September 14, 2012
-
Let’s put the Muslims under Sharia
One of my best friends is from the Netherlands. He immigrated to the US some time ago and has decided to stay because we have more space and freedom here, but he gave me a suggestion on how we should treat Muslims based on how they treat others. By others I mean both the native Christians and other religious minorities in their countries, and how they treat their hosts when they immigrate. So here is one possible solution to Islam which could ameliorate it’s effects on our societies.
Put Muslims under Sharia, and by that I don’t mean their own moon worshipping rapist Sharia, I mean taking their ideas and applying it to them. At least, those of them who live in our countries. So here it goes:
1) Muslims will not be allowed to build new mosques.
2) Muslims will not be allowed to make the call to prayer or do anything that causes noise publicly.
3) Muslims will not be allowed to repair damage to any existing mosques, or expand the size of their facilities without our permission. Even if they get damaged by a disaster or by some of our people, they still cannot fix it without our permission.
4) Muslims who want to remain practicing Muslims will have to pay a Jizya tax. Failure to pay the Jizya tax means that they will have to change their religion or get out. Of course infidels living under Islam would have to change their religion or die, but I’m cutting them a little break here.
5) They will be under no circumstances allowed to marry, date, or have sex with any of our women, but we can have whatever relations we want with their women.
6) They will not be allowed to say anything against Christianity or any of the other major religions practiced in our countries without facing legal actions. In their countries speaking out against Islam would be death, but again, I’m showing a little mercy here.
7) They will not be allowed to buy land from us, and if one of us buys land from them then the land can no longer be resold or returned to Muslim ownership.
8) If a Muslims changes their religion and decides that they want to change it back then they will not be allowed to, unless they want to be deported.
I think that’s all quite fair yes? It is considerably softer than the way they treat religious and ethnic minorities in their own countries. I have even waived off of the death penalty for 4, 6, and 8.
If we put these policies into place then not only would the Muslims who are already here cause less trouble for us, but more of them would be discouraged from coming here.
Or, to save time we could just deport all the Muslims now. We could rescue all the Coptic Christians and other religious minorities from the Middle East and bring them to the US. Then we could take all of the Muslims from the US and Europe and drop them all back in their homelands. That would be a winning scenario for both side. Not only would we be free of the Muslims, but they would also be free of us. They could have their pure Islamic paradise, and establish whatever “civilization” they wanted.
Comments (9)
I wondered the same thing myself, but I doubt that something like that would work.
@KnightInCROATIANarmor - I think it could work, but I doubt any of our governments would implement that. Everyone is too scared of Islam.
Good one.
I agree with freedom, and I also agree with ethnic profiling. Unfortunately there are now so many exceptions to the standard middle eastern terrorist that it’s not foolproof. We need to be careful about the people we let into our country who come from cultures which vilify ours. They should be thoroughly researched before entry, but I believe once they are here they are fully entitled to all the freedoms of any immigrant who resides in our country… until they fuck with us (or show inclination to).
so… you’re agreeing that it’s fine for them to do such things. otherwise, i don’t see why you’d advocate doing it to them.
@virtus1 - Thanks man, although I can’t take credit for originating these ideas.
@flapper_femme_fatale - Where did I say that? No, I’m all for balancing the scales. This is pure pragmatism here.
@DrummingMediocrity - I have no problem with profiling. If group X has a tendency to engage in destructive behavior then it’s logical to watch out for group X. You know during WWII I doubt they would have let Germans into the country as immigrants if they carried around a copy of Mein Kampf and wore a Nazi armband. We should do the same with the Muslims who come here with their Korans and hijabs and robes. To me a hijab or Muslim robe is like a German guy walking around with a Nazi armband. Nothing against Germans, but there is a problem with Nazis. Similarly there is nothing inherently wrong with being Middle Eastern, but we have to watch out for people who adhere to an ideology of unlimited conquest and genocide.
But back to profiling, this PC stuff is killing us. Deliberately not searching people who are likely to be our enemies, and randomly searching people who are not just to appear “fair and balanced.” Bias does not always have to be a bad thing, it could be that bias is hardwired into us because it has value as a defensive mechanism.
That being said, one thing is these peopel do need to learn to differentiate betwen Arabs and Indians, or Muslims and Sikhs. Indian people have needlessly gotten grief over mistaken identity.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - Interesting in the first part– Keep in mind that Jews were sent back to Europe at this time, despite the impending (and/or present) genocide. Thanks to FDR of course, the Socialist king of America.
I completely agree with everything, especially the ignorance of mistaking Indians with Muslims. In one of my last classes (senior-level), I had a moronic classmate who actually was proud to raise his hand and say “stereotypes are bad because if we think all indians are terrorists, like 9/11…” and I blurted out how stupid that was. People who are that ignorant should not receive a Bachelor’s Degree, or even a High School Diploma…