Tuesday, 16 October 2012
-
We are severely and hopelessly jacked if Obama wins
According to the polls I have been seeing it looks like this is going to be a close race. To me it's unbelievable that this can even be close. It's simply unbelievable. Obama is he greatest human disaster ever to hit the US. I'm going to break this down as simple as possible.
Are you better off after four years of Obama? Think about it:
I know I'm not. I'm earning about $5000 less in net income than I was in 2007 and I don't have medical. But forget about me. Are things better overall after four years of Obama? Is anyone better off after four years? Given the facts I don't see how anyone can want for more years of this man.
I used to think that Obama was the greatest stumbling dolt ever to go into politics in the US and possibly in the world, but lately I have come to see him as a saboteur. This man is doing everything he can to damage and weaken the US.
John P. Holdren, the director for the White House Office of Science and Technology has stated on the record that he wants to de-devlop America.
“A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States,” Holdren wrote along with Paul and Anne H. Ehrlich in the “recommendations” concluding their 1973 book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.
These people are thoroughly contemptuous of the United States. Listen, one of the first things Obama did after he got elected was cancel the Constellation program. This goes to show where science, progress, and the future of the United States fits on his priority list. He has thwarted every attempt to gain energy independence. He cuts our military while giving aid to our enemies. To support this man you must either hate America or you must be wilfully woefully ignorant. There is no other option, it's either one or the other.
I am not an evolutionist, but if Obama wins I am going to become a supporter of Eugenics. If Obama wins this time after four years of this garbage then a strong and profound case is made for Eugenics. There is no way around that. The fact is this man, like every other left wing totalitarian tyrant, requires masses of stupid people to flourish. That is not anything new. Emperor Chin, the first Emperor of unified China, also relied heavily on mass ignorance. He was one of the first autocrats, possibly the first, to carry out both a book burning and a purge of scholars. He did it because he had an advisor who told him that intelligent people are more likely to rebel against totalitarian rulers. If you ever read the book of Lord Shang you can see how it is essentially the BC version of "1984" in terms of MO and reccomendations.
But purges of intelligent people and limiting access to knowledge are common all throughout history. They did it in China, they did it in the USSR, they did it in Cambodia, they did it in North Korea. There are two ways of doing it, one is to kill people out right, and another way is to use dysgenics.
Lisen, I'm not trying to be condescending here, but this is an important message that everyone needs to understand. The purpose of welfare is not to help anyone, it is nothing more than a two pronged attack on America. There are generations of people on welfare, and rather than breaking out of poverty they stay in it for generations and multiply. If you incentivise a behavior you will get more of it. Incentivise success and you get more success, incentivise failure and you get more failure. The Democrats use welfare to both buy votes and to increase the numbers in that particular voting bloc. They also bring in masses of unskilled workers from 3rd world countries to increase their voting bloc. The result is a net increase in unintelligent or less intelligent voters. Again, I'm not trying to be condescending but I cannot think of any gentle way of putting this. If Obama wins the case for Eugenics is made. It's made.
Anyone who is older than me and even semi-aware will say that the ideological difference between Republicans and Democats has grown into a yawning chasm. The difference did not used to be so profound, ever in history, and this is taking into account the fact that the Republican party has been appropriated by neo-cons. Why is this happening?
I was born in 1981, and since then I have noticed a vast change both in the ideological separation of the parties and their constituincies, and the campaign methods used, as well as campaign methodologies. Obamaphone!? "Wake the f*** up!"? Get serious. What is this? Middle school? I have never seen such a vast bloc of ignorant and dependence minded people before. The amount of people on welfare and government assistance has skyrocketed. Back in the 80's it was about one third (still too much), and now it is nearly half. The immigration and welfare policies have really caused this bloc of people to grow between now and then. In another 30 years the US may no longer even be recognizable if these policies continue.
If Obama wins, you can probably forget about having any more elections after that. There may be elections, but if he wins he is going to cut loose without limit because it will be his second term, and he will bring in so many immigrants from Mexico that our votes simply will not be able to overcome them. If the immigration from Mexico ever slows down he will flood us with immigrants from Africa and the Islamic world. He will do it. Another four years of Obama and you may as well forget about going to the ballot after that. Forget about it, because your vote will make no difference.
Think about it.
-
recommend
- recs 6
-
email
- sent 0
- like
Related Posts
Post a Comment
- Back to Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
Comments (38)
Whoever becomes president will have become so by the will of the American people.
God does not interfere with free choice. So if Obama becomes president, not even God will help us.
@PrisonerxOfxLove - So maybe I should change the title to "we are so screwed"?
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - You have a way of grossly understating the situation.
@PrisonerxOfxLove - OK check it now.
You are a wordsmith par excellence!
I don't think our vote will make any difference anyway, because I don't really see Romney as a champion to defend the People. What I saw happen at the RNC pretty much sealed that for me. BOTH of them are/will be controlled by the same puppeteers. The America I know and love is dead. Most people just don't know it yet. I am ashamed of this generation.
@PrisonerxOfxLove - True, but He will tell you who he'd prefer if you ask.
@PrisonerxOfxLove - Haha, thanks. My fiance has told me I should go into politics. What do you think?
@mtngirlsouth - You know for a while I thought about just not voting ever again because the Republican party has gotten away from their traditional platform, but my grandparents talked me back into voting. What they said was that we aren't voting FOR Romney we are voting against Obama. If you vote for anyone other than Romney or simply don't vote at all the you're giving Obama a vote, because no one on that side is going to not vote because Obama isn't 100% of what they want. Every Muslims and most every queer is going to get out and vote for Obama. The queers don't care that Muslims are voting for Obama, and the Muslims don't care that the queers are, because at the end of the day his constituency is the constituency of darkness and decay. There is a saying in India: Whether the leaf comes to the thorn or the thorn comes to the leaf, the is still pierced. Think about it.
That being said, the way I see it is that we have the choice between socialism-lite, or heavy communism with extra mustard and mayo. Which one is going to smother us more?
@Kris0logy - Well we know which one is more in line with God's principles, but there is always the chance that God will let the other guy win in order to hasten the end of things. Anyways, I'm going to do an entry on where the US fits into prophecy soon.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - The way *I* see it is we have a choice between socialism from the red puppet or socialism from the blue puppet. As stated, America is already dead, it's just that most people don't realize it yet. The very fact that so many have laid down and accepted the notion that they will settle for choosing between the two choices that they were given and were made for them is proof enough of this fact.
The reason why the credit rating was downgraded was S&P saw the Tea Party faction in Congress blocking bipartisan efforts to bring American spending under control, not wanting to raise the debt ceiling (which had happened every single other time it had been requested) so America could pay its bills and decided that if those trends continued, America wasn't a safe bet. There was next to nothing that Obama could do to prevent that, and if you blame Obama for that then - by corollary - you must blame Bush for 9/11/01 or Clinton for the Oklahoma City bombing. The principle is the same.
What other two wars out of the three are you referring to? Iraq is finished, Afghanistan is in the closing stages of American withdrawal and there are no other troops in any other conflicts worldwide. There are no further American or even NATO involvement in Libya, the international community had abandoned Syria, and - so far - Iran is being isolated diplomatically and economically but there are no military operations there yet.
The unemployment rate is back to 7.8%, and even if you disagree with the methodology or want to use a different set of statistics, you need to compare apples to apples and not apples to oranges.
There is a lot of unfounded scaremongering in this post, especially towards the end of the post when you bring in immigration - immigration trends are shaping down, especially among Hispanics.
You also have to consider the alternative. Will Mitt Romney make the situation better, or worse? If his economic plan is implemented - the $5 trillion in tax cuts with associated loopholes closed, there will still be $1 trillion gap that will have to be filled somehow - most likely on tax increases on the middle class, which even the six Republican-leaning think-tanks admit in their analysis of the plan. Otherwise it's going to be added to the deficit and debt.
For the third year in a row, the federal budget's deficit was reduced - next years by over $2 billion dollars. Still not enough, and no where near enough to close the $1 trillion deficit that's in place, but it's still a start.
To help improve America's situation and standing, it's going to take bipartisan support, agreement, and yes, compromise, to fix the issues we're facing. Denigrating and insulting the other side, asserting unfounded half-truths to fit a certain ideology, and blocking any and all measures proposed by the other side just because that side proposed them, even if they were originally your own ideas, is self-defeating and will result in the ruin of this country far quicker than any one man possibly could work on his own.
Oh, and why the complete focus on individual social welfare? Why not as strong and vitriolic attack on corporate welfare that dominates the federal budget today?
Why is one seemingly OK, and the other is not?
I agree.
Hmm. You left some things off such as the real unenmployment. The hope is that the Presidency and the congress will go Tea Party. If some real conservatives with backbone get elerct we may be able to restore this nation to a large part of its foundation. Admittedly in DC this is hard to stay the course. This is why we need to actively pray for the election of Godly people.
From what I have seen of the American people, I think Obama will win just because they want their handouts. History (classes) would have us believe a different story. I don't know if people were different, or if this is just more lies to garner patriotism and willingness to be cannon fodder. Perhaps it was a simple matter of leeches dying and/or not being able to leech. I really don't know.
I'm young. Ish. I was born in 1990. Perhaps my view of the Democratic party was inaccurate as a child, but it seems like they've become very anti-responsibility over the past few years. Perhaps it started while Bush was in office? Maybe before, but I don't believe it was always that way, as I know the type of people my parents are and I know they used to be registered Democrats.
As far as an annual budget, it's a joke anyway. Obviously. Or we wouldn't have been so in debt to begin with. The government would budget deficit and then couldn't even stay within the budget, from what I've been told.
You sound a little paranoid. Having said that, I did tell my husband the other day, "I'd rather be paranoid than live in North Korea". We were discussing the government and politics when I said it, even.
Regarding one of your comments, please don't imply that everyone who is gay only cares about that one issue. It's simply not true. There are two 'major' groups that I have heard of that are 'gays for Romney' or whatever. Even if they want to be able to get married, it's certainly not unreasonable for them to feel there are bigger things at stake here.
@cmdr_keen - If Obama was serious about cutting the deficit then he would cut spending. He could start by cutting aid to countries like Pukistan, and Egypt. The fact is he has done nothing but escalate spending, and raising the debt cieling is not a solution. You don't borrow your way out of debt. He could also slash social spending, especially entitlement spending, but won't. Why? Reasons are mentioned in my journal entry.
We are still in Iraq and Afghanistan. I haven't heard anything about Libya in a while, but we'll see what happens there.
Where do you get the idea that employment is under 8%? Even the liberal media isn't saying that, but you also have to keep in mind that the way those statistics are gathered sometimes also excludes people who have given up looking for work.
Under Mitt Romney things can begin to recover because more economic opportunities will exist. Have you ever played any of the Sim City games? You know what happens when you raise taxes in the games? I do because I have played 3 of those games and experimented all around with tax rates. When you raise the taxes you get some increased revenue for a short time, but then it drops off and pretty soon you end up losing revenue and going into deficit spending just to keep your city running. So there is a limit to how much you can raise taxes before you end up with diminishing returns. Why? Because businesses shut down and people leave. Of course under Barack Osama's plans probably many of the big corporations which you guys hate will still survive, but many of the small businesses are going to bite the dust. I work for a small business. What do you think I will do if my boss goes out of business? Nothing. I will be jacked, becuase there will be nothing here for me. I will have to go overseas for work (as I told two other people). So I will go overseas and stay there for as long as necessary, and if I can't get work back in the US then I'm also not going to retire to the US, which means the US government will get no tax revenue from me. It also means that they will get no tax revenue from my boss, or his business. So that's less revenue for them, and that's just one example. Of course, if they put us out of business then the fact that they will lose revenue across the board and eventually collapse will cause me to shed about as many tears as Chuck Norris.
So what I'm saying is, under Romney the tax cuts will pay for themselves, because more people will be entering the work force. Under Obama, there will be tax hikes AND increased spending. This man is a mad spender, and so is his party, and most of the stuff they spend money on is either detrimental or useless.
I don't understand how anyone who has a non-government sector job could want Barack Osama to win. One way it's about ideology, because I despise Islam, homosexuality, the UN/world government, anti-semitism, and entitlement/dependence minded people. On the other hand it's about survival, because I don't want to lose my job. I had some job offers for work overseas but passed them up because my family is all here, and I want to settle down and have kids in a good strong family setting. But if Obama wins, then maybe my boss will go out of business, which means I'm out of a job. If I'm out of a job then I will blame Obama and his zombie like supporters, and my anger towards them will be great. If that happens, I'm overseas, and I'll make 100% the government doesn't get a single cent of my money because I got driven out of my own country by them.
As for my contempt for welfare, I think I outlined my reasons pretty well. I don't like being held back by lazy people, and I can't feel sorry for them as long as they are wilfully being parasites on hard working people. It's one thing to ask for help from family, friends, charitees, and churches, or to humbly accept help from voluntary givers. It's entirely another thing to demand it from government, and in the meantime be a parasitic burden on society. Those people I cannot stand, and the fact that the Democrats want to raise taxes on my employer (and others) so that they can increase the amount of people on welfare in order to buy votes just makes me despise them as well. I also consider the Democrats to be parasites, and to me they are about as good and useful for society as bot flies.
@cmdr_keen - wow, compelling arguments. Thank you for your strong defense of our president.
Preach it! :)
@cmdr_keen - Sorry, I forgot to mention corporate welfare. I am 100% against Federal bailouts, moreso than Obama, who bailed out GM. Now if you're talking about tax cuts, then that's not really welfare. So let me be clear, I'm against the government giving anyone money in exchange for nothing/handouts. There are really only 3 things that I want government to do:
1) Military
2) Interstate highways
3) Space exploration and colonization
I definitely want the government out of education, 100%.
@CuddlyKat - Thanks, I will!
@New1E13_15 - Thanks, yes the focus of this entry was fairly limited. Of course there are other factors as well. You know, what I heard is that 30 million Christians stayed home during the last election, and Obama won by 10 million votes. Even though Romney is not perfect I definitely believe that we need to get out and vote for him. Neither candidate shares our religious beliefs but 1) Romney is much closer and 2) he is at least a pragmatist, while Obama is a globalist-socialist whose loyalties are elsewhere.
@mtngirlsouth - Well what's your plan then? I'm open to suggestions and ideas. Also I have no problem with the idea of secession.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - My plan is to hunker down and get ready. My plan is for my family and I to survive with as little pain as possible. There are too many stupid people for any real change to happen until they are half starved from their stupidity. Maybe at that point there will be enough people ready to take the stand needed to make any real change. It just won't happen now. Too many people who are too lazy, too stupid, too much normalcy bias so they cannot comprehend how dire their situation actually is. They won't be ready to do anything about it until they feel it. And by then it may very well be too late. This thing may not be fixed for generations.
@VampireOfSeduction - Well one thing is that the culture has undergone some drastic changes over the course of US history, and has gotten away from the traditional values which made us strong and stable in the past. Values and beliefs have a lot to do with how people act, without good values in place you just have bare human nature, which is intrinsically selfish even to the detriment of others.
I seriously hope Obama does not win, and I'm praying that he doesn't, but I definitely believe his changes of winning are good for the reasons you have given, and for the reasons I have given in this entry.
I think that FDR and LBJ did a lot to steer the Democrats toward socialism, but the hardcore ideological gap which we have today is relatively recent. Most of that garbage happened in my lifetime. Compare Clinton to Obama. Clinton wasn't good, but the difference between him and Bush was not so vast and gaping as what we have now.
I may be somewhat paranoid, although definitely not Alex Jones level paranoid, but if I have any paranoia it is strictly on a personal level, out of legitimate concern that my employer might go under. We already lost a lot of business because of policies put in place by the Obungle administration. Since I'm going to be getting married soon I want to make sure my job survives, and that I don't have to be in the place where I'm unemployed and looking for work again. But I think when it comes to issues that are bigger than me I prefer to identify as a cynic rather than paranoid, or as a realist. I don't believe that people have a natural tendency to "do the right thing" or a natural tendency toward altruism.
I have to say, for someone so young you have a lot of sense and maturity. If you hadn't said you were born in 1990 I never would have guessed you were so much younger than me. You seem to have a really firm grasp on the issues.