shows that are on TV these days because I don’t agree with the morality of them, or lack thereof.  It doesn’t take rocket science to figure it out.  If you think the “immorality” of the culture in your new country is too much for you, then pack up your burka and go back to whatever savage hellhole you crawled out of in the first place.  I guarantee you that none of us will miss you, not one bit. 

    I wonder what happened to that Muzzie skank?  I hope they killed her, but since it’s England and England is thoroughly sissified I doubt they will do much of anything.  What is the type of justice the Muslim skank should get?  At the very least her face should also be similarly disfigured.  But other factors need to be considered.  For example, if the victim was beautiful, and the muzzie skank was already an ugly looking piece of crap, then even if both faces are completely destroyed, one woman has lost a lot more than the other.  So the balance is still difficult to reach. 

    There is nothing that can be done to restore a person’s face.  Not until the science of cloning gets to be better than it is now.  Another thing that often happens during these acid attacks is that the victims are often blinded.  It could be argued that the victim is better off not seeing the hideous ruin that occupies the spot where her face used to be, but without being able to see how does one work?  How does one read?  How does one live and enjoy life?

    If someone attacked my wife, daughter, sister, etc., like that, I guarantee that justice would be swift.  I would deal with it immediately, and without giving it a good deal of thought, and then I would probably go to jail. Why? Because the legal system here is not equipped to deal with the type of savagery that the Islam world doles out.

    In fact, I think that the majority of white people are not prepared for dealing with the kind of brutality that the Muslim engages in.  To us it is shocking, and while some of us are capable of doing what needs to be done, the legal system is not.  Which brings me to my next point.

    Not everyone should be allowed into the US, or Europe for that matter, but since I am in the US then that is what I am going to focus on.  Here is the thing, the US Constitution was never intended to apply to Muslims.  If you read the preamble carefully, it says:

    “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    It says, “to ourselves and our POSTERITY.”  What is posterity?  There are two ways posterity can be interpreted, one is to mean they were referring to their literal biological descendents.  The other way of interpreting it is to invoke a serrogate type of relationship, which would mean ideological heirs.  Muslims are neither their descendents nor are they even remotely similar ideologically.  Therefore, it is obvious that the Constitution and our legal system was intended for civilized people, and never meant to apply to these moon worshipping animals.

    culturalenrichment2 

    They are not cut out to exist in our society, and our legal system is not cut out to deal with them.  We are talking about people who literally kill their own children.  Yes I know we have abortion here, but the Muslims will kill their children at any age and for any reason.  England is already gone.  They have sharia courts, honor killings, and now acid burnings.  I’m going to start referring to England as Englandistan. 

    Seriously. 

    Letting these people into our country is slitting our own throats.  The leadership on the left wants to let them in because they hate us, plain and simple.  The followers on the left want to let them in because they hate white people and Christianity, and we need fill the country with people who are radically different from us because having a cohesive national identity of our own is bad… Er… I mean, we need to be enriched.

    Seriously, grow up.  If you hate yourselves that much then punish yourselves privately, but stop supporting these leaders and policies that are hellbent on destroying our country and way of life.  If you think the Muslims are so great then go to their countries.  Try having a slut walk there and see what happens.

     

  • More Biased Anti-Israel “Journalism”

    I read another anti-Israel article published by the ridiculous media.  The title of this article is “Palestinian Officials: Obama Must Pressure Israel.”

    Source: http://news.yahoo.com/palestinian-officials-obama-must-pressure-israel-182405729.html

    This is another article that attempts to portray Israel as the aggressor and the “Palestinians”/Fakestinians as innocent victims.  Anyone who knows anything about the situation there, regardless of which side they prefer, knows that the Fakestinians are anything OTHER than innocent victims.

    First of all, I find it 100% dishonest and hypocritical for the Islamic world to pretend that there is any such thing as “Palestinians” and that they are some unique people group that needs to be protected.  They are always going on about how everyone is Arabs and Muslims, and how if they aren’t then they need to be.  They are constantly working to Arabize and Islamize the indigenous people of North Africa (Coptic Egyptians and Berbers), so it’s a dirty lie straight from Satan that they care about preserving any unique or indigenous people groups.  Dirty satanic agenda based lie.  Notice I’m not saying “from the pits of Hell,” like a lot of people will, because I don’t believe Satan is in Hell, I believe he is in the Middle East or the UN building in NY. 

    It’s ridiculous how they are always talking about how they are all Arabs, all Muslims, all one people, so if you mess with one of them you mess with all of them.  Oh but then the “Palestinians” are a unique and precious people which need to be protected.  The only difference between the Fakestinians and the Lebanese or Syrians is that they are more violent and rowdy.  Also, the Palestinians really are just Syrians and Jordanians, who happened to immigrate to the land that was given BACK to Israel.  But I digress, the point is they are hypocrites.

    The Fakestinians are innocent in the same way that my 2nd dog was innocent when she knocked over the trash can and spread the filth across the kitchen floor.  The dog was the only one who got into the trash, so any time it happened we knew who it was.  Same goes for the Fakestinians, we know who has the blood oath to obliterate Israel, and who, in general, believes in making war on non-believers. 

    So the Fakestinians want Obama’s help?  They want the Jews out of West Bank (Samaria), let’s not forget that the Samaratins were whittled down to a small number by thos savages, and that they have had to move to Israel proper in order to stay alive.  How dare they try to present themselves as the natives of Samaria when they drove the natives out?

    What the Fakestinians want is for Obama to force Israel to remove the Jews from Samaria.  But let me lay it out, Bush leaned on Israel to remove the Jews from Gaza, and they did.  But rather than things calming down in Gaza they have only gotten so much worse.  Hamas took over completely, and they started launching missiles and crap into Israel.  Because that is what Islam is.  Islam spreads by force, and they believe that once Islam takes an area it is never supposed to revert to infidels.  So when you give them something, rather than pacifying them they step up their efforts to get more.  We can see from Gaza that pulling out doesn’t help things.

    I am glad that Netanyahu has ignored Obama’s “advice.”  Obama is a piece of crap.  I don’t know what all this talk is about the “international community” disapproving of Israel. 

    What the mess is the “international community”?  What is this nebulous construct that the ridiculous left wing media keeps referring to?  Do they mean all people outside of Israel or just people outside of Israel who disapprove of Israel?  What do they mean?  Because, I’m not an Israeli guy and I strongly support Israel and have nothing but loathing and condemnation for their enemies.  Everyone I know personally also supports Israel.  In fact, I get the impression that in spite of the shoddy yellow journalism most people in the US support Israel.  I also know for a fact that India supports Israel, and has strong economic ties with them.  So where is this crap coming from?

    Are we talking about China?  Yea, there’s a great country for human rights.  If it’s China then they need to clean up their own house before talking about anyone else.  How about freeing Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Manchuria?  How about they stop killing and torturing Christians there?  But I can guess who they are probably talking about.  They are most likely talking about the Islamic world, and the liberals in Europe.  The liberals in Europe can get bent.  I don’t see what Israel has to do with them, unless they just have their panties in a knot because their ancesters didn’t kill enough Jews back in the 40′s. 

    If you are an atheist, agnostic, or deist living in Europe then you don’t have any reason either religious or economic to give a rip snort about whether the Jews or Fakestinians are in charge of Israel.  There is no oil in that area, so it’s not going to affect your gas prices, and don’t pretend like it’s about human rights violations, because the Muslim side has a bad track record on that which beats out anyone else in the world.  How many more acid burnings and honor killings need to happen in Europe before you people get the message?  Oh but yes, I forgot, you guys think that it’s all your fault the Muslims are violent because you guys are white, and everything that’s wrong in the world is the white man’s fault.

    I hope that Israel continues to settle Samaria, and I hope that the Jewish people who go there will have lots of kids.  Settle it up Israel.  In fact, if I knew of a charity that donated money to the settlers then I would donate to it.

    Also, why should Israel have to share Jerusalem with the Muslims?  I see these people whining about how Jews are settling certain parts of Jerusalem.  Well, why should Muslims get any part in Jerusalem?  Which part of Mecca is going to go to the Jews?  None?  OK then they don’t get a piece of Jerusalem.  Who do these people think they are, having such gall?  They are lucky that I am not in charge of Israel because I wouldn’t put up with half the crap from them that Israel does.

    I find it endlessly disappointing, but not at all surprsing, how hostile Barack Osama and the Dems are toward Israel.  But you know what, Israel is right not to listen to Obama.  Even if Israel loses the US government as an ally then they still have God on their side.  The recreation of Israel is a fulfillment of prophecy, and God isn’t going to let them be destroyed, not by anyone in the world.  Not by any savage durka durka’s, and not by any self righteous dope smoking hippies.  Israel will survive, but some of the blessings of God will be withdrawn from the US.  Just like how the same percentage our our population was displaced by Katrina as the percentage of the population of Israel which was displaced by the forced relocation of settlers in Gaza. 

  • Disrespectful Entry on Training a Man

    I saw this flagrantly disrespectful entry on Datingish called “Stay! Sit! Play Dead!” and it was advice for women on how to train their man.  They were attempting to draw an analogy between dog training and inducing a desired behavior in the man.  This entry has to be one of the most disgusting and disrespectful things I have seen in a long time.  Imagine if a man had written an entry like that about women, where everything was the same except for the genders being reversed.  The feminists, and the majority of other women, would eat his brains out. 

    I am going to repost it here before they take it down:

    This post was submitted by Alison Seymour.

    Today I spoke to a married friend of mine who complained about her husband’s apathy towards helping her out around the house. She wishes he complimented her more, that he would be more motivated to get into shape for her, etc. Her struggles reminded me of the hilarious book, “What Shamu taught me about a happy marriage,” written by the brilliant Amy Sutherland.

    Amy writes:  “My husband Scott is well read, adventurous and makes me laugh: I love him. But he’s also forgetful, untidy and a terrible time keeper. He suffers from serious bouts of spousal deafness, but never fails to hear me when I curse him under my breath from afar. Some years ago we took possession of Dixie, an eight-week-old excitable puppy that I took to obedience class. Over six weeks, I watched her transform and marveled at how I had managed to change and control another species. I wrote in my diary: ‘Try on husband.’ I did – and it worked.” 

    The goal here isn’t to try to control someone else but really to learn how to make your boundaries known and stick to them so you won’t one day be repeating my friend’s wish list as your own. 

    Nagging won’t work, not only will it not work but it’s counterproductive. Dog trainers don’t nag their pets! Instead of pointing a finger, make a big deal about rewarding the behavior that you like and ignore the rest, and do so on a consistent basis. Punishing the behavior you don’t like will most likely lead to more of that behavior. Animal trainers use a technique called L.R.S, which is the Least Reinforcing System, this is where trainers will act completely aloof when the animal does something wrong.

    L.R.S is based on the principle that any response fuels a behavior so if there’s no response at all, the behavior will decrease over time. If you want to reap the benefits of L.R.S, you gotta bite your tongue when your guy does that thing you hate. Use this opportunity as a test of your patience – breathe in, breathe out, namaste. We are all reward-seeking, and nobody likes to feel bad about themselves.  Eventually your dude will naturally stop doing the things you hate because it will get him nowhere. He will do more of the things you want him to do because it will be in his best interest to do so as it will result in special dinners for him and extra attention between the sheets. Ta-da, winning!

    How do you feel about this form of ‘training’? Has it worked for you? Would you try it?

    Source: http://www.datingish.com/771567708/stay-sit-play-dead/?page=1&jump=1528025629&leftcmt=1#1528025629

    First of all, you don’t go to strangers with your relationship problems.  You resolve them between you like adults, and if you can’t do that for any reason then one or both of you is not cut out for being in an adult relationship. 

    Second, what the mess is spousal deafness?  Oh… is he untidy and a poor timekeeper, my heart just bleeds for you.  Oh yes it does… OK not really.  So he still manages to hear when you curse him?  Why are you cursing him in the first place?  Where is your sense of propriety?  Try cursing your husband or complaining about his untidiness in a non-white country.  Pick any non-white country.  You know what you will get?  A smack across the face, and if you don’t like it there is nothing you can do.  You can’t take him to court, and if you try then they are just going to tell you to shut up and stop wasting their time.  If you’re in an Islamic country you might get an acid shower for cusring your husband.  There is no man more demonized than the white western male, and at the same time there is no man who treats women better, on average, than the white western male.  That is why we have the highest level of interracial and international marketability, because in spite of all the PC bullcrap, most women are aware of this FACT.  But I digress, if she is cursing her man, then there is a fatal flaw in the relationship with either her, or him.  Since she is the one talking about it online my guess is that it’s her. 

    I used to have girlfriends that talked about me online, even though I bent over backwards to make them happy and give them whatever they wanted.  That was before I woke up fully to reality.  When you spoil someone like that, they come to feel entitled, and rather than appreciate what you do for them they treat you like crap when you don’t do it or if you don’t do it fast enough.  We see the same thing from the welfare crowd.

    I still can’t get past the dog training analogy.  I like dogs.  In fact, in general I like dogs better than I like humans, but talking about training a man like training an animal is both degrading and backwards.  You don’t train a man, you find someone who you can deal with and you deal with it.  If you can’t deal succesfully with anyone then it’s probably a personal flaw.  Who died and made that woman so special?  I don’t believe in putting women on pedistals.  If you treat them like a queen then they will treat you like a servant.

    To me, this article is reflective of the sour rancid and domineering attitude that a lot of women have these days.  I said a lot, not all, so there is no reason to scream.  But when it comes down to things like this, I am reminded of why I decided to look overseas for a bride rather than domestically.  And yes, I caught some flak when I told certain people about what I was doing.  I got flak from feminists who were angry with me for bucking their carefully established boundaries, and I got some grief from “white knights” who told me that I was being disrespectful to women here, or disloyal (If you listen carefully enough you might hear the sound of me not caring).  I also caught some crap from white supremacists who said I had a duty to reproduce white children no matter how much crap the woman puts me through (hey there’s an idea for you extreme feminists, you can hook it up with the white supremacists).  But at the end of the day, I believe that my decision was the correct one. 

    The fact is, there is such an impetus in our culture to degrade men.  If you look at the TV shows you can see that the man is always getting in trouble with the woman, and that he’s afraid of his wife, and the intelligent and crafty wife is always having to chastise and correct the foolish and wayward husband.  What kind of message does that send?  They also portray fathers in a negative light in a lot of the teen and tween shows.  The father is always out of touch, and has to be set straight by his kids and his wife. 

    Our culture is not well, and the changes the left has made to our culture are anything but progress.

    This is all backwards.  I wasn’t planning on ranting on this next, but after seeing this I had to say something.

  • Overly Sensitive

    So John McCain commented saying that Ahmedinejad was a monkey.  The comment was in reference to the fact that the Iranian government has sent a monkey into space and that Ahmedinejad said that he wants to be the first Iranian in space.  McCain said, “So Ahmadinejad wants to be first Iranian in space – wasn’t he just there last week? “Iran launches monkey into space”"

    McCain was immediately attacked and called racist and insensitive by another Republican senator, Justin Amash.  OK, let me make two things clear.  First of all, I don’t care about McCain, he is a punk, but I also don’t care for all this sensitivity bullcrap.  The comment was not racist.  Ahmadinejad is a stupid looking guy, and he has sticking out ears just like Bush Jr.  If it’s not racist to call Bush a monkey based on his looks + low intelligence then neither is it racist to call Ahmadenijad a monkey. 

    Ahmadenijad looks like a monkey, and he is a serious enemy of ours.  Why spare his feelings?  He’s a punk.  Also, the US government defines all persons indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa as white, which I don’t think is justified but it does, so in US government-speak this isn’t racist, since McCain is also defined as white.  I think that Iranians and Armenians should be classified as white but not Arabs or Turks.

    Also, I doubt that the majority of Iranians would take offense to Ahmadinejad, a.k.a. Little Hitler being called a monkey.  Most patriotic Iranians will tell you that Little Hitler is actually a Turk, and that his Farsi is not proper.  Little Hitler was the enemy of the Iranian people before he was our enemy.  Most Iranians do not want to be associated with that punk Durkadinejad.  A lot of them are irritated that this clown has come to be the face of Iran as far as the international community is concerned.

    Little Hitler should be disrespected.  I’m tired of being told that we should respect and show sensitivity toward people who deserve neither.  At some point the insanity has to stop.

    Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/mccain-iran-president-monkey-161256673–politics.html;_ylt=ArXqJMz5cD88ZPUgbjA.wfDNt.d_;_ylu=X3oDMTUwZXYzY3NpBGNjb2RlA2N0LmMEbWl0A0FydGljbGUgTW9zdCBQb3B1bGFyBHBrZwM0MzYxODFmNC1lNzYyLTM5YjgtYjgxOS03OWMyOWIxYjUwOWQEcG9zAzIEc2VjA01lZGlhQkxpc3RNaXhlZE1vc3RQb3B1bGFyQ0FUZW1wBHZlcgMzY2YzMmU4My02ZWYxLTExZTItYWZmNi1lMWVkM2I0M2UyY2Q-;_ylg=X3oDMTQwcGpvZmQ0BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDNjBmYjBmZjMtNDdmMy0zNTNjLWExN2UtNjI5YmI4NzdiOTg0BHBzdGNhdANwb2xpdGljc3x0aGV0aWNrZXQEcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QDaWJfc2t5c2NyYXBlcl9yZWxhdGVk;_ylv=3

  • Drone Attacks Planned on US Citizens

    This ought to be enough to make any sane and/or non-retarded person never vote Democrat again.

    Source: http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/04/16843014-exclusive-justice-department-memo-reveals-legal-case-for-drone-strikes-on-americans?lite

    Instead, it says, an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”

    As in Holder’s speech, the confidential memo lays out a three-part test that would make targeted killings of American lawful: In addition to the suspect being an imminent threat, capture of the target must be “infeasible, and the strike must be conducted according to “law of war principles.” But the memo elaborates on some of these factors in ways that go beyond what the attorney general said publicly. For example, it states that U.S. officials may consider whether an attempted capture of a suspect would pose an “undue risk” to U.S. personnel involved in such an operation. If so, U.S. officials could determine that the capture operation of the targeted American would not be feasible, making it lawful for the U.S. government to order a killing instead, the memo concludes.

    And yes, they do want to deploy drones over the US.  It is on their list of things to do.  The fact is we have an unlawful adminstration which sees us as their enemy.  We have an adminstration who is loyal to outside forces, such as the UN, who opposes both our sovereignty and our personal freedom.

    A recent Department of Defense report to Congress as well as a number of media investigations have exposed government plans to deploy tens of thousands of drones over the US mainland in the coming years.

    An investigative report published over the weekend by the Christian Science Monitor cited the government’s own estimates that “as many as 30,000 drones could be part of intelligence gathering and law enforcement here in the United States within the next ten years.”

    Source: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2012/06/dron-j18.html

    Anyone who would still seriously consider voting for the Democrats again after this egregous affront to our freedom and privacy has to be out of their mind, retarded, or demon possessed.

    Both Obama and Eric Holder should have been impeached and kicked out a long time ago.  They are both scum.  Even the ACLU, which is well known to be a crack pot ultra left wing organization, recognizes the danger of this.  The parameters the Obama adminstration presents are highly subjective, and could be stretched to include anything.  Of course, they could kill whoever they want with these drones, and simply not reveal any more information as to why the operation took place than they care to.  This is a huge crock.

    The Republicans are worthless for not holding these enemies on US soil accountable.  What are the Republicans doing?  They never should have given Obama a moment’s peace.  They never should have dropped the birth certificate issue, or Fast and the Furious.  Now we have Benghazi, and on top of that this.  Also, let’s not forget how many of our enemies Obama is giving money to, and let’s not forget about Agenda 21.  Why aren’t the Republicans doing anything about agenda 21?

    Anyone who shoots down any of these drones is a hero in my book.  Please shoot the drones down guys.

    Now we also have micro drones to worry about:

    LONDON (AP) — British soldiers in Afghanistan have been issued with surveillance drones so small they can fit in the palm of a man’s hand.

    The Scandinavian-designed Black Hornet Nano weighs as little as 16 grams (roughly half an ounce) — the same as a finch. The 4-inch (10-centimeter) -long helicopter is fitted with a tiny camera which relays still images and video to a remote terminal.

    “We used it to look for insurgent firing points and check out exposed areas of the ground before crossing, which is a real asset,” said Sgt. Christopher Petherbridge, with Britain’s Brigade Reconnaissance Force. In a statement, he called the Hornet easy to operate and said it offered “amazing capability to the guys on the ground.”

    The military said Sunday that the toy-like Hornet is capable of flying even in windy conditions.

    It said the Hornet was developed by Norway’s Prox Dynamics AS as part of a 20 million-pound ($31 million) contract for 160 units with southern England’s Marlborough Communications Ltd.

    Drones of all shapes and sizes have rapidly become a mainstay of U.S., British and other nations’ military operations around the world. Late last year the U.K. said it was doubling the size of its armed drone fleet in Afghanistan to 10 with the purchase of a new batch of Reapers.

    Source: http://news.yahoo.com/uk-sends-hand-held-helicopter-drones-war-zone-101428321–finance.html

    This reminds me of something I read in Revelation:

    3 And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.

    4 And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.

    5 And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion, when he striketh a man.

    6 And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

    7 And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men.

    8 And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions.

    9 And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle.

    10 And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months.

    –Revelation 9:2-10

    When I was a little kid the book of Revelation always terrified me.  It is full of such frightening imagery, much of which is difficult to imagine, and the most frightening thing about it, is that it is yet to come.  But another frightening aspect, is that it is going to come with world government. That means that there will be no place to go to get away from all of this.  Or almost no place, there may be some free enclaves of people that will be continually hunted, and there MAY be some places where the control is not quite so absolute, but we can’t count on maybe.

    That being said, I found this particular passage especially disturbing when I was younger. What does it mean? When I was young I concluded that it was talking about some kind of hideous biological monstors, because the morphology of the creatures are all refrenced in biological terms. Tails like scorpions, bodies like locusts, faces like men, etc. What does it mean? It sounds like a horrible nightmare chimera.

    But let’s think about it. Whatever these things are they are metallic (verse 9), and even though they have some insectoid characteristics they do not eat (verse 4). Or at least, they do not eat such things as are the normal eating habits of locusts.

    What could make a sound like many horses running?   A chopper blade, like what we already have on helicopters today.  I think that what John the Revelator was talking about was some kind of drones.  Think about it.  If you have a 1st century man being shown modern, or futuristic technology then how is he going to describe it without all of the modern jargon being available to him?  He is going to compare it with things that are present in his time.  If it’s something that moves, then the comparison is going to be to biological life forms.  Such a man might describe a TV as a moving tapestry.  He might describe an airplane as a metal bird which shouts like thunder as it flies.  Think about it.

    That’s all I have to say on this one.