November 5, 2012
-
Ignorance is Dangerous
For a long time I have suspected that at least half the Obama supporters do not even know what Obama stands for, and among those that do there are a good deal of party loyalists who do not understand how the policies will affect the. As I have said before, the Democrats want to fill the country with people who will believe them when they say a dog is a duck.
If you are going to vote you should at least know what the candidates stand for, and how their policies will effect the country. If not, then for the love of everything that is good don’t vote.
Just look:
Comments (32)
Whenever I tell Obama supporters that they are hallucinating an alternate reality they think I’m only being mean.
But lets all be nice to ourselves and vote all Democrats out of office before they hallucinate the entire country into a reality of pure hell.
@PrisonerxOfxLove - That’s right brother, these bastards all have to go. Not a single one of them is any good.
Oh lord, that last one cracked me up. The woman is from my part of Ohio, so it’s kind of embarrassing for that to come from here.
These were all amusing, but it’s sad to see people this stupid.
@Marica0701 - And it’s scary that those people will go and vote.
“If Obama said it, it must be true!” Tragic, but funny. And extremely frustrating.
I’m going to meet up with some fellow Libertarians tomorrow for election night. If Obama wins, I am positively going to cry my fucking face off… or punch a hole into the wall. You never know with us womenz
@mtngirlsouth - It would be absolutely hilarious if it weren’t actually true.
@DrummingMediocrity - If that bastard wins again I’m going to buy a huge Confederate flag and hang it in my window.
@DrummingMediocrity - Libertarians = moronic scum that need to be lined up and shot.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - But… but… that’s RACIST!!!
@CanuckFascist - Fuck off commie
If that bastard Obamie the Commie wins, why I’ll… oh, wait, I’m CANADIAN. Do never mind.
@DrummingMediocrity - Such a shame, a woman as beautiful as you are is cursed with the disease of stupidity. Look at my name, moron. I am far, far, far from being a commie.
@CanuckFascist - You call yourself a fascist because you want attention. In reality, your Statist views show the same vile, opportunistic hatred of humanity as those shared by Communists.
@CanuckFascist - Why the hate for Libertarians? Listen, I consider all right wing people to be my brothers and sisters, whether they be Libertarians, Constitutionalists, Republicans, or anarcho-capitalists. I also consider all foreign right wing parties such as the EDL and the Likhud party to be kindrid spirits. What binds us all together is our love of freedom and self ownership, even if we have different nationalities and religious beliefs. I pretty much agree with everything you have to say about the left, and feel free to say whatever you want about the left, but I’m going to ask you to keep it civil when talking to my conservative brothers and sisters. Talking about shooting people for their political beliefs is crazy talk, and it’s the kind of thing that a left wing despot would do. You can’t just say stuff like that and expect people to take you seriously, unless they take you as a serious threat. I don’t even want to shoot all the liberals, even though I am firmly convinced that liberalism is a mental disorder.
For the record, I support nationalism but not particularly fascism. The problem with fascism is it gives too much power to government, just like communism. You can have nationalism without fascism because nationalism is 100% natural. People tend to naturally form communities based on shared values and beliefs, and tend to keep out people who are antithetical to their values and beliefs. Multiculturalism on the other hand, is unnatural and has to be forced on people. The best way to structure a society is to maximize freedom. You don’t want to go too far forcing people in or out. We could get rid of all the liberals without firing one bullet just by allowing nature to take it’s course, which would result in secession. There would be liberal states, conservative states, and in between states, and once we have our separate conservative states we could ban immigration from all the liberal states. It’s the perfect solution. I don’t want to use the government to try to force liberals to be conservatives. It’s better just to let them go. Without us they can’t last long anyways.
@DrummingMediocrity - Proof you are an idiot.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Fascism = authoritarianism of the very few, or the one. Democracy = authoritarianism of the majority.
I will continue to despise libertarians because they believe in chaos, as in TOO MUCH FREEDOM. To me, libertarians and anarchists are one and the same. Guess who else are anarchists. That’s right, the COMMUNISTS.
“
There would be liberal states, conservative
states, and in between states, and once we have our separate
conservative states we could ban immigration from all the liberal
states. It’s the perfect solution.”
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Absolute anarchy. I would never allow it. If you wish to be liberal, leave the country, or become a conservative. That’s my solution.
I am completely against multiculturalism. It is ridiculous to assume it would ever work. You see, liberals are FORCING their own views upon others via the weapon of ‘you be a racist bitch’. Remember, you punch a Black man in the face, you serve greater time for assault than if you punch a White man in the face. That is insane, something I would never kowtow to. My way is equality. If you punch a Black man in the face, that’s assault. If you punch a White man in the face, that’s assault. SAME TIME IN JAIL. The colour is irrelevant.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - How can you support nationalism and libertarianism at the same time? They are polar opposites.
@DrummingMediocrity - No, I call myself a fascist because I am one. I admire the Nazis. I admire Mussolini. I admire Franco. I surely do not seek the attention of an uneducated libertarian.
@CanuckFascist - It’s overly simplistic to define fascism in that way. Oligarchy and Monarchy are authoritarianism of the few or the one, as for Democracy, I agree with you. Fascism involves reverence for the state and state mandated beliefs (which includes having speech and thought crimes). I have an IQ of 135. Supposedly Bush and Obama have IQ’s of 120. Given that, why should I consider their opinions on any matter more valid than mine?
Even if you despise them I still expect you to be civil to them on my page. There is no reason to talk about shooting people for their political beliefs. It is true that libertarianism is a stones throw away from anarchy, but it’s a common misperception that anarchy is left wing. There is no way communism would ever work without a government to enforce it. For certain these are complex issues. For some time I have been meaning to do a comprehensive entry on my political stance, which has changed over the years. I will probably do it some time this week, and I invite you to read it once it’s done. Hopefully everything will be explained in a way that will make sense to you.
@CanuckFascist - Since you’re Canadian you probably don’t know this, but the original legal document which the US was based upon was something called the “Articles of Confederation.” Originally the US was a confederacy, not a union. There were both Federalists and Confederates among the founding fathers. After the American Revolution the delegates from the different states met together to ammend the Articles, and instead they ended up drafting the Constitution. The Federalists won the argument at the time because the central government, such as it was, did not have any way of paying the soldiers who fought in the war. But under the original plan states would make their own laws, and if threatened by an external force they would work together to drive it out. The War Between the States was the second debate between Confederates and Federalists. I myself, although born in the north, consider myself to be a Confederate. I don’t want to kill the liberals, but I don’t want to share a country with them either. In my opinion they are mostly either seditious or useless. The smart ones are seditious, the dumb ones are useless. The best way for them to learn a lesson is to let them go their own way. They can have their countries and we can have ours. I don’t want to hang onto them under any circumstance.
It sounds like Canada has some ridiculous laws. But if you think that’s bad you should see what England is like.
Nationalism and Libertarianism are not polar opposites. Nationalism does not require force to exist, because it is 100% natural, and part of human nature. To say that nationalism must be encouraged by a state or forced by a state is like saying that the state must also encourage men to be attracted to women. There is no need to do either. I am going to write a more comprehensive entry on the subject, but in the meantime you might consider watching this man on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/ramzpaul
I don’t agree with everything this man says, but I do agree with about 90% of it.
Here is a good explanation of Nationalism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VoiYJfo98U&feature=plcp
@DrummingMediocrity - You mean one never knows with you libertarian nutcases.
@DrummingMediocrity is so afraid of me that she blocked me. *ROTFLMAO* I told you all libertarianism is for cowards.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Communism, which is NOT supposed to have a government, is forced to have one in order to ensure the people take part in the forced silliness that is communism. Remember, all communist states had walls, with gun towers to keep their people inside. In effect, they were jails. The communist governments were forced to understand that no two people are alike, therefore communism could never work, so they resorted to turning their worker’s paradises into jails.
You love your country, yet you have no reverence for the State? Most puzzling indeed.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Yes, I know about the USA and its Federalism and Confederacies. Canada is a federation. So, we went through a similar process, although we were not stupid enough to fight a war just to free Blacks.
Why not round up all the liberals/anarchists/libertarians, and toss them out of your country? I would have done that long ago. Their very thoughts are treasonous. It is much like I demand my government outlaw the Bloc Quebecois, and hang their leader for treason. No, I am quite serious about this. I was going to join the Conservative Party of Canada to push forth the destruction of the Bloc Quebecois and Parti Quebecois, but they have become too liberal for me. Too weak, if you will. I am dismayed we allow open sedition in our country. In fact, I am incredulous that we would allow a treasonous party to run for national office.
Nationalism is 100% natural? Uh, no, not in the slightest. Not in this day and age of multiculturalism. If we were all White, that could be true, but not with all the immigrants within the confines of all the White homelands. I step outside, and I hear more languages than I could shake a stick at. That alone enrages me. It also makes me realise that nationalism would be most difficult to push forth around such useless people. I have had such people act openly against the State, BECAUSE they are immigrants. The Tamils for example. I was in such a rage when they shut down my city of Toronto just because my Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, refused to do anything about the Ceylon conflict. Their actions cost my city MILLIONS of dollars. I had demanded my MP send in the riot squads, drive the bastards out of the city. I wanted to demand those riot squads start using rubber bullets on the motherfuckers, but I knew the RCMP would be on my ass. The Tamils were even openly threatening TRUE Canadians, true nationalistic Canadians, something I will not tolerate. Were I leader, I would have had such people arrested. Any of those Tamils hurt a nationalistic Canadian, the Tamil would have possibly been shot. That is anarchy, what the Tamils did. That is chaos. This would not be allowed in a fascist society. My people would be behind me. Guaranteed. Only the fucking LIBERALS would have said anything. They would have been silenced, but of course. This is the kind of society that you want? The Tamils were allowed to shut down my city because it was their *cough* RIGHT, as per our own constitution. How is it a right to threaten Canadians, to shut down a city, costing the taxpayer millions of dollars? This is the failure of democracy. Allowing people to fuck with your own country because such people are bitching about conditions in their ‘homeland’. Uh, if they are so concerned about their ‘homeland’, then why are they here, in Canada? Time to toss their brown asses out of Canada, and back to their beloved ‘homeland’. Fuck ‘em.
@CanuckFascist - Right on about communism.
I have a reverence for God, who is the ultimate authority, and governments are just people with no one governing them. The thing is, the state is not the people, it’s an entity that exists off of us. I care about my people, my culture, my way of life, and the things my people have achieved. My people can exist without those asshats in Washington. Without them we will elect our own leaders and keep out anyone we don’t like or whom we feel is culturally, socially, or morally incompatible with us.
“
Without them we will elect our own leaders
and keep out anyone we don’t like or whom we feel is culturally,
socially, or morally incompatible with us.”
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Hello, fascism.
You are free to believe in a God, but I am an atheist. The closest thing to a God to me would be the State. After all, I can see it, touch it, feel it, taste it.
@CanuckFascist - The Civil War was not simply about slavery. The fact is that there were abolitionists in the north and in the south, and there were slave holders in the north and in the south. My native state Missouri was a slave holding state which was also part of the Union during the War Between the States. Although slavery was certainly part of the platform for the politicians of the south, the essential basis of the rebellion was that the southerners did not want Lincoln for president. They felt that since they did not vote for him, and that the majority of people in their states did not want him, then they should not have to have him. So they rebelled and followed the leaders of their choosing. Lincoln waged a war on the south because he was against breaking up the union for any reason, and slavery was not abolished until after the war was already declared.
I don’t have anything against black people personally, regardless of what my detractors say. Actually my best friend is half black.
I would toss the liberals out by kicking their states out of the union, or by having our states secede from Washinton. I don’t really want any of their states, and anyways to me they are already a separate country. It’s only imperialism that binds us together politically.
I don’t know much about Canadian politics, but I say if they want to have their own country so much they should be allowed to have it, and once they have it you lock down the border with them and don’t let them into your country for any reason. Nationalism is the belief that every people group/nation is entitled to their own sovereignty. Or, if they identify closely with France maybe you can kick them back to France. I don’t know enough about those people to say much definitively on them.
Nationalism is natural, I’m telling you. People have a natural tendency to group and segregate themselves based on a variety of factors, but what it comes down to is who they have the most in common with. We have immigration because our governments force it on us, and they prevent local governments, such as state governments, from taking decisive action against it. Obama has sued Arizona because of an immigration law they passed at the state level, which they only passed because the damn federal government was not doing it’s job to begin with. In fact, Obama is taking more guards off the Mexican border. I know I’m saying a lot, but my point is that if we the people had a say on immigration then we would cut most of it off. It’s actually the white liberals who are the gateway for all this unwanted immigration. Maybe you think that some other races are inferior, but to me liberals are the inferior race. I don’t mind having different races around as long as they share my values and beliefs. I’m not bothered by the presence of people of other races or by race mixing, I’m just bothered by people who are not on my side. I have much more in common with a black conservative, like ET Williams or Alfonzo Rachel than I do with a white liberal. Also, it’s worth noting that the white liberals do not identifiy with us either. They identify more with the Mexicans and Muslims that they bring in than they do with white traditional Americans like me. The reason they bring in all these third world immigrants is because they hate us, and they want to wipe us out. If we were in charge we would not allow that kind of immigration. All of that garbage is artificial, and it has to be forced on people by left wing governments backed by militaries and police.
Regarding the Tamils, I would deport them if they are causing such disturbances. They are guests in your country so they should behave as guests, and if they don’t then the host has the right to boot the guest. Anyways, the Tamils already have a homeland. If they don’t like being dominated by non-Tamils then they should focus on seceding from India rather than causing trouble in Sri Lanka and Canada. Of course if you did have an anarchic situation there you could take a sub-machine gun and deal with the rioters yourself and not have to worry about being arrested or facing reprocussions from the government. Anyways, I’m not exactly an anarchist, but soon I will give a rundown of my political stance so that you and everyone else can understand.
@CanuckFascist - Not fascism, because I don’t want to have thought crimes or a police state. What I would have would be closer to the traditional method of human organization, which would be city elders and people taking responsibility for their own defense. Anyways I’ll give a detailed write down/run down on it.
If I were an atheist I would worship myself before I worshiped the government. Especially not the current government with Barack Osama and his hoodlums in charge. Also, if I were an atheist I would probably have killed myself tonight after what just happened. Now I have to watch my country be destroyed. The only reason I didn’t kill myself tonight was because I was afraid I would go to hell if I did.
wow that obama phone is appalling.
@AncoraImparo - It is apalling on the one hand, but on the other it’s a pretty good remix. I think that video pretty much accurately sums up what the Democrats are. Those are the kind of people they want to fill the country with because that is their most stable and reliable voting bloc.
It’s also because of people like that that I refuse to go to any pro-life rallies or anti-abortion protests.