I want to tackle a few issues at once.

Romney’s 47% Comment:

The left seems to be having a spazfit over Romney’s comment about 47% of the people in the US having a victim mentality.  I don’t know whether or not it will really hurt him.  Among conservative voters it will not, and among die hard Republican voters it will not.  In spite of all the hype, there is really nothing at all contraversial about what he said. 

“There are 47% of the people who will vote for the president no matter what.  All right, there are 47% of the people who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who they believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.  That’s an entitlement.  And the government will give it to them.  And they will vote for the president no matter what.”–Romney said in the recording.

So basically all he did was call attention to the elephant in the room.  The fact that entitlement spending and the amount of people on government aid is growing is a huge problem, and one which cannot be sustained over the long term.  Eventually the economy has to bust completely, and there are going to be riots just like there were in jolly old England.  Also, those people will never vote for Romney, they will vote for the man who is more likely to give them free stuff, which is Obama.  But putting that aside, there is a large constituency for the Dems that can never be won by any Republican no matter what.  The Republicans need to realize that and just put up real conservative candidates from now on, not more neo-cons. 

Of course Obama’s response about how he is everyone’s president is asinine, and it is probably the biggest lie since the snake told Eve it was OK eat the forbidden fruit, or at least one of them.  The fact is Obama represents and caters to his constituency.  If he were my president then he would have less time to appear on irrelevant shows like “David Letterman” and “The View” and more time to meet with Netanyahu.  He would also never have passed NDAA.  He would also not continually suck up to Islam, and he would not call that child molesting bastard who started Islam a prophet.  Those are just a few things.  No, he’s the candidate for an entirely different group of people which I am not at all by any means a part of.

Welfare Mom:

Cindy Nerger, 28, who relies on food stamps to feed her family, said she was brought to tears after being embarrassed by a manager at a Kroger store in Warner Robbins, Ga.

“He said, ‘Excuse me for working for a living and not relying on food stamps like you,’” Nerger said the manager told her.

The man’s comment came after Nerger and two other store employees disagreed over whether her total purchase was eligible for food stamps – the employees had insisted that roughly $10 of her bill was not covered. She said the manager ultimately told the employees to “just give it to her.”

After Nerger then stressed that she had been right all along, the man made his “working for a living” remark, she said.

Source: http://gma.yahoo.com/slammed-using-food-stamps-ga-woman-seeks-apology-121005811–abc-news-savings-and-investment.html

It’s no coincidence that an article would come out about someone on government aid after Romney’s comment, and in light of the smear campaign the liberal media is running against him for free.  The article is about a 28 year old woman who is married and who has a daughter, but is also on foodstamps.  The purpose of the article is to make people pity people those who live off the government and to make Romney look as though he is mean or spiteful, because he wants to cut funding to people like this, supposedly. 

To that end, it’s worth noting that they picked a white female who suffers from a medical condition, and who is actually married.  They did not want to pick a stereotypical welfare-mom or someone who looks like they could be an immigrant. 

Nerger said the reason she and her family – she is married with a daughter – must rely on food stamps is because her husband’s carpentry business isn’t profitable enough to support the family.

Meanwhile, Nerger must devote 12 hours every night to a dialysis treatment to combat her kidney disease, which she’s struggled with since the age of 11. She’s been on a kidney transplant list for five years and hopes that someday, after a successful transplant, she can become a working member of society. She would like to attend college to major in child psychology.

If they picked a healthy woman who was unmarried and knocked up then there would be a good deal less sympathy.  The sad thing is that many unthoughtful people will be taken in by this, and an article like this will actually influence the outcome of the election, even if only by a small degree.  But let us be analytical.

Here is the woman with her child:

Even though the picture is carefully angled (a tactic which fat women often use when they post pictures online), and no doubt carefully chosen, it is still easy to tell that this woman is considerably overweight, probably obese, which is consistent with what I have seen of women on foodstamps and WIC (more on that shortly).  The fact is that whether her need is serious or not, she has managed to get very fat, which indicated excess.  If she’s really hard up for money she should eat smaller portions and share with her daughter. 

Second, knowing that they were not doing well financially she should never have had a child.  Wait until you can afford a kid then have one.  If you can’t feed them don’t breed them.  Seriously.  If we are going to have welfare then the government should make abstinance or sterilization a pre-requisite for receiving aid.  Otherwise a large dependent class is bred which just drains the productive sectors of society.  Part of the reason the number of people living off the tit has grown so much is because the government pays them to breed.  If you incentivise a behavior you will get more of it.

My third point about this couple, is that if her husband’s business is not taking off, then it’s time to do something else.  The manager at the grocery store is managing to get by, maybe this guy should go and do that.  It’s negligent of this man to keep waiting for this thing to take off IF he cannot afford to feed his family. 

The medical condition she has is unfortunate, but this woman is still fat, she still had a child, and her husband is still not doing his job to support them.

Of course judging by the picture of this person it is hard for me to believe that that is the case.  In fact, getting back to what I said earlier, obecity is quite common among those who rely on foodstamps and WIC.  I know this from first hand experience because I spent a summer working at a grocery store as a cashier back when I was in my teens, and yes, I know it was only one summer, but so many of these people came in.  I averaged at about three or four a day.  Most of them were fat, some of them were grossly obese.  What they would do is have a handful of bare essential items which they would use their foodstamps or WIC to buy, because only certain items can be bought with those programs, then there would be a basket stuffed full of food that they would by with their own money.  So if the were responsible they would buy the small handful of essential items with their own money in place of some of that other junk, and get off the government tit.  I saw only one woman on WIC who was actually thin, and I saw only a handful of food stamp recipients who were, and they were all in the same family.  The family was from some country in Eastern Europe, or maybe Russia, but as foreigners and immigrants they should not even be elligible for foodstamps or any kind of government assistance.

So the issue is not whether Romney is mean, or how bad the situations of government recipients might be, but the issue at hand is deciding what the role of government is, and whether the government is a government or a charity.  The left insists that poverty can be solved by throwing more money at it, but in the meantime we just end up with more poverty, which goes back to my comment about incentivising behaviors.  If you incentivise a particular behavior or lifestyle then you will get more of it.  To me, all the left wing talk about “helping the poor” rings hollow, because the traditional means for supporting the down and out are religious organizations and family, which are two institutions the left is continually attacking and trying to undermine. 

If someone was struggling in the 1800′s, or the early 1900′s they could count on their families for help.  Women could count on their husbands, and young women were not usually having children outside of wedlock, they were having children with their husbands and staying with them.  Widows could also count on their families for help, because usually they had children, or if they were young enough they could remarry and get help from their parents in the meantime.  If none of those factors applied, the widows could still get help from their church.  This whole concept of government feeding people is relatively new.  Traditionally when it came to food the government usually took it away from people, or let them keep it at most, but never have we had a situation prior to the 1900′s where a government tried to be everyone’s sugar momma.

I am firmly convinced that the left wing leadership, and some of the left wing followers as well, want to create a permanent underclass so that they can have a reliable voter-base that will come out for them every election. 

This is exactly why I dislike nature worship, and one of the reasons why I dislike globalists.  The arrogance and wickedness of these people is beyond words.  So they know what the effects of this garbage is (cancer and sterility) but they push it through anyways because they think the Earth is overpopulated and the population needs to be reduced.  I have news for all these globalist parasites, the Earth is NOT overpopulated.  Some parts of it are, but that’s not an “Earth” problem it’s a problem that exists in 3rd world countries, like India and China.  That being said, I have been to India and their food is entirely organic and fresh.  The farmers literally grow the plants and animals just outside of town (and inside), and then they bring it to the market where you can by them directly.  India is very crowded, and yet, they don’t have to resort to mass production of genetically engineered food in order to feed everyone, AND the cost of food in terms of real wages is much lower there than it is here.  So the argument about NEEDING genetically engineered food to feed everyone can best be described as a seditious lie, a.k.a. bullcrap.

But this is the mentality of the globalists behind the NWO.  They have decided that they are better than everyone else, for whatever reason, and so they should receive one kind of treatment while most of the rest of humanity is treated like cattle.  They think the are a superior breed of people, and they want to be in charge of us.  It’s the same mentality behind the Democrats forcing through Obamacare while exempting themselves from it.  The globalist agenda is clearly spelled out on the Guide Stones found near Elberton Georgia:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

2. Guide reproduction wisely—improving fitness and diversity.

3. Unite humanity with a living new language.

4. Rule Passion—Faith—Tradition—and all things with tempered reason.

5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

8. Balance personal rights with social duties.

9. Prize truth—beauty—love—seeking harmony with the infinite.

10. Be not a cancer on the earth—Leave room for nature—Leave room for nature.

Source: http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/2002/carl-teichrib/guidestones.htm

To me they are a bunch of wackjob nature worshippers.  Of course to me the whole concept of nature worship is thoroughly idiotic, but people should have the freedom to do that if that is what they wish.  Freedom of religion.  However, what makes these people so odious is that they want force the entire world to lineup with their agenda, and what makes them dangerous is that they have the power to do it.  So many of them are in places of power. 

The Earth is a created thing, like a car or a house, and while we may appreciate our car or house I see no reason to treat them as higher beings, when they are not even beings of any sort.  The Earth is dead in the long run regardless of whether or not it is “overpopulated.”  The Bible says that the Earth will be destroyed with a “fervent heat” and science has confirmed this as the sun must eventually go supernova.  I’m not saying that we should trash it out (actually I hate it when people litter), because for the time being we have to live here, but I am saying that saving humanity is more important than “saving the Earth” because there are other planets we can go to if Earth gets destroyed.  But if humanity gets destroyed then the Earth becomes pointless. 

But back to these globalist population control pricks.  What it really comes down to is they think they are better than everyone else, so they want to literally reduce the rest of humanity to a lesser state of being.  They want to have their space and cush lifestyles, while we all live in a backward feudal state with no freedoms.  It’s like they bastardized their ideology by lifting the worst elements from Lord Shang, Karl Marx, and 1984, and blending them together into one vile abomination.

If they want space, they should invest their money in space exploration so that they can colonize some other planet, have all the space they need, and NEVER COME BACK.  But no, they won’t do that because:

1) They have no real morals

2) They want to have slaves

3) That would take too much effort and requires real ingenuity. 

This was a comment I came across left by a yahoo user on a news article about Obama.  The user has hidden their real name.  I did not write this myself, but it is a good thing for anyone to read when we consider that we could have four more years of this man:

Quit trashing President Obama’s accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. He has an impressive list of accomplishments:

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the Unit ed States

First President to violate the War Powers Act. .

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico .
First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on ‘shovel-ready’ jobs when there was no such thing as ‘shovel-ready’ jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S. , including those with criminal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.

First President to terminate America ‘s ability to put a man in space.

First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).

First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-Corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.

First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 102 to date.

First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to go on multiple global “apology tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.

First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayer.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat the Holy Quran & tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences”.
Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).

How is this hope and change working out for you? THERE’S AN ELECTION COMING UP…I HOPE YOU REMEMBER THIS LIST WHEN YOU VOTE!

Although Sun Tzu said never to allow your enemies to see your emotions (which in my case would be the left), I am going to go out on a limb here discuss mine because I believe that in this case it will do more good than harm.  I have been extremely demoralized for the last few weeks regarding the next election. 

Contrary to the stereotypes liberals have about conservatives, I actually do not watch Fox News, and I very seldom listen to talk radio.  I actually get most of my news from Yahoo, which has it’s own team of journalists but also takes articles from sources such as the NYT, Associated Press, CNN, ABC, and Time.  All of which of course are 100% liberal, as is the Yahoo team.  Contrary to what liberals think, true conservatives who read he libral media will only become more incensed and cling to ther own side as a reaction.  This is why some conservatives choose to follow only conservative sources, such as there are, because they no longer have patience for left wing news/propaganda.  But I digress.

The point is I was reading the left wing news, and it demoralized me.  They were putting out articles predicting wins for Obama, and showing how he was more popular and more well liked than Romney among a vareity of groups, and in general.  Then I saw an article about how Eric Holder was acquitted and I just tossed up my hands in frustration and exasperation.

I said, “We don’t have a country any more, this is it.”  I lost my will to struggle, and I considered never voting again.  It reminded me of a wrestling match I had years ago with one of my friends.  When I was younger I used to wrestle, and I was fairly decent at it.  When I wrestled with this guy I usually beat him, because I was better trained and physically stronger, but one day I was feeling particularly tired physically, and I was also depressed about something (probably job related).  The result was that I did not have the energy to defeat him, but I was still struggling and using such energy as I had. 

It was not long before he had an arm around my neck and was constricting my air flow.  I could not get away, and the more I struggled the harder he constricted, and it became progressively more difficult to struggle because as I exerted myself my need for oxygen rose but my ability to get it diminished.  So I just gave up and let him strangle me.  I figure whatever happened would happen, and I had no energy or will power left. My memory of what exacty happened is hazy, but basically what happened was I nearly lost consciousness and went limp, and my friend ended up loosening his grip so I was able to get free.  Obviously I didn’t die because I’m here now.

But that pretty much described my feelings for much of the week.  I thought that perhaps we should just give up and stop fighting the liberals since they are going to win anyways.  I figured that it was time to hunker down, isolate ourselves as much as possible, and wait for the blow to fall.  Then when it does fall we could at least make sure the nail is upside down so that they will strike down on a point rather than a dull flat head.  Anyone who is a conservative will know what I mean by that. 

I was thinking these things, but then an idea occured to me.  This is how the left wants us to feel.  They want us to think it’s hopeless so that we will stay out of politics and let them run wild.  They are still afraid of us, which means that we still have some power.  I am thinking that their articles are bogus when they talk about how most of the people in the country are pro-Obama.  All one needs to do is look at the comments beneath the articles to see the overwhelming hostility the readers feel towards Obama and his party. 

However, Yahoo is right about one thing.  Most of us are not excited about Romney, and most of us do not relate to him.  Of course, their theories on why that is and what the results will be are wrong.  We don’t have difficulty relating to the Republicans because they are “rich” and we are classist, and our lack of ability to relate to them will not stop us from voting.  We don’t relate to Romney and many of the Republicans because they do not embody our values.  A far as the religious right is concerned, they do not share our values and beliefs, but they are still closer to us than the Democrats, which most of us firmly believe is the party of Satan.  Most of us on the right in general (secular or religious) are not impressed with their economic policies, which will still not roll back the debt, or their commitment and ability to turn back the disastrous changes made by Obama and his lackeys.  That being said, many of us will still vote just because we want Obama gone.

I will admit, there are good arguments on both sides for voting and for not voting, but for my part I have decided I will vote.  Here is why: Immigration.

If we do not do something to stem the tide of immigration from Mexico and other 3rd world countries then we will not have a country left.  I have seen lots of articles online where the liberal media is whining about Republican attempts to curtail immigration from Mexico, and to require voters to show some type of government picture ID.  Of course we know that part of the reason they are complaining is because they like to receive votes from illegal aliens, but they also want to ensure that Mexicans and other 3rd world immigrants continue to vote because they typically vote Democrat.  That is also part of the reason why they continually fight against efforts to curtail immigration from Mexico and deport illegals.

According to this liberal news article I read two out of every three “Latinos” votes for the Democrats.

That means that as their numbers continue to grow it will become progressively more difficult for Republicans to win.  Furthermore, if Obama wins again and maintains the majority in the Senate, we can expect them to fling open the borders for more immigration.  Once they get enough Mexicans in the US, they will no longer have any need to appeal Independants or fence sitters. 

The article mentions that Republicans might try to appeal to Mexicans on the grounds that they are morally conservative, but I believe that they will fail in that regard.  Mexicans may be anti-gay and anti-abortion, but 70% of documented Mexican immigrants are on welfare.  In other words, the majority of them come here to suck on the tit.  It also means that a large portion of their population is incapable of nation-building.  All one needs to do to see this illustrated is to look at the sorry shape their own country is in.  If enough of them come here then the US will just be another Mexico, pollution, crowding, poor education, and all. 

I’m really serious guys.  If we don’t get out and vote for the Republicans, then whatever ideological point we are trying to make by not voting will bear no fruits as we will never be able to get in another Republican no matter how much they reform.  We will become a persecuted and hated minority in our own country.  At that point our votes will truly be irrelevant, and the only thing left for us to do will be to either flee the country that our ancestors created, or to hunker down and flip the nail over.  Think about it.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/latino-population-growth-could-impact-iowa-180859929–election.html?bcmt=1347654143059-a958ae71-bf4d-4cc5-bc50-1fbe6178d814&bcmt_s=u#ugccmt-container-b

China is probably the best example of succesful brainwashing on a mass scale.  At present the people there are protesting against Japan on a mass scale over a tiny group of islands.  The islands are actually Japanese territory, but the Japanese government has officially bought them from a private owner recently, and this has inflamed people in China, including the Chinese government.

I have one question.  What is the use of the islands?  Because the article I read described them as small rocky outcroppings.  My guess is that it has more to do with control over a swath of the ocean than any pragmatic use the islands themselves might have. 

There are protests in China around the Japanese embassy, and some of them spilled over to the US embassy where the car of our ambassador was damaged.  The protestors are saying that this reminds them of the time when Japan invaded Manchuria, which was highly offensive to the Chinese people, even though the native Manchurians are in fact NOT Chinese themselves.  Manchuria was a different nation, like Tibet, which China annexed at some point.

“On Tuesday the dispute mixed with remembrances of a 1931 incident that Japan used as a pretext to invade Manchuria, setting off a brutal occupation of China that ended only at the close of World War II. China marks every Sept. 18 by blowing sirens, but demonstrations such as those seen Tuesday are not routine.”

http://news.yahoo.com/beijing-demonstrators-damage-us-ambassadors-car-012025364.html

Seriously?  They are still doing this every month since the war?  There is no reason for people in China today to be angry at Japan.  All of those Japanese war criminals from WWII are dead, and the people alive today had nothing to do with what happened back then.  This is just as foolish as the black Americans who are still complaining about slavery as if it were part of their life, even though it ended over 100 years ago.  You cannot hold people responsible for something that their ancestors MIGHT have done in the past.  No one can help what people group they are born into, it’s just a circumstance.  Japanese people don’t wake up and think, “Hmm, how can we screw over Chinese people today?” 

The biggest imperialist nation in the far east today is China, which is not only geographically the largest, but which has taken Manchuria, Tibet, part of Mongolia, and a variety of Turkic groups to the west.  When a country invades other countries and integrates them into it’s authority structure that is called imperialism.

That being said, the whole reason why the Chinese government allows these protests, and why they blow sirens every day, is because they have a vested interest in directing the people’s anger toward Japan.  Why?  Because this is a typical tactic that the left uses in any part of the world.  They like to get people upset at someone other than them, so they keep bringing up things that happened in the past in order to keep them fresh.  It’s nothing but a distraction from the real villain and opresser, which is the left wing government. They dupe people into blaming their bad circumstances on something other than the real culprit. 

So it turns out that there was no Israeli man involved in the making of “Innocence of Muslims,” it was an Egyptian man named Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.  Right now it looks like the man is going to be punished for making his movie.

Of course, officially he is not going to be punished for the movie, but for crimes of fraud and violation of probation, but let’s be real, if he had not made that movie no one would care about him one way or another.  This is just Obama’s attempt to appease our enemies on some level.  I spit on this man Obama.  He is the most vile disgusting fiend ever to occupy office in our country.  If he loves our enemies so bloody much then he should leave us and go live with them in their tents and drink camel piss right alongside them.  He can go suck eggs in Afghanistan or Sudan, with his buddies, and leave American alone.

Seriously.  Immediately after they find out who was behind the movie we start hearing news of investigations and taking this man to trial.  Whatever trial happens is probably going to be a show trail, with the punishment already in mind from the beginning.  Obama is looking to censor this man, just as he has already leaned on youtube to censor the video around the world.  Youtube has complied part way and censored the movie in some countries.

Also, I don’t care for how the media has been handling this.  First of all, releasing this man’s name is way out of line, especially given what we have observed about the Islamic tendency to kill people for things like this and place bounties on their heads, and given that we know they already want to kill him. Second, I want to know why every time they mention Muhammad in the news they call him “the prophet Muhammad.”

HE IS NOT A PROPHET! I thought the news media was run by atheists and agnostics. Atheists and agnostics should not be calling anyone a prophet because they don’t believe in the existence of such things. The only reason they would be doing that is if they were shameless brown-nosers. I want to know who the shameless brown nosing oikophobes are who gave orders to all the media goons to refer to that cursed child molesting polymorphously perveted bastard as a prophet? Let me know who these people are and I will put their pictures and names up all over the internet.

Seriously, if we are going to refer to that heathen devil worshipping monster then I am going to insist that every time Jesus is mentioned we refer to him as Jesus Christ, Son of God. I insist. It’s only fair and balance.

I think I’m going to be sick.

Anyways, my sympathies are with Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who did nothing wrong in making that movie which shows Muslims and Muhammad for being EXACTLY what they are. 

Here is a clip:

One of my best friends is from the Netherlands.  He immigrated to the US some time ago and has decided to stay because we have more space and freedom here, but he gave me a suggestion on how we should treat Muslims based on how they treat others.  By others I mean both the native Christians and other religious minorities in their countries, and how they treat their hosts when they immigrate.  So here is one possible solution to Islam which could ameliorate it’s effects on our societies.

Put Muslims under Sharia, and by that I don’t mean their own moon worshipping rapist Sharia, I mean taking their ideas and applying it to them.  At least, those of them who live in our countries.  So here it goes:

1) Muslims will not be allowed to build new mosques.

2) Muslims will not be allowed to make the call to prayer or do anything that causes noise publicly.

3) Muslims will not be allowed to repair damage to any existing mosques, or expand the size of their facilities without our permission.  Even if they get damaged by a disaster or by some of our people, they still cannot fix it without our permission.

4) Muslims who want to remain practicing Muslims will have to pay a Jizya tax.  Failure to pay the Jizya tax means that they will have to change their religion or get out.  Of course infidels living under Islam would have to change their religion or die, but I’m cutting them a little break here.

5) They will be under no circumstances allowed to marry, date, or have sex with any of our women, but we can have whatever relations we want with their women. 

6) They will not be allowed to say anything against Christianity or any of the other major religions practiced in our countries without facing legal actions.  In their countries speaking out against Islam would be death, but again, I’m showing a little mercy here.

7) They will not be allowed to buy land from us, and if one of us buys land from them then the land can no longer be resold or returned to Muslim ownership.

8) If a Muslims changes their religion and decides that they want to change it back then they will not be allowed to, unless they want to be deported.

I think that’s all quite fair yes?  It is considerably softer than the way they treat religious and ethnic minorities in their own countries.  I have even waived off of the death penalty for 4, 6, and 8. 

If we put these policies into place then not only would the Muslims who are already here cause less trouble for us, but more of them would be discouraged from coming here.

Or, to save time we could just deport all the Muslims now.  We could rescue all the Coptic Christians and other religious minorities from the Middle East and bring them to the US.  Then we could take all of the Muslims from the US and Europe and drop them all back in their homelands.  That would be a winning scenario for both side.  Not only would we be free of the Muslims, but they would also be free of us.  They could have their pure Islamic paradise, and establish whatever “civilization” they wanted. 

Since I have already ranted about this to friends and family, I believe I can have a calm(er) discussion about it here.  Anyone following the news lately may have noticed that the Muslims have attacked our embassies in Libya, Egypt, and Yemen. 

The embassies in Libya and Egypt were attacked on 9/11, of all times to attack us.  In Libya they killed our ambassador and three of his aids.  Under normal circumstances such things would be an act of war, but we have a wonderful globalist and socialist Democrat in charge of the country, so apologizing to our enemies takes precedence over retribution.  Of course this is not the first time a thing like this happened. After the Islamic revolution in Iran our wonderful Democrat president at the time, Jimmy Carter, also did nothing, and it ended up costing him an election.  I hope the same will happen for that treacherous empty suite Obama.  Honestly, Kim Kardashian would make a better president than that blundering dolt.

That being said, yesterday I called one of my friends to vent, and he was not paying attention to the news so he didn’t hear what happened.  When I told him he said, “But we helped Libya and Egypt, why are they attacking us?”  It brought to mind the story of the coyote and the rattlesnake.

Once upon a time there was a coyote who went down to get a drink of water from a river and to cross it.  As he stood by the river he noticed a rattlesnake. The rattlesnake asked the coyote if he could carry him on his back as he swam across the river, but the coyote was hesitant.

“You will bite me,” the coyote said.

“I promise I won’t bite,” the rattlesnake said.

So the coyote (white liberals) felt sorry for the rattlesnake (Muslims) being stuck and agreed to carry him across the river.  Then, as they were halfway across the river the rattlesnake bit the coyote.

The coyote said, “Why did you do that?  Now we are both going to die.”

The rattlesnake said, “It’s my nature.”

So what I told my friend is that they do not care that we helped them.  We are infidels, which means that they owe us nothing no matter what we do.  People who spend time thinking about why they attacked us and why they hate us are wasting their time.  They hate us because we are not them, and they attacked us because that is what Muhammad told them to do.  It’s really quite simple, but it boggles the mind of most people because most people don’t think that way. 

Islam is what makes those people into savages.  If it were not for Islam they would be regular human beings, instead of insane necromongers.  They would probably be like Eastern Europeans, Indians, or Asians (depending on where they are from).  Instead they are a bunch of raving lunatics with an average IQ of 80. 

Supposedly the Muslims are enraged (this time) over a movie called “Innocence of Muslims,” which they claim mocked Islam.  I maintain that it just showed their dirty “prophet” for what he is, but even if they did mock him, that is no excuse for attacking and killing people, and killing a foreign ambassador IS an act of war, regardless of how badly our idiot in chief wants to sit on his hands. 

First of all, this is America, we have freedom of speech here.  That means that even if something is offensive you don’t get to run off and kill them.  Muslims are saying that we should punish the people who made the movie, but that’s not how it works.  They can make whatever movie they want with their own movie.  Also, Christians continually get made fun of by the entertainment industry and educators, but you don’t see us going on a killing spree over it, and you certainly do not see Muslims complaining about that or trying to come to our aid.  Similarly why should we want to go and defend their religion?  Why do we care?

There are many Muslims who think that their religion is self evident, and that everyone who does not follow it is in rebellion but secretly knows that it’s true.  That is simply idiotic, and certainly not the case.  To Christians is Islam is heresy.  At best some of us view it as just another pagan religion, but I tend to view it as a savage death cult which is more of a political ideology than a religion.  Under the best of circumstances I could not care less if someone makes fun of Islam.  Why should I care?  It’s not my religion so they aren’t insulting me.

Second, the people who made that movie were not even Americans.  One was an Israeli expat and the other was from Egypt.

Third, the people they killed in the embassy had nothing to do with making the movie.  Again, we have freedom of speech in the US.  If you don’t like it, don’t come here, but don’t throw a fit just because you can’t control what people do in other countries. Savages. 

But the truth is, it doesn’t matter where they were from or where they made the movie.  You don’t have the right to kill someone just because you don’t like what they said.  If your religion is so weak that the only way you can defend it is with violence then that means you have no real logical argument for your religion, which means your religion is probably false.  They were talking about defending their child banging prophet, but last time I checked Muhammad was dead.  What are they defending him from?  He’s already dead.  If they are talking about defending their religion then that’s fine, and they have the right to do that, but killing people for disagreeing with you does not in any way refute whatever they said.  Again, Muslims have a savage and backwards way of thinking.

As the men attacked our embassy in Libya one of the things they shouted was “we are all Osama,” and they did this on 9/11.  Really?  If that is the case then they all need to die.  Plain and simple.

Part of the reason this is happening is because the whole world knows we have a milksop in charge of the country who will not do anything, and whose loyalties are elsewhere.  In fact, out wonderful government has already issued an apology to the Muslims for this movie, and still they attack us.  This would not be happening if we still had Bush.  When we had Bush, they attacked two of our buildings and as a result we blew up two of their countries.  But this fool Obama will do nothing because his sympathies are with our enemies rather than us.  Anyone who votes for Obama in the next election hates America, plain and simple.  Everyone should see this man for what he is now.

This is Islam:

They are open about their goals.  It’s time we did something about it. 

So a guy walks into Hooters with his girlfriend…

I know, I know…  Anyone reading that is going to think I’m setting up a joke, but this is something that really happened.

A guy walks into Hooters with his girlfriend and they sit down to order some food.  They observe some of the workers laughing in a corner, and when they are given their receipt it says “Chinx” in the section for the customers name.

The couple was Korean, and in this case they were true Koreans/immigrants from Korea, not people born in the US.  They were so shocked/enraged by the receipt that they apparently lost their appetite, and are now involved in a lawsuit against Hooters.

The management of Hooters has already fired the young lady who rang them up, and they have already apologized for the insult.  So why is the lawsuit necessary, and on what grounds will the case be predicated?

I realize that people on the left would like to have racism made into a prosecutable legal offense, but the most important freedoms that makes our country worth living in is freedom of speech.  Freedom of speech means that people can express their views, thoughts, and opinions even if they hurt someone else’s feelings.  Usually the left will say, “Yes, we like freedom of speech but there is such a thing as being responsible.”  Yes there is, and that means owning the consequences of your actions, not having your freedom of choice taken away.  This girl has already paid for her actions, and she probably has learned a lesson from it.  Any worker who insults any customer for any reason is bad for business.

“Well don’t you think things would be better if people couldn’t say racist things?” a liberal might ask.  No, absolutely not.  Shackling people’s mouths means more suffering.  I would rather risk getting my feelings hurt, than facing legal actions such as paying fines, going to jail, or being blacklisted.  My freedom is more important than my feelings.  I will get over hurt feelings, or say something snarky in return if I am really offended, but it’s not so easy to shrug off getting arrested.

“Don’t say anything racist.”

How about you just don’t get your feelings hurt, or when it happens you handle it like a grownup?  What consitutes “racist” is often subjective, just like the Salem witch trials.

A smart judge will throw out this case and tell them to grow up.  Even with NDAA and all the other insanity going on I don’t think this case will go anywhere.  There is just nothing here to build a case on.  It would be one thing if they were seeking employment and were discriminated against based on their race, but being called any kind of racial slur is not a crime.

To be fair, Asians in the US probably receive one of the highest levels of racism.  The reason I say this is that they are not as protected by the PC mob as other groups do to their high level of achievement.  In addition, most people are not scared of Asians.  If it were a black couple I doubt anyone would have put “nigs” or anything on their receipt, because the fact is that most people are scared of black people.  I’m not trying to insult anyone here, just being real. 

Also, I’m thinking that even if the judge is a liberal the case will be dismissed because the cashier who drafted the receipt was black…

…unless someone else was logged in using Shenika’s account.  Because according to left wing intellectuals only white people can be racist, so in this case it would have to be written off as a typo on Shenika’s part.

But in all seriousness, my guess is that this couple just has yet to acclimate to the US and understand the laws.  Obviously they don’t get what’s going on or they never would have gone on a date to Hooters.  The fact that they would go there as a couple is a clear indication that some neurons aren’t firing properly.  Seriously.  Hooters?  What kind of an idiot takes his girlfriend to Hooters, and what kind of woman is OK with that?  Maybe a lot of men are going to Hooters for the breasts and thighs, but not the chicken.  Come on. 

That’s all I have to say on this. 

Source: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/12/13831316-korean-american-man-sues-queens-hooters-over-racial-slur-on-receipt?lite

Since it is 9/11, I want us to take a moment to reflect on who our friends are, who are enemies are, and how important freedom is.

On 9/11 we were dealt an unprovoked attack by Islam which took us to war.  In 1941 we were dealt an unprovoked attack by Japan, but there was one very important difference.  The government of Japan had a tactical reason for attacking us while the Muslim attack was purely ideological.  It has been said that they attacked us for our freedom, and that is absolutely true.  Muslim societies are notoriously unfree, and the more Islamic they are the less free they are.  Under Islam there is no freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of dress, or freedom of diet.  Treatment of women is terrible.  If a woman gets raped then she is blamed for it, and if a husband wants to divorce his wife he can for any reason.  Non-believers are either killed or treated as second class citizens.

This is Islam:

Can anyone in their right mind honestly say that they would like to live under that sort of society?  Also notice the similarities in mannerisms and appearance between Hamas and Hizballah to the KKK and Nazis.  Similar motivations must at some point produce similar manifestations, even among different people groups.  Whether it is Islam or classic Nazism, we are still dealing with groups who believe that everyone is inferior to them, who want to take over the world, and who believe it is their right to do so by any means necessary.  I want to be very clear on this, Islam is the Nazism of today.  Just like the Nazis of WWII, they wage war on free countries, and in their own countries they kill and imprison people for disagreeing with their beliefs.  Like the Nazis, they do not really need any reason to attack us other than the fact that we are not them.  So no, we did not do anything to cause the attack on 9/11.

9.123 “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you”

9.73 “O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.”

So I say never forget 9/11, but also never forget what Islam is all about.

That being said, let’s take a lesson from our enemies, and remember that what they have is exactly what we don’t want here.  During the Cold War “In God we trust” was put on our money to further accentuate the ideological contrast between us and the unfree Soviets who trusted in big government and worshipped it as God.  It may seem like a small thing, but things like that are a sign of a healthy society, meaning that we recognize the difference between us and our enemies and rather than become like them we renounce them and make an effort to stay free.  I am not seeing so much of that with this ongoing war.  What I am seeing is the Patriot Act, and NDAA, which have put us in the same situation where our government can nab people off the streets and detain them without trial for speaking out.  If our government is going to become like our enemies then what good is their protection?

Also let us not forget who our friends are.  There is one country in the Middle East which has always been on our side, one country where people did not cheer in the streets when the Muslims attacked us.  Of course I am talking about Israel.  Israel has been a loyal ally in spite of how some of our presidents have given them the shaft.  What we need is more Israel and less Islam.  Of course Obama has turned his back on Israel out of preference for our enemies, but one thing that all the Christians and Jews in the US can do to support Israel is donate to them on an individual basis.  I have done this before even though I am a poor guy with very little money to spare.  If we all do it then it can make a huge difference for Israel and the Middle East.

That is all I have to say on this for now.