December 5, 2012
-
What is an Alpha Male
This entry was inspired by a few different people I have seen online who self identified, sometimes in bragging ways, as being an Alpha male. In some cases they may have been correct, but in most cases it strikes me as a hallow and meaningless boast. Especially when the boast comes from either liberals or ghetto-ites.
First let us discuss exactly what an alpha male is. In biology, and zoology, the term “alpha male” typically refers to the leader of the pack among pack animals, such as canids. The alpha male is either the most powerful male in the pack, or is perceived by the others as being so. The alpha male is free to have intercourse with any of the females in the pack, and if another male wants the same female he has to yield or fight about it. The same is true if another male is chewing on a piece of meat and the alpha male decides he wants it. If he chooses to fight about it then he runs a severe risk of getting ripped to shreds. If he fights and wins then he becomes the new alpha male by default. Alpha = power, and in the world of nature it is synonymous with the male who has the most power.
When dealing with humans the term alpha male carries a very similar meaning (men with the most power and influence), but with one key difference: Power is not directly related to physical strength in most cases.
There are two components which are absolutely indespensable for being a human alpha male:
1) Having power
2) Using it effectively, which results in dominance
I believe that the majority of alpha males do not typically go around stating that they are alpha males, because they know what they have and what they can get, so any such statement would be gratuitous. Typically the “men” who go around boasting about being an alpha male are actually beta men who want to be alphas. When it comes to liberal men I don’t really need to state why they are not alpha men, so I am going to skip over them and talk specifically about the ghetto-ites, gang bangers, thugs, pimps, and general whoremongers.
“Bangin lot’s a hoes” does not make one an alpha male, neither does beating on a woman. Let us look at it this way. Suppose that we divide up the supply of women into a heirarchy based on the primary factors that most men care about: physical attractiveness, youth, and physical fitness. For the sake of argument let us also add in education, which is not necessarily a deal maker or breaker but it is something that many men also care about.
Here are some graphs to represent the supply of women (Warning: Before anyone fusses at me about “objectifying” women please keep in mind that women also apply ratings to men based on their own criteria. If it’s not wrong for women to do it then it’s not wrong for men. In any case, objectivity is necessary in order to understand reality):
So if one were to group women based on the quantity of the desired characteristics they have plus the abundance level (or quantity) at which they possess each characteristic, then you are going to end up with diminishing numbers as qualities and quantities go up.
The very bottom rung would consist of women who are either undesireable or less desirable for a variety of reasons. The bottom rung may includes women who are physically unattractive, women who have had sex with so many different partners that they are considered irreversably contaminated or low, women who have children outside of wedlock, women who are single but who have aged past their prime, etc. etc. The gang bangers, hoodsters, pimps, whoremongers, etc., may have intercourse with a variety of women, may dominate and use those women, and they may even physically abuse them, but they always draw their women from the bottom rung, or at best the bottom two rungs.
I had one of these sorts brag to me that he has banged more women than there are hairs on my head (which of course includes facial hair), and while that may be true, it is nothing to boast about. It is like a man boasting that he is good at playing darts because he hits the wall each time. Any beta male with low or no standards can easily copulate with women from the bottom rung, and he can do so without any strings attached. But if those same thugs want to move up to the third rung it is going to be extremely difficult for them because the women in the 3rd rung will have higher expectations, and the odds are that the bottom feeding whoremonger does not know how to effectively socialize with women from that level. Also, women from that level have more options when it comes to choosing mates, so money, career, and intelligence are going to be used as filters on any male candidates that approach them. If they want to move up to the 4th level (green) then they will not stand a chance, because women also sort men based on their own heirarchy.
The average beta male probably has access to the bottom three levels of the pyramid. If he plays his cards right maybe he can move up but that is extremely difficult. A true alpha male has access to every level of the pyramid. The alpha male can pair with women from the bottom rung, but the thugs and gangbangers who typically run with those women do not have access to any women on the top rung.
When I think of alpha men I think of the sorts of men who live in my parents neighborhood, which is an upper middle class to upper class neighborhood. I can bench press more than most of them, I can also run further and faster than many of them. BUT, in terms of real power what I have is just a small fraction of what they have. “Well I can beat up most of those guys,” the thug might say. Yes, maybe you can, and then you can go to jail and get sodomized until you have to wear a diaper to keep your fudge from falling out. At that point you are not an alpha by any standard, in fact you aren’t even a beta, you’re just a bottom. The fact is that intelligence + marketability = wealth, and wealth = power.
The man with more funds at his disposal has the ability to make more things happen, and to buy greater security for himself. He can also offer a woman more security, as well as a much more lavish lifestyle. IF you have any sort of conflict with such a man and it goes to court then he is going to have the better lawyer. The end result of all this is that the alpha male gets what he wants. If he decides he wants a boat he gets a boat. If he wants to live in a different neighborhood he gets up and moves. If he wants lots of space around him he gets an estate. If he wants to live in a crowded place like NYC and STILL have lots of space around him then he gets that. If he wants a woman with any particular set of characteristics he gets her. He is not limited by looks and physical strength in the same way that the beta male is.
One day I was driving into my parents neighborhood and I saw a bunch of families out. The men had different physiques, ages, hair colors, amounts of hair, etc., but the women were all fairly uniform. All of the women were blond, all of them were thin or athletic, and they were all about the same height. They also all had good facial structures, although I personally did not care for the way their skin looked as they were all tanned and had apparently been doing so for some time. When I saw this I could not help wondering that if, over time, and assuming that the government does not interfere too much, the upper class people will begin to have a uniform look. But upon further reflection I concluded that this was not the case. The fact is those men represent an older generation, I would say they were mostly in their 40′s and 50′s, and many of the white males belonging to generations older than myself have a preference for tanned blondes, while the younger generations of men have their own preferences. That being said, the fact is that those sorts of women were in short supply when those men were looking for wives, and they still are, but because of their wealth and power they were able to overcome the supply issues (which beta men typically cannot) and get what they want.
That is what it means to be an alpha man. A punk with something to prove is not an alpha man.
In case anyone is interested, no I do not consider myself to be an alpha male (I do consider myself to be a lone wolf). I did finally manage to get the sort of woman I wanted but I had to go to great lengths and personal risk to do so. I also had to look overseas to population pools where different sets of factors were at play. I highly reccomend India. I have heard good things about China, but I would stay away from the Phillippines.
Comments (6)
I have no interest in being the alpha male except that one part about having sex with all the women in the pack.
This is interesting. I would consider my boyfriend an emerging Alpha Male (though he wouldn’t), which is why he’s so hot. He’s still in college and has an almost 4.0 GPA studying Mechanical Engineering. Hasn’t landed the career yet but definitely will. Has a very engaging but modest personality, is driven and responsible, can get along with anyone despite the fact that he’s a damn genius, and he also has the appearance of a leader (he’s 6’2″ and strong). The only exception is the fact that he does take pride in his physical appearance and fitness.
I’m noticing an alarming trend which may contradict your rational-but-degrading hierarchy of standards. What I imagine is a result of our feminizing culture, women no longer seem to expect a man to provide for her and their children– or even himself. There is no longer shame in a man who is a failure as a provider. It’s unbelievable.
@TheTheologiansCafe - Same here, but minus the lots of sex. I just want a wife, kids, privacy, and freedom. If no one else bothers me I won’t bother them.
@DrummingMediocrity - Based on what you just said I would have to say that I agree with your assessment of your boyfriend. It’s a good set up for you because once he does have a good job then you can get married and quite your crap job. You can probably then stay home, or go back to school for a different degree, or whatever. Being an alpha male doesn’t mean that the guy doesn’t care about his looks. He can care or not care, but his power and influence enable he wields allow him to compensate for some deficiencies in the area of looks.
You’re right about the culture being feminized, but feminism doesn’t hurt guys like your boyfriend very much. The thing is, even if 99.99% of women become hagravens… I mean feminists, the alpha male still has access to the 0.01% who are still decent and marriageable. You never have 100% of the people in any society completely buying into the same ideology, feminism and libtardism included. Now, the polygamous alpha male who just wants to use his power to bang as many women as possible is actually enabled by feminism. You have all sorts of feminists who think it is liberating to engage in uncommitted sex with multiple partners, so the polygamous alpha male who just wants to tap as many vaginas as possible is able to go about his business. He will hit all of the “liberated” women, whether they be college students, or “career women” who can’t be bothered with marriage and family. They are ready and willing tools for such men. The bottom feeding whoremonger who just wants to hit all the desperate women, and who can only do that, will still be able to engage in uncommitted sex with lowly and desperate women.
The people who are most hurt by feminism are the mid-range or beta men (which is most men in any given culture), and the majority of women. Marriage used to be the primary means through which women attained status and security. In other parts of the world it still is. The problem is that feminism makes women less appealing to men, and thus less marketable. Most men don’t want to be permanently yoked with a woman that continually tries to dominate them, demean them, or usurp traditional male responsibilities from them. As a result we have a climate that causes more men to shy away from marriage and become “players”/whoremongers, or in some cases to become homosexuals. Mid-range guys who want to be traditional men and engage in a permanent monogamous marital relationship are finding it increasingly difficult with feminism. That is why I eventually decided to try to find a wife over in India, where the gross majority of women are still quite traditional. I found what I was looking for, but on the other hand there is now some woman in the US that is going to miss out on me. I don’t regret that, nor am I intending to sound arrogant or spiteful, but the fact is in a properly functioning society I would not have had to do that, or even perceived that I had to do that. The fact that I did that creates an offset in the supply of men, creating a surplus in the supply of women. That sort of situation is good for the polygamous alpha male, but bad for the women. I know I’m just one guy, but I’m not the only one who did something like that, and the number of guys who have a preference for foreign women is increasing. After a while it all adds up, and it is a problem that will have to be addressed, but it can only be addressed by re-assessing the culture. No amount of legislation is going to make a positive impact on that.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Eh, you assume I’m more angelic than I am (;. Neither he nor I are interested in marriage (and I refuse to have children, EVER… but I do want lots of doggies, especially corgis). Also I’d rather die than be a houswife, I think. I’m career-oriented and I’d prefer not to depend on someone else financially (that doesn’t mean I don’t like gifts, though!
)
I’m not a virgin and nothing close to it… but the idea that sex is as meaningless as shopping for clothes is stupid as hell, not to mention repulsive. I cringe at whoredom from both genders, though I do my best to mind my own business when it comes to those I know personally. All that said, I am monogamous and would like to be with him for the rest of my life.
I find it ironic that Feminists seem to justify the horrendous treatment of women in the Middle East by the asinine notion of “cultural tolerance” which is a buzzword that really means “prideless spineless, servitude to savages” yet cringe whenever a man holds the door for them. That just tells you what their real agenda is.
Interesting comparison to marriage, I think. I also think less women are interested in it and less dependent on marriage since they can support themselves. Nothing wrong with that, but it becomes a problem when there are countless single parents who bare behaviorally undisciplined, emotionally unstable bastards (bastards in the real sense, not the derogatory term) who will grow up without positive and consistent role models. I think welfare has a lot to do with this, especially for black america which has degraded immeasurably since the “great” society. There is no excuse for baring unnecessary children with the extreme availability of birth control out there. NO EXCUSE.
It sounds like you found the woman of your dreams. I always have loved Indian hair. I wish mine were that thick and perfect.
@DrummingMediocrity - Well, your own life choices are entirely up to you. I was just going through some options. Having kids isn’t for everyone. I would like to have a few myself though, if I ever become wealthy I would probably have more than a few in order to make up for white decline a little. I do think that given how much you hate your job it might be worth it to go back through school and get a different degree, assuming that you have the endurance for that. I have already been through school twice, so for me the thought of going back to school for any reason gives me nightmares, literally.
I too cringe at whoredom for both genders. I don’t care for the double standard of women being slutty if they have lots of sex but guys being cool. Either something is objectively true, right, or wrong, or it’s nothing. I find it hilarious how they think they are liberating themselves by having sex with lots of men, when really they have just degraded themselves to the level of village bicycles and are being taken advantage of.
Exactly. To me feminism is just the female version of Islam, where instead of the men being being ridiculously tyrannical and abusive the women take on that role and whip the men. I think it would be great if all of the Muslims and feminists could be sent to another planet and just left alone to deal with one another. I have some big rants on the way for Islam, and for feminism. I keep coming back to those issues and ranting again whenever the frustration reaches a certain level.
Yea, welfare, new deal, and great society have decimated the black community. I also find it interesting how black men are so eager to bail on their women, or so they seem to be. Unfortunately the reason why they bang out more kids they can’t support is because the government pays them to. It’s bloody ridiculous. I think in the black community the men are the primary ones at fault for the condition of their culture. With white people I think liberalism and feminism has a lot to do with our problems. Here is an article about the role that feminism plays: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/24/war-on-men/#ixzz2DQvP9nf5
Pretty much so. Will send you a note.