@CryingInColor - Bollox, when Obama came into power he had a Democrat majority in both houses.  What he did was A) Continue all of the bad Bush policies and B) implement all kinds of bad policies of his own.  I don’t want to give him another chance to double gas prices, double the federal deficit, raise taxes, weaken our military further, and sign sovereignty compromising treaties with the UN (which I do not recognize as an authority).  

This guy is the most crooked politician ever, and now he’s putting drones over the country.  Why?  Those drones caused all sorts of collatoral and accidental damage in Pakistan and Afghanistan.  There is no reason to deploy them over the US.
I don’t want Obama’s kind of change.  I would rather have guns, money, and religion than a big brother state getting up in my business.  This man wants to regulate and control everything.  The only kind of change I want is to change things back.

See, your way of thinking is fundamentally different than mine is.  Governments don’t give rights, they can only either respect them or impinge upon them.  Abortion is not a right, it’s infanticide, but even if you are pro-abortion you should have learned by now that nothing is ever going to be done about abortion.  Candidates mention abortion to get votes, and that’s it, either no one ever wants to make a difference or no one can.  Of course even if abortion were illegal you could avoid getting in trouble by not having sex.  Don’t tell me it’s hard to not have sex.  I’m 31 and I never had it, and I’m a guy so my sex drive is a good deal more active and unwieldy than yours is.

@CryingInColor - I don’t think so.  You’re a still a woman.  Sex drive is generated by testosterone, and it’s a scientific fact that women have 65% less testosterone than men, on average.  In order to have the same level of sex drive as me you need to have at least a comparable level of testosterone, and it’s obvious that you don’t.  I’m not seeing any hair on that chest (which would be obvious if you had any due to the amount of cleavage you’re showing), nor any hair on that face.  While it is entirely possible, and probable, that you have less inhibitions and self control than I, it is impossible for you to have a higher sex drive without artificially injecting yourself with androgens.

What you liberals don’t understand is that there is such a thing as self-control and personal responsibility.  You want to be able to do whatever you want and have other people pay for it, but guess what, not everyone wants to pay for it.  I haven’t had sex because I’m not married yet, and I didn’t get married because of on and of financial difficulties.  I will however be getting married soon, and once that is done there are certainly going to be some lifestyle changes, but having sex outside of marriage and getting married before either you or your spouse have the ability to support your children are both bloody irresponsible. Whatever you do you need to take responsibility for it yourself.

My position on abortion is that it is murder, but I accept that there is nothing that can be done about it.  On the bright side abortion takes a lot of potential liberals out of the gene pool, so how can I complain?  You all are waging a eugenic war on yourselves without even being made to do so by a government.

@CryingInColor - More of an anarcho-nationalist really, but I tend to vote Republican at the national level.  To answer your question, it’s just a matter of discipline.  Discipline is doing what needs to be done regardless of what kind of mood you are in.  There is passion, and there is intellect, to be disciplined you must use your intellect as the primary decision maker rather than your emotions, or your hormones.  And BTW, for men sex is mostly hormonal rather than emotional.  Asking me why I haven’t had sex yet is a fair question, but it’s also akin to asking me why I don’t go out and beat up the neighbors for playing their music too loud.  You just have to stop and think before you do things.  

I do not support rules and regulations, and I don’t recognize the idea that other people have a right to my money just because they don’t have a job.  Obama is the welfare president.  Nearly half the people in the country are living off the government now, thanks to this man.  I don’t even make that much money.  I bring home less than 2000 a month, and the Federal Government takes about 300, while my state government takes about 100.  Even though I had a great GPA and references I was not able to get a job in my field, so I had to take whatever I could get within reason.  Now Obama wants to raise taxes on my employer.  If that happens, then it throws a monkey wrench in my plans for marriage and child rearing.  I’m going to have to go overseas for work if my employer goes out of business.  I don’t care if Obama wants to give money to poor people because I don’t recognize the idea that they are entitled to my money.

I don’t really fight against abortion because it’s a futile waste of time, and while I disagree with it, I also recognize that it as a practice does some good for the gene pool.  I will never approve of absolve anyone who kills their child for any reason, but at the same time there are so many people who are better off never being born.  But in response to what you said, abortion isn’t a “right to choose.”  You make your choice when you unzip your pants, and you know, no one takes a breath until after birth.  To assign any date to when the baby is human and when it’s not is 100% subjective and arbitrary.  
You know, Ryan and Romney are not anti-abortion.  If they were then they would not support abortion in cases of rape.  The anti-abortion argument is that life begins at conception, and therefore to terminate that life is murder regardless of the circumstances of conception, no exceptions.  No one does anything about abortions.  Bush didn’t do anything about abortion, and until the country breaks up nothing will be done about it on any level.  That being said, if you value your personal survival you ought to vote for Romney.  Obama is not the president of jobs, he’s the president of handouts, dependency, and internationalism.  He is not going to stimulate the economy at all.  What he will do is raise taxes on employers, and whatever temporary increase in Federal tax revenue there is he will offset with increased government spending.  That is OBama.